Search This Blog

Wednesday, May 25, 2016

For we cannot do anything against the truth , but only for the truth.

Exactly what would a distorted Image of God look like in this world? Exactly what would motivate however many to try and distort the Image of God in the earth?

If it were thought to be  a crime, how many would continue? How is it possible to distort something that is not tangible that can be seen with natural eyes or be physically touched or handled on demand?

Why is it so easily assessed as cheap entertainment at times when a small child is given a set of crayons or painting instruments and a blank sheet of paper where they're then instructed to illustrate "God" to their best ability?

In terms of distorting the image of God have you ever tried to explain exactly who it is that's guilty of such a crime in a room full of people and that without pointing a finger?

What I mean is simply laying out the charge while trying to "Clearly" articulate exactly why a certain "Few" would choose to continue to distort what is otherwise True in the sight of God? Is it even possible while knowing what God has to say?

The pointing out of certain things that were by design and ave been tasked with aligning themselves with the purposes in having also been created of One and the same Creator?

At what point can situational ethics present the type of venue where another "player" steps in and robs a created being of such glory? A type of glorious day where not only some aspect of God has been accurately revealed, but also one where that revealing gets to be mutually "Enjoyed"?

Gen 1:26
Then God said, "Let us make man in our image , in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."  NIV

In terms of dominion, there being an unseen war and a final outcome (whether totally understood or not) why is it essential to recognize not only a God as the Champion of those processes, but even further Jesus as the "Christ" who sustains this often times and otherwise invisible "Hope" ?

Such a "Hope" that also reveals and agree's with the declaration which states, "Christ In You"?

The bulk of mankind is slowly arriving or being turned to such a place where its being ever so slowly understood, that what some can or can NOT see that does pertain to the Truth about God actually does have everything to do with what an individual chooses to believe to be "True" or "Not"?

And as the result a war that is since still being fought that began and continues to be waged through the mere expressions of "Words"?

I used to (skim) read over certain things found in the bible as if insignificant or none applicable. Insignificant to not only interpret as such that has since proven to have everything to do with my personal inability and reason for my own forgetfulness that would otherwise lead me to strain in order to somehow see things take up their rightful place in the sight of God.

A type of forgetfulness that looks much like a person who studies their own reflection in a mirror in the morning and in the evening questions who they then see on the other side of the events of each day and the long term affects of same? How does a man then plead anything that also truthful without the Hope of Christ In them?

Certain things that go on to prove and require more and more as to "Why" they may or may NOT see things in the fashion they do?

The context of the passage below places the author in the throws of trying not only to explain but also to get as many as were "Willing" to "See" why some were failing to recognize the interaction of God among them. That is also to suggest in the fashion He does reveal himself and the reason they did or did NOT see those same things

In no way misunderstand me in that Paul (author) was in NO WAY trying to justify God or what God was doing in their sight, yet how do we know this?

I personally see this passage as Paul's most accurate attempt at expressing the otherwise elusive meaning of the word "Weakness" in Gods sight. Exactly what was at the heart of Paul's weakness, "His inability to "See" God for who He is? And that in order that He might somehow begin to understand God and why He (God) does things the "Way" He does?

Something he (Paul) not only understood on a much deeper level than most but more importantly the why He eventfully does come to a place to where he can see God (Holy Spirit) in motion and that for who He (God) is and understands Him (God) to be?

And all the above being applied and for "Whose" ultimate benefit?

Much like a father, what Paul was trying to teach on was the same thing He also had to go through before God could teach him how to grasp (take hold of) of a more complete scenery of Gods interaction.

A Most certain revealing where he (Paul) knew that God planned to do through not only his personage on earth but also whosoever will pursue those same things in the fashion he (Paul) did and as such that would hopefully become the same "Type" of passion that comes to life within those who have believed?

One more thought before you read what Paul places before those who consider themselves converted as those who also suggest they've believed, "How can or is it even possible for someone who's deceived to then truthfully examine themselves?

