Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Normal type of Response or The Divine Interpretation?

If the Holy Spirit is NOT the one doing the teaching TRULY what has any "Believer" In Christ clearly understood over the "Course" of time in terms of becoming One with Christ? sw


Is a personage ONLY considered to be a teacher because of their title or because of the one whose given them their title. sw

Is it possible a good teacher can simultaneously be esteemed as your enemy. sw

Within the scope of the term 'Taste", how many different flavors does Truth come in. sw

Even the ungodly understand there's clearly differences when attempting to resolve matters of The church. Matters that are tasked with trying to accommodate the blended perspective and judgement of unbelievers (Ungodly)?

And to who do the Shepherds answer to? 

To then try to spiritually discern to whom the church has truthfully yoked itself to? And as such while in the midst of spiritual challenges only Believers In Christ can "Hopefully" See for all that those things "Truly Are"?

Eph 6:12-13
For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms

NIV

When and if it is NOT understood how far the boundaries of heaven do reach or to whom the property of heaven truly belongs to, who then is able to comprehend not only what any battle is about but also the type of weaponry required in order to somehow resist an otherwise invisible enemy?

Is it any wonder why Christianity is conceptualized a close relative of some form of Voo-Doo? A type that's based primarily upon what some only suggest they've "Believed" to be True?

And what are empty words when truthfully considering those things ONLY The One True God can bring to pass as if an extension of His Throne and Majesty?

Job 6:30

Is there iniquity in my tongue? Cannot my taste discern perverse things? KJV

1 Cor 6:1-6
If any of you has a dispute with another, dare he take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the saints?

Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life

Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, appoint as judges even men of little account in the church! I say this to shame you


Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers


But instead, one brother goes to law against another — and this in front of unbelievers
NIV

In the ears of the hearer, who's who within any prophecy? To then try and task the same question when it's not clear when, where or why the voice of a prophet has since become unfamiliar. sw


And who IS the TRUE author of the Psalms if NOT also a Prophet of God? The same type who speaks on behalf of the Good Grace of God?

Ps 34:8-10
Taste and see that the LORD is good;
blessed is the man who takes refuge in him. 

Fear the LORD, you his saints, for those who fear him lack nothing. 

The lions may grow weak and hungrybut those who seek the LORD lack no good thing. 
NIV

2 Tim 4:3-5
For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. 



They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths

NIV


How many can honestly acknowledge they've clearly understood the definition of a "Myth" yet they've believed a Lie at the next turn. sw

Truly what is anything that stands out hoping to be recognized as quality if its equal is not something seen In Christ. sw

In terms of divine perspective, who was 'Adam"?

Believe it or not there is enough "Potential" within that one small question that could ultimately divide ANY group of people who claim they are followers of Christ!

What many seem to be MORE than willing to over look is what it is about Adam Or Christ Jesus that qualifies either as a son of God?

Is their entitlement as "Son" only a matter of what either did while here, or because of what God 'Said" about each of them before they arrived on scene?

Have you ever sat and eternally considered what "free will" in turn makes 'Affordable"?

To then consider what most in turn do with that same free will in their physically life sized decisions made?

Is there such a thing as a timeline in the mind of God? 

And if the response of a child of God is always "Yes" what then does the worded response "No" ever have a truthful chance of revealing?

If something or someone has NEVER been seen before, who then can not only measure but explain same for all that it was intended without God providing the interpretation?

Can the same question be ask of the purpose God intended mankind to serve?

To then find self retracing those same steps while trying to Reconsider Gods intention for the "Ekklisia" (Church)

To then reduce that consideration to a smaller scale, what purpose did God intend YOU to serve?

How many who believe in Christ also believe that wherever it is that anyone ultimately ends up has everything to do with where each 'Began"?

How does anyone get back on course if they were never On Course to begin with?

And what is a 'Collision Course"?

If a man never gets off course what then will he suffer from if suffering were intended of God to somehow participate in teaching what God desires to be made known beyond 'Doubt"?

And what does the history of a known liar continue in order to try and prove or disprove? 

What many are failing to "Truthfully" examine is the 'Why' anyone would choose to speak against what another has said?

My "Personal" suggestion would be to first establish "Why"?

Have you ever sat and reasoned out who the real players are within any type of "Interpretation" process?

Example, what value can be found in ANYTHING anyone has said until it's been established beyond doubt who it was that provided what has been spoken?

