Search This Blog

Tuesday, May 30, 2017

What has truly been 'Realized"?



In terms of the proverbial picture that's worth a thousand words, what do you see as if the essence of this video"? Just try watching it without reading the words below this line.            ______________________________________________

Now apply the narrative I've supplied and ask yourself if you agree with what you assume I'm suggesting by way of that "Same" narrative?

Based on the widely accepted definition below is there a type of "Intuitive" application that can not only be observed but also accurately "Applied"? As such that's been based only upon what can be "Seen" within the fashioned video above?

Please take note there are no "Obvious" street markings or red lights that can be seen, yet is that alone enough information to interpret what you do think you see? Also take note of the otherwise tiny dots that are pedestrians who are also crossing the intersection in different picture frames?

Now ask yourself, what is about this video you would personally NEED to see differently in order to accurately assess what you think you DO see in motion?

Enough that is to where this supplied imagery could find its legitimacy if it were tasked with "Proving" a specific point?

A Proven point "Made" as though something more than an "opinion" COULD be offered?

The type of opinion that's based NOT only on what CAN BE SEEN but also by way of what may NOT be seen at the speed in which it's being presented?

How different are our lives? Are they only individual images seen or are the lives we live out a series of pictures set in motion?

And that without the ability to play what has been seemingly captured at ANY chosen speed, namely "Fast Forwarded"? And much less being seen for what it is when played in "Reverse"?

The totality of life is often referred to as the "Bigger Picture" when trying to prove a more finite point, yet what is more often heard when a particular picture frame has seemingly been dissected from a bigger picture that's also otherwise constantly in Motion?

How many individual images have need of being "Seen" before the one observing those same images begins to grasp the commonality that can also be observed once those many individual images have been set in motion?

Why the more recent hype and/or focus upon 'Selfies"? Why the historical focus placed upon seeing self within a group picture taken of "Many"?

In term of timing and the divine order of ALL things that also apply to ALL mankind, "Why" is it the narrative (biography) of some of the most important people in history do NOT also have a personal picture that can also be associated?

Truly what has the "Imag-ination of mere men been formed from?

How powerful has the image become in light of a seemingly slow fade away from the need for the Truthful narrative?

In terms of a perceived Intuition" do pictures speak a thousand words? To then place the double burden on that response with, "Do pictures also speak a thousand "Truthful" words when taking the supplied narrative into 'Account"?

And exactly why do men suggest their own eyes can play tricks on them?

Eyes that can play tricks while in possession of ears that can and do taste words?

Job 12:11
Does not the ear test words as the tongue tastes food?
NIV

What part of a man also processes all of his said "Intel"? The same type of "Intel" he's historically relied upon having come by way of his natural 5 senses which then further promotes the same type of "Intelligence" many refer to as 'Wisdom"?

Wisdom from where though, 'Above or below"?

Rom 8:16-17
The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God's children. Now if we are children, then we are heirs — heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory.
NIV

All the above having experienced the similar suggestion where a passing scent is capable of interfering with the sense of ones taste or making them momentarily nauseous or ill minded should that same scent finds itself serving at the whim of a simultaneously conjured "Bad Memory"?

Are the 5 senses of the body also a part of the same body the Apostle Paul suggest he had to metaphorically beat into submission? Or did Paul have to retrain his mindset so that those same God given senses could then be found serving the spirit of The Lord?

And what does the divine renewal of the mind "Entail"?

All the above said, How does a man find himself "Believing" what has only been spoken of" by an otherwise invisible presence? To then try and truthfully make sense of a God that says of His person that He IS SPIRIT?

The same type of spirit the flesh in and of itself is NOT capable of Inheriting? And if NOT the flesh what part of a man is left to inherit ANYTHING God who is spirit has also supplied?

And that while considering the "Power" of any mans testimony that has ONLY to do with ALL that is True?

Does a picture alone also provide sufficient context in order to explain why only certain things may or may NOT be seen for all that they ARE in the sight of God?

3 John 8
We ought therefore to show hospitality to such men so that we may work together for the truth .
NIV

2 Cor 13:7-9
7 Now we pray to God that you will not do anything wrong. Not that people will see that we have stood the test but that you will do what is right even though we may seem to have failed. For we cannot do anything against the truth, but only for the truth .