2 Cor 13:5-10
Examine yourselves to see whether you are in the faith; test yourselves. Do you not realize that Christ Jesus is in you unless, of course, you fail the test?

(How is Paul so sure they will find that he and others had not "Failed" the testing of their Faith?) 

And I trust that you will discover that we have not failed the test. Now we pray to God that you will not do anything wrong. Not that people will see that we have stood the test but that you will do what is right even though we may seem to have failed.

For we cannot do anything against the truth , but only for the truth.

(In a very nice manner Paul is trying to explain his own likeness unto The Father "God" which came to him by way of his "Great Revelation" that actually does reveal "Christ Within". As if to suggest what you see of Him (Christ) in terms of His behavior towards those HE has been sent and compelled to teach? 

A specific type of spiritual and behavioral change in mindset that will cause the origin of mans overall weakness before "God" to grow pale in comparison to Christ In You! The type of power that ONLY a True King can have and exert over His subjects...

Much like Christ exhibited of Himself in order to reveal his otherwise worldly assumed weakness (Love) so that men would "HOPEFULLY"  receive his likeness unto the Heavenly (Divine) Father). In terms of being absent, we must also remember Christ in his saying "It is better that I should depart so that another should come".

In terms of equality in Gods sight, how is it that Paul or anyone can speak with true "Authority" without it also being Christ who's speaking through a personage?)

We are glad whenever we are weak but you are strong; and our prayer is for your perfection. This is why I write these things when I am absent, that when I come I may not have to be harsh in my use of authority — the authority the Lord gave me for building you up, not for tearing you down.
NIV

In a nutshell, one still has to find Paul or anyone else "Believable" in their own accounting of the "Christ".

 Such a man who gave of the life he (Paul) was also given in order to go on to tell of another man namely Jesus the Christ whom also sacrificed in order that some might come to know their corporate "Father" and creator....all of which helps explain "Why" you were put here in the beginning!

In terms of mankind, a man named Paul or Saul surely some of every generation could try and justify themselves as compared, ye what of the man in whom No sin was found and it was impossible for him to Lie and that in the sight of God?

Is your hope based on the lie God can NOT see or has no ears that always hear? Is your hope based on NOT being found to be the worst of the worst among many who are in your opinion?

Now ask yourself as compared to whom?

To then try to name them and then find the one who will accept that list as if somehow they are less worthy of an accounting that is without they're eternal hope of Christ also being found to be in them on a most certain day soon to come?

Luke 23:34
Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do . And they parted his raiment, and cast lots. KJV

There is a time in the past of many when these words in red might be true, yet there is a time in everyone's future where it can not be True. A time found on the other side of the revelation of a man Named Jesus the Christ.

A time where all have been told yet only some would choose to believe what they've been told of His coming that should not come as a surprise or thief in the Night!

1 Thess 5:4-5
But you, brothers, are not in darkness so that this day should surprise you like a thief. You are all sons of the light and sons of the day.
NIV


A most certain time when every knee will be given to bow before Him that is due to His far exceeding Majesty and Glory. Amen, Lord come quickly!





Wednesday, May 18, 2016

Facing the facts does not mean abusing the "Right"

There's much that could be said about many things, yet choosing to speak only of meaningful things also suggest the redeemable value and profitability of time that's been given. sw

Why do certain things that are discovered in this world prove to be "Phenomenal"?

Wouldn't the depth of the word "Phenomenal" also need to be qualified by the depth of the observer?

Take for example the small child who for the first time finds an acorn on the forest floor?

It doesn't seem to be that big of a deal right? Especially when the child lifts their eyes and sees there are thousands more acorns just like the one in their hand lying every where!

But if you were to ask that child how many tree's they see in that same forest, what then becomes more obvious to someone else who's already "In the Know"?