A more finite example might prove to be, "Where did Paul truly receive the full value of his "Great Revelation"?

Was it on the road to Damascus? While lying in a bed unable to see with his natural eyes? 

Was it while on the back side of the desert? While in the Holy Temple of God? 

Was it in the presence of his historical teacher Gamaliel? Was it in the midst of his heart, mind and soul? 

Was it when he witnessed his person somehow participating in his first, second or third miraculous healing? While in His mothers 'Womb"?

And who are those who look for a type of physical evidence in order to somehow prove "Their" perspective?


Ps 143:10

Teach me to do your will, 
for you are my God;

may your good Spirit 
lead me on level ground

NIV


The same type of evidence it more than likely took to prove same to their own souls?

The economics of Value will always boil down to what is true and who has been deceived. And when both of those have served their righteous purpose they will eventually prove the reason 'Why"?

 I used to wonder why some who claim to be believers In Christ who claim to have tasted of the goodness of God try to resist the growth process among other believers.

The reality I've since chosen to see within those type of venues are the type of thoughts that are willing to align themselves with 'Teaching" a man!

The type which suggest teaching him how to fish verses simply "Feeding" him day after day so that he will never go hungry?

How many today have received THE revelation of Christ? 

The revelation of Christ that does not require any other formal introduction and that because Christ is NOT divided?

Some might say "I get it", yet how many can hear the voice of TRUE authority speaking where No man would then be quartered, drawn and hanged because of having said the wrong thing?

That said, "Resisting the Holy Spirit should equate to what within ANY scenario"?

Yet whose to say when the Holy Spirit is speaking today or Not? And as such as if ONLY something to be discerned within the BODY of Christ in the earth today?

Discerned? Most definitely, yet by "Whom""

Even further, who is it that's making the determination that has all to do with not only the displeasure of God, but also what the Entire Body must suffer through as if the Whole?

Not only in terms of being made "One" but also suffering as if "One'?


Heb 5:7-10

Although he was a son, he learned obedience from what he suffered and, once made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him and was designated by God to be high priest in the order of Melchizedek. 
NIV







1 Cor 12:26
If one part suffers , every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it. 
NIV

Is there Truly a difference when someone prays differently for someone other than themselves?

Personally, I believe the ONLY one who can answer that is God who is also ONE with Christ!

Does the body of Christ in the earth not suffer from the things it's failed to TRUTHFULLY recognize? 

Otherwise, at what point can the Joy of the Lord speak not only out in the open but just as important......"Honestly"?




Tuesday, May 30, 2017

What has truly been 'Realized"?



In terms of the proverbial picture that's worth a thousand words, what do you see as if the essence of this video"? Just try watching it without reading the words below this line.            ______________________________________________

Now apply the narrative I've supplied and ask yourself if you agree with what you assume I'm suggesting by way of that "Same" narrative?

Based on the widely accepted definition below is there a type of "Intuitive" application that can not only be observed but also accurately "Applied"? As such that's been based only upon what can be "Seen" within the fashioned video above?

Please take note there are no "Obvious" street markings or red lights that can be seen, yet is that alone enough information to interpret what you do think you see? Also take note of the otherwise tiny dots that are pedestrians who are also crossing the intersection in different picture frames?

Now ask yourself, what is about this video you would personally NEED to see differently in order to accurately assess what you think you DO see in motion?

Enough that is to where this supplied imagery could find its legitimacy if it were tasked with "Proving" a specific point?

A Proven point "Made" as though something more than an "opinion" COULD be offered?

The type of opinion that's based NOT only on what CAN BE SEEN but also by way of what may NOT be seen at the speed in which it's being presented?

How different are our lives? Are they only individual images seen or are the lives we live out a series of pictures set in motion?

And that without the ability to play what has been seemingly captured at ANY chosen speed, namely "Fast Forwarded"? And much less being seen for what it is when played in "Reverse"?

The totality of life is often referred to as the "Bigger Picture" when trying to prove a more finite point, yet what is more often heard when a particular picture frame has seemingly been dissected from a bigger picture that's also otherwise constantly in Motion?

How many individual images have need of being "Seen" before the one observing those same images begins to grasp the commonality that can also be observed once those many individual images have been set in motion?