We are glad whenever we are weak but you are strong; and our prayer is for your perfection.

NIV


How many have heard of and seen the Kingdom of God, yet only as though from afar? And how many have been allowed to enter that kingdom based on all they've chosen to believe to BE TRUE about that same kingdom?

What type of man is it who can claim to know more about the Kingdom that is ONLY in heaven who seems to know even less about the territory and rightful property here on earth that also belongs to that same kingdom in heaven?

The same kingdom Christ has made known that is within those who HAVE believed?

And what does being away from the Lord in BODY suggest? On vacation? Away on "Sabbatical"?

And what is it about this world that could somehow spiritually chain his soul to the likeliness of the images that belong to this World?

Those same images THIS world has provided? The narratives about those same images that have been "Re-worded" and then "Altered"?


in·tu·i·tion
ˌint(y)o͞oˈiSH(ə)n/
noun
  1. the ability to understand something immediately, without the need for conscious reasoning.

    "we shall allow our intuition to guide us"
    • a thing that one knows or considers likely from instinctive feeling rather than conscious reasoning.
      plural noun: intuitions

      "your insights and intuitions as a native speaker are positively sought"
      synonyms:hunch, feeling (in one's bones), inkling, (sneaking) suspicion, ideasensenotion










Thursday, May 25, 2017

A reliable source of Information, is it TRULY a gift from God many are willing to LOOK into?

In terms of some who have to rely upon the certainties that seem to revolve around the "Unknowns" in this world , how many find this realm to be a safe place in which they can try and hide. sw

Is there a true reason why the "Bigger Picture" always proves to be more than mans physical eyes are able to see. sw

What type of scenario proves true when a mans physical eyes grow weak his spiritual ears in turn grow strong in order so that his spiritual eyes can see more? sw

To which natural sense does any physical distraction present its appeal in terms of proving spiritual intuition to be inadequate? sw

If a man were to accept and in turn "Know" that all of his complexities reside in his soul, where would he then turn for counsel for his own soul. sw

Truly what is "Oversight" without the type of perspective that can see further then the eyes can. sw

I wanted to touch on a few things that have and still are proving to be of great importance.

Of great importance to interpret not only "Where the thoughts of my heart and mind seem to lead me in any given day" but also "Why" they can and do remain sufficient enough to lead me ANYWHERE as if their mutual assessment(s) being offered have matured enough to be trustworthy?

In terms of there truly being difference between worldly oriented 'Logic" and spiritual (discernment) how is it possible to seemingly draw a line between the two in terms of drawing a comparison?

That is to suggest at which end of ones state of awareness does the "Renewal of the Mind" begin much less 'End" in terms of "Fruition"?

Anywhere to more than suggest "Somewhere" I also Truly "Want" to Go?

What is it about the type of results whenever you do find yourself somewhere you don't wish to be?

I personally consider it worthy of asking "Is there such a thing as God preparing "You"? If yes, preparing you or I for what?

And when I suggest God having prepared "You, that should also agree with something done in "Advance"?

How many have heard at some moment in time their inner voice suggest, "I didn't SEE this one coming"? I'm of the opinion that if you haven't to date, "You Will"! Otherwise You KNOW all things too well!

And what is "Imperfection" if NOT the very thing that requires being accurately "Defined"? Defined maybe, yet defined by "Whom" and how "Precise"?

Now if you can allow it, "Does God require anything being accomplished on this side of eternity?
If you answered "Yes" "What" does God require?

And if you answered Yes and do NOT know what God does require, why should you then assume you have any real "Clue" you will ever Truly discover "WHY" you are wherever it is you then "Find yourself within a "Particular" set of circumstances?

Some might even suggest a certain type of 'Scenario"....

Ever truly looked into the word Deja vu?

Please keep in mind I have no clue who wrote these words below in terms of their origin NOR did I draft these words below on my own, I've simply borrowed from what they are attempting to "Convey".

"Déjà Vu" is a common intuitive experience that has happened to many of us. The expression is derived from the French, meaning "already seen." When it occurs, it seems to spark our memory of a place we have already been, a person we have already seen, or an act we have already done. It is a signal to pay special attention to what is taking place, perhaps to receive a specific lesson in a certain area or complete what is not yet finished.