Does their perspective allow for them to only take inventory of the tree's that are already vertical OR do they stop and consider the enormous potential that are already within the acorn in hand?

In terms of "Innocence" where does its crest meet with the realm of what anyone is assumed to know? When I ask this I'm suggesting looking into a realm of the "Unknown". A place that's been defended for so long in that there's no way possible for it ever to be discovered what others might be thinking at any given moment?

Is it possible to consider God in this same way? God as if also a realm where no man can ever have any hope that's also real of ever finding himself able to look into this said realm in order to simultaneously know what's in the heart of God at any given moment?

Why would a man ever contemplate looking into such a realm, I mean come on we're talking about God here, right?

The same God who also task everyone who suggest they believe in Him to also Be made "Like Him"? Am I still correct so far?

The same God who also said that in the beginning, He made "Man" (Adam) or "Mankind" in His own image?

The same God who tells this said "Mankind" to call no one on earth their "Father"? Is there any wisdom to be gleaned in such a suggestion?

Not if you don't "KNOW" what it is you're also looking for.....

Now if you can, allow yourself to be introduced to the concept of being in "Possession" of an "Identity"?

Is an "Identity" something to be "Possessed" or should it be thought of as such that somehow "Possesses" You?

In terms of one and the same end that's coming and there being only One creator of ALL, exactly how many True Identities can there Be in His eyes?

Are we only talking about "differences between a Pine, Oak and Fig tree? Or are we trying to narrow down individually exactly what it is that gives EACH of them "Life"?

This thing being called "Life" as we NOW know it that as such we've been trained to accept it to be? (Think back on the child in the forest with the single acorn in hand).

Just think how profound many have thought themselves to be and for how long as they go on to do nothing more than "Repeat" what some other fellow being has introduced them to?

How can there be speech that's also TRUE in terms of a "PERSONAL" relationship with One God? A specific type of "Speech" that will also withstand the numerous series of circumstances ONE and the same God also created and forewarns man about?

We can look at the words such as  "Converse" and suggest we understand its depth yet how easy do we forget the origins of such words?

Words LIKE "Convert, Conversion or Conversation" when we not only tell ourselves but try and convince ourselves and others around us that we have understood this medium (Realm) of "spoken words"?

A realm we've been using for how long, yet understand so "Little about? So Little of this potential, especially when we begin to think of a God whose likeness we've been made in as well told to aspire to be Like Him in as many ways as we find ourselves made able to?

And how can we find ourselves within ANYTHING assume to also "Possess" potential without the interaction and full process of the type of Faith God has been explaining and for how long and in how many ways?

How many TRUE models (representations) of Him (God) are there? And why the importance of there being ONLY One  "First borne" among those who "Will" themselves to follow Him?

 Is it still true today what God spoke to One man many many, many years ago?

Gen 4:6-7
Why is your face downcast? If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must master it ."
NIV

2 Cor 5:21-6:1
God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.
NIV

Rom 4:19-25
Without weakening in his faith, he faced the fact that his body was as good as dead — since he was about a hundred years old — and that Sarah's womb was also dead.

Yet he did not waver through unbelief regarding the promise of God, but was strengthened in his faith and gave glory to God, being fully persuaded that God had power to do what he had promised.

This is why "it was credited to him as righteousness."

The words "it was credited to him" were written not for him alone, but also for us, to whom God will credit righteousnessfor us who believe in him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead.

He was delivered over to death for our sins and was raised to life for our justification. 
NIV


Rev 11:15
The seventh angel sounded his trumpet, and there were loud voices in heaven, which said:

"The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ,
and he will reign for ever and ever."
NIV



Grace that is True Grace is the strength provided of God whereas His "Mercy" is the "Why" he gave such to as many who will only believe in Him. sw



Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Raising a "Disciple" or a "Believer"?