Why the more recent hype and/or focus upon 'Selfies"? Why the historical focus placed upon seeing self within a group picture taken of "Many"?

In term of timing and the divine order of ALL things that also apply to ALL mankind, "Why" is it the narrative (biography) of some of the most important people in history do NOT also have a personal picture that can also be associated?

Truly what has the "Imag-ination of mere men been formed from?

How powerful has the image become in light of a seemingly slow fade away from the need for the Truthful narrative?

In terms of a perceived Intuition" do pictures speak a thousand words? To then place the double burden on that response with, "Do pictures also speak a thousand "Truthful" words when taking the supplied narrative into 'Account"?

And exactly why do men suggest their own eyes can play tricks on them?

Eyes that can play tricks while in possession of ears that can and do taste words?

Job 12:11
Does not the ear test words as the tongue tastes food?
NIV

What part of a man also processes all of his said "Intel"? The same type of "Intel" he's historically relied upon having come by way of his natural 5 senses which then further promotes the same type of "Intelligence" many refer to as 'Wisdom"?

Wisdom from where though, 'Above or below"?

Rom 8:16-17
The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God's children. Now if we are children, then we are heirs — heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory.
NIV

All the above having experienced the similar suggestion where a passing scent is capable of interfering with the sense of ones taste or making them momentarily nauseous or ill minded should that same scent finds itself serving at the whim of a simultaneously conjured "Bad Memory"?

Are the 5 senses of the body also a part of the same body the Apostle Paul suggest he had to metaphorically beat into submission? Or did Paul have to retrain his mindset so that those same God given senses could then be found serving the spirit of The Lord?

And what does the divine renewal of the mind "Entail"?

All the above said, How does a man find himself "Believing" what has only been spoken of" by an otherwise invisible presence? To then try and truthfully make sense of a God that says of His person that He IS SPIRIT?

The same type of spirit the flesh in and of itself is NOT capable of Inheriting? And if NOT the flesh what part of a man is left to inherit ANYTHING God who is spirit has also supplied?

And that while considering the "Power" of any mans testimony that has ONLY to do with ALL that is True?

Does a picture alone also provide sufficient context in order to explain why only certain things may or may NOT be seen for all that they ARE in the sight of God?

3 John 8
We ought therefore to show hospitality to such men so that we may work together for the truth .
NIV

2 Cor 13:7-9
7 Now we pray to God that you will not do anything wrong. Not that people will see that we have stood the test but that you will do what is right even though we may seem to have failed. For we cannot do anything against the truth, but only for the truth .

We are glad whenever we are weak but you are strong; and our prayer is for your perfection.

NIV


How many have heard of and seen the Kingdom of God, yet only as though from afar? And how many have been allowed to enter that kingdom based on all they've chosen to believe to BE TRUE about that same kingdom?

What type of man is it who can claim to know more about the Kingdom that is ONLY in heaven who seems to know even less about the territory and rightful property here on earth that also belongs to that same kingdom in heaven?

The same kingdom Christ has made known that is within those who HAVE believed?

And what does being away from the Lord in BODY suggest? On vacation? Away on "Sabbatical"?

And what is it about this world that could somehow spiritually chain his soul to the likeliness of the images that belong to this World?

Those same images THIS world has provided? The narratives about those same images that have been "Re-worded" and then "Altered"?


in·tu·i·tion
ˌint(y)o͞oˈiSH(ə)n/
noun
  1. the ability to understand something immediately, without the need for conscious reasoning.

    "we shall allow our intuition to guide us"
    • a thing that one knows or considers likely from instinctive feeling rather than conscious reasoning.
      plural noun: intuitions

      "your insights and intuitions as a native speaker are positively sought"
      synonyms:hunch, feeling (in one's bones), inkling, (sneaking) suspicion, ideasensenotion










Thursday, May 25, 2017

A reliable source of Information, is it TRULY a gift from God many are willing to LOOK into?

In terms of some who have to rely upon the certainties that seem to revolve around the "Unknowns" in this world , how many find this realm to be a safe place in which they can try and hide. sw

Is there a true reason why the "Bigger Picture" always proves to be more than mans physical eyes are able to see. sw

What type of scenario proves true when a mans physical eyes grow weak his spiritual ears in turn grow strong in order so that his spiritual eyes can see more? sw

To which natural sense does any physical distraction present its appeal in terms of proving spiritual intuition to be inadequate? sw

If a man were to accept and in turn "Know" that all of his complexities reside in his soul, where would he then turn for counsel for his own soul. sw

Truly what is "Oversight" without the type of perspective that can see further then the eyes can. sw

I wanted to touch on a few things that have and still are proving to be of great importance.