Having read the above what if a person WERE to truly and deeply consider the SOURCE from which they WERE derived (origins)? And as such even if ONLY in part?

Think about it having been given enough TIME, does't each part of all that a man is also have a history? Meaning his (mans) 3 part being (spirit, body & soul)?

And if each part does have a history, exactly how far back or "Forward" does any of those three parts also have access to NOT only in terms of remembrance but the remembrance of what?

Where were you before you found yourself here and where is it you CLAIM to be returning to? As if where you were BEFORE you were here? Are you only being asked about the whereabouts of your body in any given moment in time?

John 14:25-27
"All this I have spoken while still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you

Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid. 

NIV

Not only why, but how could it be suggested 'Wake Up oh sleeper so that Christ Can shine upon you"?

And where was the spirit of God before having been "Placed In You or I"? Was that spirit a part of who God is before creation? Was that same spirit kept in darkness while also being a part of God before being 'Dispensed"?

To then TRULY consider (Having Believed) that it is the Spirit of God within that testifies WITH our spirit? As if Two who 'Agree"?

The same spirit many claim to have received upon "Regeneration" (Having been Born again and as such OF GOD)? 

Should God have need of Communicating with those whom ARE His OWN, how would He (god) convey and with clarity whatever it is He also has to say?

Some might suggest "Through" the bible (Holy Words), yet how has that also historically played out in terms of how many and how much ANY man, women or child has also deeply "Investigated" those same words as though "God were Speaking directly to their person"?

And those same words as compared to "WHAT"? Not only  in terms of their TRUE "Potential", but their TRUE potential for what 'REASON"?

Now try and truthfully revisit the why anyone seemingly loves to BOLDY----> PRO-claim not only their own imperfection as if an excuse for all they've done while here on earth?

Did Jesus only preach "Christ" crucified and resurrected or was this event intended to "Reintroduce" the Kingdom Of God to those who've been blinded in their 'Soul" concerning what is TRUE beyond ones present 'Sight"?


Having clearly stated what HAS BEEN, why then should any man show any REAL concern for ALL that has been done while in his mortal body?pro

Is there a reason why whenever God does speak of  more certain things that do revolve around 'Whatever you've set your heart to do" he also further comments about same as "Having been done been Done through His person, namely the "Christ"?

What is the type of pursuit that includes having to revisit much of the information that may have only been spoken, heard and/or read "Once" and in a particular "Way"? The same type that needs zero improvement in its complete interpretation?

Does divine interpretation only mean, Once upon a time? Once upon a Place? Once beyond the place of True "Reason"? And what does the testing of ones Faith in the ONE true God then appear as if "Once upon a time" when you THOUGHT you heard the voice of His spirit speak is THAT PLACE?

I personally had to find myself willing to accept and face having found myself in a position of being questioned with things such as"Who told you what you think you Know to be true"? There nearly always seems to be at least one in every crowd.

How do you within your heart consider the type of  person who announces in advance what they're about to say, 'Let me be the devils advocate in this instance"?

I personally do NOT think that in this world the devil needs a recruiter! Why? Because he already has more than enough "Volunteers"!

Often times the above type of questions followed up with question that might sound like, "And where are Those who told you NOW? Were those who informed "You" also righteous men and woman of God?

Is there a difference between the two? If "Yes", what is the difference and how did you discern in those moments?

As if to suggest, "Who" was it that provided the seed I assumed had been planted within me and when was I to expect to see the "Fruit" of all that I have believed to be True that has been planted?

It was as if being lead to the "Ultimate Question...."When will the harvest be"?

And if I've NOT seen any fruit to date, what should I then assume is also True that I've merely been told?

I've said all this to hopefully convey a type of encouragement. The type of encouragement that can ONLY be seen as encouragement once it's been accepted there is such a thing as "Spiritual Challenge(s)" for those who are "In Christ"!

And what is ANY challenge without also truthfully having recognized the entanglement of 'Obligation"?