There are many powerful words yet few compare to the essence of that which trails behind the word "Because".sw

 In terms of the spoken word(s), picture the tongue as if a small bulldozer that paves (clears) the way for spiritual activity that does enter this world (realm)? Yet how much of what is said truly has to do with Who it was that said what has been "Said'?

Jesus said make straight (level) the path, yet how many have truthfully examined the condition of the trail they suggest they're blazing? And that same trail in the honest light as to how much of what any person says or does actually ends up supporting what is true verses "Suppressing" what is true nor leads others to Christ?

Why did the physical presence of Christ prove insufficient? That to mean that He remain here in physical form unto this day as the savior of of ALL humanity?

I'll answer that question in this way, why wouldn't it be safe to say, "We ALL know what the bible (Holy Writ of God) has to say about His (Jesus) physical presence leaving this world"?

Why did Christ also state it is better that He (in physical form) should go so that "Another" could come (The Holy Spirit)? One who would prove to be not only all sufficient but even more so that He could prove to be "WITH" all mankind if need be at ANY one given moment of time in His defining and our understanding of His "spiritual" Presence?

Yet in THIS day we're in ask any person who also suggest they are "Alive" what the "Spirited" version of God looks like and in what capacity does that same spirit manifest as if NOT as "Christ In You"?

To then go on and truly suggest you're comforted 24/7/365 in the thought of being "Full" of and/or have been "Filled" with that same "Holy Spirit"?

How is that some could even suggest in the sight of God there are some among us who are trying to "Be" "Too" spiritual? Is this true or simply an observation made that's being accompanied by a limited source of divine wisdom?

How many during the time of Christ physical appearance would have suggested the same about Paul, Timothy, Peter, Mary, Stephen James, John, Mathias or even Judas Iscariot? Namely who and what is it about any of them that would go on to prove their accuser(s) to be right or wrong?

While trying to realize the differences between any two people, one of which is either delighting in being carnally minded (spiritually immature) for their own sake and as if somehow opposed to others who truly are taking delight in their "Approach" to the thoughts of somehow "Being" continuously filled with the Holy Spirit?

Does this filling or indwelling happen all at once or does it's full effect(s) take place gradually over time? That to mean completely full to where nothing more can be added unto this person in question? In question "Maybe" but questioned by "Whom"?

How many today who also suggest the habitation (indwelling) of the Holy Spirit that is from Christ that is also alive and active 24/7/365? Exactly what does the Holy Spirit look and act like within a person during so called "Down" time?

Does this spirit ever sleep? Does it ever rest its mind? Does it always return comment when spoken to? Does it always have something to say? Is it always looking for something to do?

Examine closely every aspect of the divine moment captured in time Paul recorded here in terms of "In Spirit".

A specific type of discernment as if you can't leave out one single aspect of all that He goes on to say in order to define the right moment and under terms of the right thing to do in those type of moment(s). Keep in mind Paul had only heard about this man he'd already passed judgment on.

1 Cor 5:3-5
And I have already passed judgment on the one who did this, just as if I (justified) were present. When you are assembled in the name of our Lord Jesus and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present,
NIV

Holy spirit down time to further mean where and when that Holy Spirit is NOT Prophesying about the coming of Christ, parting seas, healing the sick or at least "Looking for" every God appointed opportunity to displace evil spirits?

To then ask the question that if you're NOT seeing the alive and active spirit of Christ every where you turn, whose spirit is being seen at work within any given being at any moment? And to think some suggest little to zero need for the Mind of Christ and at minimum Only on Sunday or their self appointed Holy day?

What did Christ mean when He said, "Today is the Day of the Lord"? Who is it that also decides when Today ends or begins?

Shouldn't it be, the one "Place" that any one who claims to be in Christ should want to be is together with Christ no matter where He "Christ" is? Yet where do those who suggest they believe every word Christ speaks, as if the place where He is also at any given moment?