Of great importance to interpret not only "Where the thoughts of my heart and mind seem to lead me in any given day" but also "Why" they can and do remain sufficient enough to lead me ANYWHERE as if their mutual assessment(s) being offered have matured enough to be trustworthy?

In terms of there truly being difference between worldly oriented 'Logic" and spiritual (discernment) how is it possible to seemingly draw a line between the two in terms of drawing a comparison?

That is to suggest at which end of ones state of awareness does the "Renewal of the Mind" begin much less 'End" in terms of "Fruition"?

Anywhere to more than suggest "Somewhere" I also Truly "Want" to Go?

What is it about the type of results whenever you do find yourself somewhere you don't wish to be?

I personally consider it worthy of asking "Is there such a thing as God preparing "You"? If yes, preparing you or I for what?

And when I suggest God having prepared "You, that should also agree with something done in "Advance"?

How many have heard at some moment in time their inner voice suggest, "I didn't SEE this one coming"? I'm of the opinion that if you haven't to date, "You Will"! Otherwise You KNOW all things too well!

And what is "Imperfection" if NOT the very thing that requires being accurately "Defined"? Defined maybe, yet defined by "Whom" and how "Precise"?

Now if you can allow it, "Does God require anything being accomplished on this side of eternity?
If you answered "Yes" "What" does God require?

And if you answered Yes and do NOT know what God does require, why should you then assume you have any real "Clue" you will ever Truly discover "WHY" you are wherever it is you then "Find yourself within a "Particular" set of circumstances?

Some might even suggest a certain type of 'Scenario"....

Ever truly looked into the word Deja vu?

Please keep in mind I have no clue who wrote these words below in terms of their origin NOR did I draft these words below on my own, I've simply borrowed from what they are attempting to "Convey".

"Déjà Vu" is a common intuitive experience that has happened to many of us. The expression is derived from the French, meaning "already seen." When it occurs, it seems to spark our memory of a place we have already been, a person we have already seen, or an act we have already done. It is a signal to pay special attention to what is taking place, perhaps to receive a specific lesson in a certain area or complete what is not yet finished.

Having read the above what if a person WERE to truly and deeply consider the SOURCE from which they WERE derived (origins)? And as such even if ONLY in part?

Think about it having been given enough TIME, does't each part of all that a man is also have a history? Meaning his (mans) 3 part being (spirit, body & soul)?

And if each part does have a history, exactly how far back or "Forward" does any of those three parts also have access to NOT only in terms of remembrance but the remembrance of what?

Where were you before you found yourself here and where is it you CLAIM to be returning to? As if where you were BEFORE you were here? Are you only being asked about the whereabouts of your body in any given moment in time?

John 14:25-27
"All this I have spoken while still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you

Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid. 

NIV

Not only why, but how could it be suggested 'Wake Up oh sleeper so that Christ Can shine upon you"?

And where was the spirit of God before having been "Placed In You or I"? Was that spirit a part of who God is before creation? Was that same spirit kept in darkness while also being a part of God before being 'Dispensed"?

To then TRULY consider (Having Believed) that it is the Spirit of God within that testifies WITH our spirit? As if Two who 'Agree"?

The same spirit many claim to have received upon "Regeneration" (Having been Born again and as such OF GOD)? 

Should God have need of Communicating with those whom ARE His OWN, how would He (god) convey and with clarity whatever it is He also has to say?

Some might suggest "Through" the bible (Holy Words), yet how has that also historically played out in terms of how many and how much ANY man, women or child has also deeply "Investigated" those same words as though "God were Speaking directly to their person"?

And those same words as compared to "WHAT"? Not only  in terms of their TRUE "Potential", but their TRUE potential for what 'REASON"?

Now try and truthfully revisit the why anyone seemingly loves to BOLDY----> PRO-claim not only their own imperfection as if an excuse for all they've done while here on earth?

Did Jesus only preach "Christ" crucified and resurrected or was this event intended to "Reintroduce" the Kingdom Of God to those who've been blinded in their 'Soul" concerning what is TRUE beyond ones present 'Sight"?