Rom 4:4-6
Now when a man works, his wages are not credited to him as a gift, but as an obligation . However, to the man who does not work but trusts God who justifies the wicked, his faith is credited as righteousness. David says the same thing when he speaks of the blessedness of the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works:
NIV

If David was found to be worthy in his wisdom above having been quoted from the book of Psalms, then why would he also NOT be found to be wise in having spoken the following in another place?

Ps 1:2-3
But his delight is in the law of the LORD, and on his law he meditates day and night. 
He is like a tree planted by streams of water, which yields its fruit in season 
and whose leaf does not wither.Whatever he does prospers. NIV

Will the greatest of those obligation prove to be the full investment of "ALL of ones heart, mind, soul and strength" yet in what direction? And as such to then be considered having been "Filled" by the Holy Spirit enough to also prove who is speaking in ANY God Given Moment?

It's one thing to suggest having employed someone else to do a job who will also prove to have been fully invested, yet how much of this same type of investment also gets "Internalized" without self somehow getting directly "Involved" and more than probable "In the Way"?

As if to suggest it an obligation or place of expectancy where one's doings looks like one who's "Doing ALL things as if unto the Lord"?

It's one thing to fall short of the glory of God because of what is "Impossible", yet how short does anyone also "Fall short" having declared they'vs claimed their right to one and the same inheritance?

God says what Counts is a NEW CREATION, yet what if New involved the continued retelling of what this newness also would appear as? And what is a prophecy that does NOT manifest as God says it would?

To then truthfully consider the need of the Holy Spirit, and as such without also being "filled" with the Holy Spirit? In terms of Two becoming One, at what point do the words of God also agree with His spirit? As if One also within a chosen vessel?

And as such in what form that does NOT also dwell among mere men as if fulfilling of a continued purpose?

And what does any man deem as the impossible without also FIRST being shown that "Anything is possible If God is also for it?

And what has been inherited from God if Not EVERY WORD that has come from His mouth? And as such "untainted"?

Is there a TRUE reason why a spiritual endowment does NOT have anything to do with our physical prowess? The type of prowess whose exchange rate more often proves to have little to zero dollar value within the divine economy?

Don't ask me How I know" yet somehow I do know deep within "I'm NOT alone in this assessment"?

As simply a side note, I'll attempt to introduce a thought pattern here in the form of a question, Is there a difference between a "Judgement" that's being 'Passed" and an "Assessment" that's been "Made"?

Without the way being made clear to the Throne room of Grace where Grace has been provided access to, who then has ANY ..True Hope?

Whereas IF the way to the throne room of grace has been made clear, who then is found unworthy if ONLY the sinner is prohibited from entering into that throne room in order to FIND the Grace Needed in order to somehow accomplish what God has set before all men to somehow do?

And what if the ONLY type of doing God desires is to "Believe" in the One He has sent in order to justify those who are otherwise considered to be 'Wicked"?

And how many have truly asked what Did Christ accomplish if NOT as an example to be followed? Yet who gets to determine when the ORIGINAL pattern gets deviated?

The image here might be where some "Criminal" had just been made by the "Cops" having observed this person mingling in a crowded environment.

Years ago I finally grew tired "Enough" of arguing at nearly every turn with "Self" as well remaining frustrated about "Uncertain things" in this world, especially while trying to seek out those who might or should know better about the things of God than I do.

Especially when being Honest with self in terms of a pursuit that at best was producing "Vague' results!

As with anything I think a person needs to know what the qualifications are that also define just about everything a man is curious about. Some might even consider what I'm suggesting in a different 'Way" to be the finding of 'Facts'?

As this inquiry began to unfold I had to finally reach a frame of mind where I could truly assess what I assumed I DID know to be true about the Lord and just as important the things I was NOT thoroughly convinced about His person.

One of the "First" things I discovered as if part of this "Framework" that had no clear "Image" within it that also vexed my soul was the consideration as to 'Where" I should "Look for God"?

Common sense being everything that it's NOT at times, it struck me like a lightning bolt!

It hit me in the form of a question that suggested, "How was I ever to know beyond doubt that I was at least on the "Right" set of tracks while looking for something or someone if I had no clue what same also 'Looked Like"?