Many want to be with Christ when He's on top of the mountain (Zion), yet somehow let Christ be found in prison, found face down in the street or on a cross and see how many also want to be there "With Him"? Christ also promises where two or more are gathered in His name He will be THERE "with" THEM, doesn't He?

He also promises that He will NEVER leave nor forsake those who are found to be in Him....

Does that also feed into when Christ sent some out in and for His names sake "Two by Two"? Why does it appear the Apostle Paul would send for someone whenever his former companion would for whatever reason abandon him (Paul) in a region?

It's one thing for a person to "Try" and frame what they're feeling (emotional state) AFTER the fact yet whose PREPARED themselves to receive the harsh reality that more often shows up during those times only God can define as righteous moments of weakness?

That same place where we find ourselves in agreement with Paul where He (God) goes into great detail in order for us to "Find"  (discover) our otherwise and often harsh reality in those moments of weakness for all they truly are in His eyes?

This world tries to condition Godlike beings to run from others who otherwise find themselves "In Trouble"...This world would have us who suggest we believe God to shun such beings because what they are experiencing might somehow prove to some to be contagious.

If God's "Will" and purpose(s) were being viewed as if those things which can ONLY be found (discovered) within the spiritual "Maturing Process" why do so many run from it? Why doesn't leaning on your own understanding also appear to us as leaning on what we've all chosen to be "True" or false?

Are we only talking about the after affects and net results of "How ever many" years have been spent on the outside of your mothers womb or instead are we TRUTHFULLY trying to discuss your God given (born again) spirit God has since assigned and the affect of having come from the spiritual womb of God (Christ)!

Does power make a difference?

If yes whose power are we truly discussing? Why is it that the sometimes subtle manifestation of Gods power doesn't also prove to be sufficient?

In terms of making do with what you do have and that without asking for more, why do some shy away from the question "Why Not" ask for more of who God is in your own process of being made like Him? Is it because more will be expected of our person were we to actually realize an increase of His likeness here on earth?

Is either one of the passage below any more true than the other? Or are both simply NOT being greeted with the "Yes" and "Amen"?

1 John 4:17-18
7 In this way, love is made complete among us so that we will have confidence on the day of judgment, because in this world we are like him . There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love.
NIV


1 John 3:2-3
But we know that when he appears, we shall be like him , for we shall see him as he is. Everyone who has this hope in him purifies himself, just as he is pure. NIV


If your NOT concerned or confident of who it is that speaking "Through" you at any given moment, truly who have you placed your confidence in?

Power is not always the impact of an immediate difference that's been realized. There are times when True power requires MORE than time to manifest.

Divine opportunity to truly speak or do at the precise moment requires being "Lead By the Spirit of God".

True confidence is when God validates and such even if it takes years for that validation to come. Praise God through His infinite wisdom He's exerted through Our Christ and Lord Jesus.

It is the power of His name being exalted the eternal enemies of God despise.

I'm confident in the assumption the coal miner whose found himself trapped in the collapsed mine where he's for years made his living to date doesn't question the motive or appearance of the lamp of one whose managed to find him where he is.

Isa 11:2-3
The Spirit of the LORD will rest on him — the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding,
the Spirit of counsel and of power, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD and he will delight in the fear of the LORD.
NIV

Prov 20:27
The lamp of the LORD searches the spirit of a man; it searches out his inmost being.
NIV


Judg 14:19
Then the Spirit of the LORD came upon him in power.
NIV

1 Sam 10:6
The Spirit of the LORD will come upon you in power, and you will prophesy with them; and you will be changed into a different person. NIV

Ps 106:32-33

By the waters of Meribah they angered the LORD ,and trouble came to Moses because of them; for they rebelled against the Spirit of God, and rash words came from Moses' lips.   
NIV

2 Sam 23:2
"The Spirit of the LORD spoke through me; his word was on my tongue. NIV

Rev 19:10
For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy." 
NIV








Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Pinnacle of what can't be seen

Stirring the heart should consist of more than revisiting thoughts which look only to keep you in the past. sw 

Is God only the God of what once was or is He also the God of eternity. sw

When it comes to discovering what is True, is there a real difference between an "Alliance" with God or the "Reliance" upon God. sw

Failing to understand servitude which leads to an alliance with the sinful nature has resulted in the imprisonment of many.