Having clearly stated what HAS BEEN, why then should any man show any REAL concern for ALL that has been done while in his mortal body?pro

Is there a reason why whenever God does speak of  more certain things that do revolve around 'Whatever you've set your heart to do" he also further comments about same as "Having been done been Done through His person, namely the "Christ"?

What is the type of pursuit that includes having to revisit much of the information that may have only been spoken, heard and/or read "Once" and in a particular "Way"? The same type that needs zero improvement in its complete interpretation?

Does divine interpretation only mean, Once upon a time? Once upon a Place? Once beyond the place of True "Reason"? And what does the testing of ones Faith in the ONE true God then appear as if "Once upon a time" when you THOUGHT you heard the voice of His spirit speak is THAT PLACE?

I personally had to find myself willing to accept and face having found myself in a position of being questioned with things such as"Who told you what you think you Know to be true"? There nearly always seems to be at least one in every crowd.

How do you within your heart consider the type of  person who announces in advance what they're about to say, 'Let me be the devils advocate in this instance"?

I personally do NOT think that in this world the devil needs a recruiter! Why? Because he already has more than enough "Volunteers"!

Often times the above type of questions followed up with question that might sound like, "And where are Those who told you NOW? Were those who informed "You" also righteous men and woman of God?

Is there a difference between the two? If "Yes", what is the difference and how did you discern in those moments?

As if to suggest, "Who" was it that provided the seed I assumed had been planted within me and when was I to expect to see the "Fruit" of all that I have believed to be True that has been planted?

It was as if being lead to the "Ultimate Question...."When will the harvest be"?

And if I've NOT seen any fruit to date, what should I then assume is also True that I've merely been told?

I've said all this to hopefully convey a type of encouragement. The type of encouragement that can ONLY be seen as encouragement once it's been accepted there is such a thing as "Spiritual Challenge(s)" for those who are "In Christ"!

And what is ANY challenge without also truthfully having recognized the entanglement of 'Obligation"?

Rom 4:4-6
Now when a man works, his wages are not credited to him as a gift, but as an obligation . However, to the man who does not work but trusts God who justifies the wicked, his faith is credited as righteousness. David says the same thing when he speaks of the blessedness of the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works:
NIV

If David was found to be worthy in his wisdom above having been quoted from the book of Psalms, then why would he also NOT be found to be wise in having spoken the following in another place?

Ps 1:2-3
But his delight is in the law of the LORD, and on his law he meditates day and night. 
He is like a tree planted by streams of water, which yields its fruit in season 
and whose leaf does not wither.Whatever he does prospers. NIV

Will the greatest of those obligation prove to be the full investment of "ALL of ones heart, mind, soul and strength" yet in what direction? And as such to then be considered having been "Filled" by the Holy Spirit enough to also prove who is speaking in ANY God Given Moment?

It's one thing to suggest having employed someone else to do a job who will also prove to have been fully invested, yet how much of this same type of investment also gets "Internalized" without self somehow getting directly "Involved" and more than probable "In the Way"?

As if to suggest it an obligation or place of expectancy where one's doings looks like one who's "Doing ALL things as if unto the Lord"?

It's one thing to fall short of the glory of God because of what is "Impossible", yet how short does anyone also "Fall short" having declared they'vs claimed their right to one and the same inheritance?

God says what Counts is a NEW CREATION, yet what if New involved the continued retelling of what this newness also would appear as? And what is a prophecy that does NOT manifest as God says it would?

To then truthfully consider the need of the Holy Spirit, and as such without also being "filled" with the Holy Spirit? In terms of Two becoming One, at what point do the words of God also agree with His spirit? As if One also within a chosen vessel?

And as such in what form that does NOT also dwell among mere men as if fulfilling of a continued purpose?

And what does any man deem as the impossible without also FIRST being shown that "Anything is possible If God is also for it?

And what has been inherited from God if Not EVERY WORD that has come from His mouth? And as such "untainted"?

Is there a TRUE reason why a spiritual endowment does NOT have anything to do with our physical prowess? The type of prowess whose exchange rate more often proves to have little to zero dollar value within the divine economy?

Don't ask me How I know" yet somehow I do know deep within "I'm NOT alone in this assessment"?

As simply a side note, I'll attempt to introduce a thought pattern here in the form of a question, Is there a difference between a "Judgement" that's being 'Passed" and an "Assessment" that's been "Made"?