Sometime later I found myself watching an old movie about 'Sherlock Holmes". In this movie his side kick Dr Watson had just been addressed as 'Brilliant" having stated the supposedly "Obvious" after having so profoundly stated "That was a girl"!

To then hear Sherlock respond with "Brilliant Deduction"!

Don't ask why, but I've since taken hold of those two words and vowed their substantive nature to be something I could build upon!

So, here I am many years later as I find myself still seeking the Lord at nearly every turn of nearly every day.....

Below are a few of the things I have discovered in my pursuit to date which depict the TYPE of personage I NEED to find as well a few consideration that allow me in a given moment to KNOW what I do find is NOT always what is True......and how much of "That" because only God can truly define ALL that Love is?

And what is the Grace that is of God and who can find? And as such without Knowing who love is or what it is any man has need of 'Doing" in order to find "Same" in his life time!

And what are YOU looking for while TRUTHFULLY assessing same at every turn?

Your type of God or "Whomever" it is you want to believe?

What is any man or woman unless Christ has not only been conceived, but even greater completely formed within the bowels of all that God considers "Spiritual'?

Spoken like a true Father or one that is also One with the Father and in turn one seen as a prophet of that same 'God and Father"?

And what does a prophet that is Of God admit to, confess and acknowledge as such that God has NOT said? And who is it that has also "Inspired" what has been 'Said" in this 'World'?

Gal 4:19-20
My dear children, for whom I am again in the pains of childbirth until Christ is formed in you , 20 how I wish I could be with you now and change my tone, because I am perplexed about you!
NIV







Luke 16:14-15
The Pharisees, who loved money, heard all this and were sneering at Jesus. He said to them, "You are the ones who justify yourselves in the eyes of men, but God knows your hearts. What is highly valued among men is detestable in God's sight. NIV


John 14:6-7
Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

If you really knew me, you would know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him."  
NIV


1 John 4:7-12
Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God.

Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love . This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. 10

This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins.

Dear friends, since God so loved us, we also ought to love one another. No one has ever seen God; but if we love one another, God lives in us and his love is made complete in us.
NIV

If there were NO NEED to judge no other much less yourself, what ground could this mindset stand on in suggesting such a thing? Especially while honestly suggesting to 'Self' the verdict of Gods judgement has ALREADY been handed 'Down" to all mankind.


And that verdict in advance of what some are presently refusing to truthfully judge as if for Themselves?

John 3:19-21
9 This is the verdict : Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil.

Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.

But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God."  
NIV







Wednesday, May 17, 2017

"ONE" Step Forward

Is divine meaning truly defined only when a man is quoted? Why is anyone found worthy of being quoted in the midst of a wicked generation sw

Why is any mans narrative concerning what he's seen or heard in turn found worthy of being altered or changed? And how does any soul also weigh True Authority? sw

How much of what comes from a mans own mouth somehow escapes all that his own ears then hear? To then claim to cling to the blessedness of all that God has said. sw

Ps 141:5
Let a righteous man  strike me — it is a kindness; let him rebuke me — it is oil on my head.
My head will not refuse it.

NIV

Rom 4:4-12
Now when a man works, his wages are not credited to him as a gift, but as an obligation.

However, to the man who does not work but trusts God who justifies the wicked, his faith is credited as righteousness. 

David says the same thing when he speaks of the blessedness of the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works:

"Blessed are they whose transgressions are forgiven, whose sins are covered.
Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will never count against him."  

Is this blessedness only for the circumcised, or also for the uncircumcised?

We have been saying that Abraham's faith was credited to him as righteousness.

Under what circumstances was it credited?

Was it after he was circumcised, or before? It was not after, but before

And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised.

So then, he is the father of all who believe but have not been circumcised, in order that righteousness might be credited to them.

And he is also the father of the circumcised who not only are circumcised but who also walk in the footsteps of the faith that our father Abraham had before he was circumcised. NIV

Who has truthfully considered what takes place when the Lord comes for the after affects in having personally visited mankind? To then truthfully consider same as if everything that was also highly esteemed and in turn "Effectually" communicated. sw

Is there a true reason why Elihu was NOT admonished by the Lord? Having also spoken in the sight of God? And who is it within ANY man at ANY time that must also weigh spoken words in order to determine what is "Right'?