Claiming imperfection as the larger portion of your identity says what not only about being "found" righteous in the sight of God yet even more about your perspective of the One you're claiming has been made Lord over you?

It't one thing to assume you know all there is to know about God, yet do men forget the humility involved in knowing when God knows He has someone's undivided attention. sw

The one thing God did first for Paul was to make Him aware, hence the great "Revelation" Paul speaks of.

Yes, God made Paul aware, but aware of what in terms of what? Exactly how weak he (paul) was? At as such by the things he (Paul) suffered (endured) enroute?

How concise were the methods God used? That is to suggest the exact point and place where Paul knew beyond doubt he in and of himself could "Do" very little that was also meaningful to God and that "Without" God?

How could Paul convey to us today without mentioning the many who opposed Paul? How then could he gauge not only the door he discerned as being opened but also how "Effectual Work" he mentions?

1 Cor 16:8-9
8 But I will stay on at Ephesus until Pentecost, because a great door for effective work has opened to me, and there are many who oppose me. NIV

In terms of a must, it "Must" be decided whether or NOT Christ and His disciples were only addressing those back then within the context they describe OR as if they were alive today with us and vice versa.

It's one thing to suggest we're afraid of nothing due to our own ignorance/unbelief of all that is True, yet is it a different matter when we say we're not afraid of anything because we know beyond doubt God is with us?

In terms of Hope that is also real, how could some know to look for a King (Christ) that would eventually come? Did some undermine the receipt of their own fortune by reading "More" into the circumstances (context) under which that same King would eventfully appear?

And what about us today? And where today are those who suggest they also believe in Him who are also looking for Him (Christ) within specific circumstances (context) that are outside scope of what He promised?

Just because something new has been written does not do away with the origin of righteousness. A certain righteousness that upholds having also been recorded for our good?

When a larger fish swallows a smaller fish does the smaller fish simply cease to exist and/or somehow fail to participate in the growth of the consuming fish? Or is the smaller fish simply "Consumed" who then becomes part of all the larger fish goes on to do?

It's when we find ourselves as said "Believers" within a particular generation, who go on believing that which is NOT True that does concern the Christ that we then find ourselves faced with the opportunity to be lead astray.

The word "Aroused" is a peculiar word of choice, especially in the world in which we now live. A word specifically "Chosen" for a very specific reason in my opinion because of how well it has been clearly understood once a certain age/mindset has been reached.

The command "Taste not touch not" when under the influence of the wrong type of spiritual "Stewardship" (supervision) can and will "Arouse" certain desires according to the words of God.

To the spouse who loves their mate, remaining "Faithful" should be mutual and clear speech, whereas remaining faithful under another definition that's quietly looking to find the blind spots in the faithful "Code" lives more than on the fringe of the "Unfaithful".

It will scramble the mind when some claim having remained faithful simply because they've yet to physically penetrate specific socially protected territories of the human anatomy.

Yet in private moments this same mind will exclude itself form such a code to then further feed "Unlikely" desires with "Ungodly" propaganda that promotes the very thing considered to be sinful.

What many are failing to ask of themselves, is it Gods heart to only raise "Good Actors"? How well does a man go on to perform when his wife begins to believe beyond doubt in her mates unfaithfulness?

Is it truly any REAL wonder why we then go on only to fool ourselves when we try to receive the "Profound Mysteries" of God by way of the comparatives He places before us in human form?

Why is it so hard for so many to fathom the simplicity within the thought "God's desire to have sons"? Within the scope of the unity God conveys, why is it so hard for some to escape the gender or skin color trap?

