Search This Blog

Wednesday, May 18, 2016

Facing the facts does not mean abusing the "Right"

There's much that could be said about many things, yet choosing to speak only of meaningful things also suggest the redeemable value and profitability of time that's been given. sw

Why do certain things that are discovered in this world prove to be "Phenomenal"?

Wouldn't the depth of the word "Phenomenal" also need to be qualified by the depth of the observer?

Take for example the small child who for the first time finds an acorn on the forest floor?

It doesn't seem to be that big of a deal right? Especially when the child lifts their eyes and sees there are thousands more acorns just like the one in their hand lying every where!

But if you were to ask that child how many tree's they see in that same forest, what then becomes more obvious to someone else who's already "In the Know"?

Does their perspective allow for them to only take inventory of the tree's that are already vertical OR do they stop and consider the enormous potential that are already within the acorn in hand?

In terms of "Innocence" where does its crest meet with the realm of what anyone is assumed to know? When I ask this I'm suggesting looking into a realm of the "Unknown". A place that's been defended for so long in that there's no way possible for it ever to be discovered what others might be thinking at any given moment?

Is it possible to consider God in this same way? God as if also a realm where no man can ever have any hope that's also real of ever finding himself able to look into this said realm in order to simultaneously know what's in the heart of God at any given moment?

Why would a man ever contemplate looking into such a realm, I mean come on we're talking about God here, right?

The same God who also task everyone who suggest they believe in Him to also Be made "Like Him"? Am I still correct so far?

The same God who also said that in the beginning, He made "Man" (Adam) or "Mankind" in His own image?

The same God who tells this said "Mankind" to call no one on earth their "Father"? Is there any wisdom to be gleaned in such a suggestion?

Not if you don't "KNOW" what it is you're also looking for.....

Now if you can, allow yourself to be introduced to the concept of being in "Possession" of an "Identity"?

Is an "Identity" something to be "Possessed" or should it be thought of as such that somehow "Possesses" You?

In terms of one and the same end that's coming and there being only One creator of ALL, exactly how many True Identities can there Be in His eyes?

Are we only talking about "differences between a Pine, Oak and Fig tree? Or are we trying to narrow down individually exactly what it is that gives EACH of them "Life"?

This thing being called "Life" as we NOW know it that as such we've been trained to accept it to be? (Think back on the child in the forest with the single acorn in hand).

Just think how profound many have thought themselves to be and for how long as they go on to do nothing more than "Repeat" what some other fellow being has introduced them to?

How can there be speech that's also TRUE in terms of a "PERSONAL" relationship with One God? A specific type of "Speech" that will also withstand the numerous series of circumstances ONE and the same God also created and forewarns man about?

We can look at the words such as  "Converse" and suggest we understand its depth yet how easy do we forget the origins of such words?

Words LIKE "Convert, Conversion or Conversation" when we not only tell ourselves but try and convince ourselves and others around us that we have understood this medium (Realm) of "spoken words"?

A realm we've been using for how long, yet understand so "Little about? So Little of this potential, especially when we begin to think of a God whose likeness we've been made in as well told to aspire to be Like Him in as many ways as we find ourselves made able to?

And how can we find ourselves within ANYTHING assume to also "Possess" potential without the interaction and full process of the type of Faith God has been explaining and for how long and in how many ways?

How many TRUE models (representations) of Him (God) are there? And why the importance of there being ONLY One  "First borne" among those who "Will" themselves to follow Him?

 Is it still true today what God spoke to One man many many, many years ago?

Gen 4:6-7
Why is your face downcast? If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must master it ."
NIV

2 Cor 5:21-6:1
God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.
NIV

Rom 4:19-25
Without weakening in his faith, he faced the fact that his body was as good as dead — since he was about a hundred years old — and that Sarah's womb was also dead.

Yet he did not waver through unbelief regarding the promise of God, but was strengthened in his faith and gave glory to God, being fully persuaded that God had power to do what he had promised.

This is why "it was credited to him as righteousness."

The words "it was credited to him" were written not for him alone, but also for us, to whom God will credit righteousnessfor us who believe in him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead.

He was delivered over to death for our sins and was raised to life for our justification. 
NIV


Rev 11:15
The seventh angel sounded his trumpet, and there were loud voices in heaven, which said:

"The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ,
and he will reign for ever and ever."
NIV



Grace that is True Grace is the strength provided of God whereas His "Mercy" is the "Why" he gave such to as many who will only believe in Him. sw



No comments:

Post a Comment