Heb 8:10-12
This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time, declares the Lord.

I will put my laws in their minds and write them on their hearts .

I will be their God, and they will be my people.

No longer will a man teach his neighbor, or a man his brother, saying, 'Know the Lord,'
because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest.

For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more."  
NIV



Job 32:6-9
So Elihu son of Barakel the Buzite said:

"I am young in years, and you are old;
that is why I was fearful, not daring to tell you what I know.
7 I thought, 'Age should speak; advanced years should teach wisdom.'

But it is the spirit in a man,
the breath of the Almighty, that gives him understanding. 

It is not only the old who are wise, not only the aged who understand what is right.
NIV


Job 42:1-7
2:1 Then Job replied to the LORD:

2 "I know that you can do all things ; no plan of yours can be thwarted.

3[You asked,] 'Who is this that obscures my counsel without knowledge?'
Surely I spoke of things I did not understand, things too wonderful for me to know.

4["You said,] 'Listen now, and I will speak; I will question you and you shall answer me.'
My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.

Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes."

7 After the LORD had said these things to Job, he said to Eliphaz the Temanite, "I am angry with you and your two friends, because you have not spoken of me what is right, as my servant Job has.

NIV


Ps 37:30-31
The mouth of the righteous man utters wisdom, and his tongue speaks what is just. The law of his God is in his heart; his feet do not slip. 
NIV


Matt 12:35-37
35 The good man brings good things out of the good stored up in him, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in him.

But I tell you that men will have to give account on the day of judgment for every careless word they have spoken.

For by your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be condemned."

NIV

In terms of a narrative that also has impact and a specific type of influence, what type of content and how lengthy is any mans testimony that is Only about what is considered to be "Good"?


Eph 4:29
Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers. KJV

Philem 4-7
I thank my God, making mention of thee always in my prayers,

Hearing of thy love and faith, which thou hast toward the Lord Jesus, and toward all saints;

That the communication of thy faith may become effectual by the acknowledging of every good thing which is in you in Christ Jesus.

For we have great joy and consolation in thy love, because the bowels of the saints are refreshed by thee, brother.
KJV

Eph 1:3
Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: KJV

Matt 19:17
"Why do you ask me about what is good ?" Jesus replied. "There is only One who is good . If you want to enter life, obey the commandments."
NIV

Is there such a thing as a divine "Rhetorical Question"? If Yes, how so in light of the over abundance of answers so many are trying to sell in this world. sw

I would like to think we've all sought out the depth of meaning of many words in our individual lives, yet how many seek out the meaning of words as if reaching beyond their external "Application"?

As if the culture of a specific language also has certain "Laws" that govern that particular languages righteous application?

Have you ever assumed you knew beyond doubt all there was to know about a word and it's application and later find there's much more that's been entrusted to those words?

In example, how many have assumed to know ALL that needs to BE known in terms employing the day to day use of a word to then hear someone apply that same word in a totally "Different" (foreign) context?

In the moment some might find the need to be critical of that words "Inaccurate" application but also correct the person who spoke those words?

To then later revisit the definition only to find out what?

That your individual interpretation of the word in question still stands and the accusation of "Word Butcher"was "Justified"?

Have you ever found the limits of what you do know struggling for the right words?

Maybe struggling in an effort to share a more recent (clearer) image that has "Come to Mind"? As if something "New" you've quite possibly seen for the First time that's proving hard to somehow explain?

Some might even try and associate the word "Epiphany"?

Have you ever looked into the type of being God has considered and found there's a huge difference between Gods version and your own? A particular application of words HE (God) has chosen in order to depict the spirited nature of the One He's describing?

Consider the following, when many today suggest they're nothing more than a "Sinner" saved by "Grace"?

The same ones who insist on holding on to their gender specific associations? Much like birds of the same feather many believers also jokingly suggest "Flock" together?

All the above in the light of what? What God's words clearly states and to those who are claiming to believe Gods word(s)?

Gal 4:7
So you are no longer a slave, but a son; and since you are a son, God has made you also an heir
NIV

No longer a slave, yet a slave to "What'? A slave to "Fear" maybe, yet the fear of what?