Without the way being made clear to the Throne room of Grace where Grace has been provided access to, who then has ANY ..True Hope?

Whereas IF the way to the throne room of grace has been made clear, who then is found unworthy if ONLY the sinner is prohibited from entering into that throne room in order to FIND the Grace Needed in order to somehow accomplish what God has set before all men to somehow do?

And what if the ONLY type of doing God desires is to "Believe" in the One He has sent in order to justify those who are otherwise considered to be 'Wicked"?

And how many have truly asked what Did Christ accomplish if NOT as an example to be followed? Yet who gets to determine when the ORIGINAL pattern gets deviated?

The image here might be where some "Criminal" had just been made by the "Cops" having observed this person mingling in a crowded environment.

Years ago I finally grew tired "Enough" of arguing at nearly every turn with "Self" as well remaining frustrated about "Uncertain things" in this world, especially while trying to seek out those who might or should know better about the things of God than I do.

Especially when being Honest with self in terms of a pursuit that at best was producing "Vague' results!

As with anything I think a person needs to know what the qualifications are that also define just about everything a man is curious about. Some might even consider what I'm suggesting in a different 'Way" to be the finding of 'Facts'?

As this inquiry began to unfold I had to finally reach a frame of mind where I could truly assess what I assumed I DID know to be true about the Lord and just as important the things I was NOT thoroughly convinced about His person.

One of the "First" things I discovered as if part of this "Framework" that had no clear "Image" within it that also vexed my soul was the consideration as to 'Where" I should "Look for God"?

Common sense being everything that it's NOT at times, it struck me like a lightning bolt!

It hit me in the form of a question that suggested, "How was I ever to know beyond doubt that I was at least on the "Right" set of tracks while looking for something or someone if I had no clue what same also 'Looked Like"?

Sometime later I found myself watching an old movie about 'Sherlock Holmes". In this movie his side kick Dr Watson had just been addressed as 'Brilliant" having stated the supposedly "Obvious" after having so profoundly stated "That was a girl"!

To then hear Sherlock respond with "Brilliant Deduction"!

Don't ask why, but I've since taken hold of those two words and vowed their substantive nature to be something I could build upon!

So, here I am many years later as I find myself still seeking the Lord at nearly every turn of nearly every day.....

Below are a few of the things I have discovered in my pursuit to date which depict the TYPE of personage I NEED to find as well a few consideration that allow me in a given moment to KNOW what I do find is NOT always what is True......and how much of "That" because only God can truly define ALL that Love is?

And what is the Grace that is of God and who can find? And as such without Knowing who love is or what it is any man has need of 'Doing" in order to find "Same" in his life time!

And what are YOU looking for while TRUTHFULLY assessing same at every turn?

Your type of God or "Whomever" it is you want to believe?

What is any man or woman unless Christ has not only been conceived, but even greater completely formed within the bowels of all that God considers "Spiritual'?

Spoken like a true Father or one that is also One with the Father and in turn one seen as a prophet of that same 'God and Father"?

And what does a prophet that is Of God admit to, confess and acknowledge as such that God has NOT said? And who is it that has also "Inspired" what has been 'Said" in this 'World'?

Gal 4:19-20
My dear children, for whom I am again in the pains of childbirth until Christ is formed in you , 20 how I wish I could be with you now and change my tone, because I am perplexed about you!
NIV







Luke 16:14-15
The Pharisees, who loved money, heard all this and were sneering at Jesus. He said to them, "You are the ones who justify yourselves in the eyes of men, but God knows your hearts. What is highly valued among men is detestable in God's sight. NIV


John 14:6-7
Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

If you really knew me, you would know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him."  
NIV


1 John 4:7-12
Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God.

Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love . This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. 10

This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins.

Dear friends, since God so loved us, we also ought to love one another. No one has ever seen God; but if we love one another, God lives in us and his love is made complete in us.
NIV

If there were NO NEED to judge no other much less yourself, what ground could this mindset stand on in suggesting such a thing? Especially while honestly suggesting to 'Self' the verdict of Gods judgement has ALREADY been handed 'Down" to all mankind.


And that verdict in advance of what some are presently refusing to truthfully judge as if for Themselves?

John 3:19-21
9 This is the verdict : Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil.

Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.

But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God."  
NIV