"Is it only sexual and/or life ending acts as we now know them to be that will lead some to eternal death"?

At what point does any type of sin against someone other than God become a "Deal Breaker"? Are your private thoughts truly only YOUR private thoughts within the realm where its also understood that ALL things that do hold out in the hope of belonging to God truthfully DO "Belong" to Him?

Once again how many faces does "The Suppression of the "Truth" take on in this world? Especially when the Truth has moved ahead in the order for which it was designed to be recognized as a "Person"?

Rom 1:18-20
The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. NIV

Was man NOT part of all that God also made and does man not love as God does in His forewarning of things to come that are also a part of what is True and more real than present circumstances?

Is it safe to continue to assume that all thoughts assumed to be private have failed to affect anyone else in this world? Especially those relationships we trust are going ahead in "Order" to become "Most Meaningful"?

And what is the "Beginning of Wisdom" if as such is NOT also found to abide in "The fear of the Lord"?

How many wives assume that for the sake of God they're also protecting everything God stands for when they know deep in their heart they're married to a closet pervert? Are they truly not protecting their own failings in having chosen poorly for themselves?

Yet we read where some used to sacrifice their children and scoff at their methods of survival....

How far does the arm or wickedness reach when it comes to suppressing what God says is the Truth? Especially when it is known and "Believed" that ALL things will be brought into the light of Truth?

Surely there is a season for everything, yet will everyone survive until such a season comes their way?

And that while showing little regard for the thoughts which God suggest do lead to sinful actions "Taken" once they've been conceived?

If you're going to put something to death, do you put it in a cage and continue to feed it or do you put it in a cage and no longer feed it unto starvation? What about self when you see self and all that self does through the eyes of God?

Why is "Good Counsel" often caged and no longer fed? Why do most spiritual considerations today take on the appearance of a skeletons kept hidden in the closet?

I absolutely loathe when people tell me I think too much. What people fail to WANT to understand is the totality of what their trying to "Frame" and that because of all they've failed to consider. Especially when they fail to consider the content of what "Others" do deeply ponder and try to hold dear in the heart.

That is more dearly than the things this world otherwise tries to promote at every twist and turn in the revealing of itself and the sinful nature it promotes.

Could it all have anything to do with accountability? That place where there's no forethought with regards to how such a supposedly private "Act" (sex) could lead TO such wide spread affects on everyone else around us?

Rom 7:4-6
So, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God.

For when we were controlled by the sinful nature, the sinful passions aroused by the law were at work in our bodies, so that we bore fruit for death. But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.NIV

Isa 51:22-23
This is what your Sovereign LORD says, your God, who defends his people: "See, I have taken out of your hand the cup that made you stagger; from that cup, the goblet of my wrath, you will never drink again. I will put it into the hands of your tormentors, who said to you,'Fall prostrate that we may walk over you.'And you made your back like the ground, like a street to be walked over."
NIV

The dead also have need of being resurrected before the dead can speak. sw

Living in a world where lies suggest "No One gets left behind" is not a reality. sw

What is the difference between "Harsh Reality" and that certain place where only the "Truth can hurt". sw

In terms of being "Reconciled" to another, who gets to decide what the previous conditions dictate. sw

In terms of putting "meat on them bones" and the real reason why skeletons get placed in the proverbial closet, how many are put there for the sake of mutual spiritual maturity. sw

In terms of the "Full" development of a "New Creation", why do some find it more important to investigate the past of another. sw

In terms of making a case study, Satan does his homework not only in the dark, but also the past. sw 

Why is it so important to 'Know" how far back God forgives when you stand in His presence and pray for the sake of your own sins. sw

Who is it that knows more about patterns versus what real change looks like. sw

In terms of persecution, this world is not only filled with jealousy but those who refuse to make room for others in the order that also promotes real change. sw

In terms of the response that's also "Real" there's more to change than certain eye's are willing to meet with. sw