What does the type of being look like who are also making the conscious choice to live beneath the promised "Inheritance"? The type of inheritance many are also trying to claim they know all there is that has need of being made "Known" as if also the timing of the Lord in ALL that He does?

Is anyone's Trust in the Lord based ONLY upon what each suggest to "Self" they know to be True that concerns His spirited person? Or does trust truly trust one that is "Unknown" beyond doubt?

And what does absolute acceptance also convey as under the terms that trail behind the word "IF"?

John 17:3
Now this is eternal life : that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.
NIV


Acts 2:15-21
15 These men are not drunk, as you suppose. It's only nine in the morning! No, this is what was spoken by the prophet Joel:

17 "'In the last days , God says,
I will pour out my Spirit on all people. 
Your sons and daughters will prophesy, 
your young men will see visions, 
your old men will dream dreams. 

Even on my servants, both men and women,
I will pour out my Spirit in those days,
and they will prophesy.

I will show wonders in the heaven above
and signs on the earth below,
blood and fire and billows of smoke.
20 The sun will be turned to darkness
and the moon to blood
before the coming of the great and glorious day of the Lord.
And everyone who calls 
on the name of the Lord will be saved.'  
NIV


And exactly how does the type of faith that's also pleasing to God also somehow manifest on its "Own"? As if to suggest on One God given day God is willing and the next He's withdrawn that same spirit?

Can the spirit within somehow be felt?

Somehow "Felt" as if by way of the same feelings (senses) the soul has a history of relying upon when making decisions? And who does NOT also need Training having come from the womb with a soul that's also spiritually "Blind"?

As such while trying to make the determination as to whether or not the words of God are somehow 'Empty" verses trustworthy?

Empty to suggest as to whether or NOT those type of words spoken by the spirit are words are worthy of being "Obeyed? And what if there are "No Words' that have been securely planted within a person? Word that can be revisited and brought to Life?

The type of venue within, where "Two" have also become as though ONE when considering what has or has NOT been planted? And that ONLY by way of surveying the type of Growth realized since having been planted in that "Place"?

To then truthfully consider the same type of man whose yet to somehow convince his hand picked 'Wife" he's not only "Right" but worthy of BEING more than merely heard and then "Ignored"?

The same type of wisdom which suggest the type of man that "Loves" himself who will also love His wife as if Himself?

The type of struggle (suffering) where emotions, feelings and or present "Mood" (state of mind) ALL weigh in on the ultimate decisions reached by all mankind?

To then truthfully reconsider the external visual affects of this same internal growth process over the years of "Supposedly" religiously continued "Practice"?

Ps 69:1-11

Save me, O God, for the waters have come up to my neck.

I sink in the miry depths, where there is no foothold.
I have come into the deep waters; the floods engulf me.

I am worn out calling for help my throat is parched.
My eyes fail,looking for my God.

Those who hate me without reason outnumber the hairs of my head;
many are my enemies without cause, those who seek to destroy me.
I am forced to restore what I did not steal. 

You know my folly, O God; my guilt is not hidden from you.

May those who hope in you not be disgraced because of me,
O Lord, the LORD Almighty; may those who seek you not be put to shame because of me,
O God of Israel. For I endure scorn for your sake, and shame covers my face.

I am a stranger to my brothers, an alien to my own mother's sons;
for zeal for your house consumes me, and the insults of those who insult you fall on me. 

When I weep and fast, I must endure scorn; when I put on sackcloth, people make sport of me.
NIV


Monday, May 1, 2017

Outsourced Obligation (Part II)

Is the measuring 'Rod" in the hand of the Lord only about the failure of a mutual type of imperfection many are so freely claiming or the accurate measurement of a type of refusal to be purchased at a set price. sw

What if the following were Not being observed as if Jesus is speaking these same words today?

As if nothing has changed within the mind of the Lord since having spoken these same words?

John 18:20-21
"I have spoken openly to the world," Jesus replied. "I always taught in synagogues or at the temple, where all the Jews come together. 

said nothing in secret. 

Why question me

Ask those who heard me. Surely they know what I said."  NIV

In what type of synagogue or temple does the voice of Christ speak today? As if the echo of His voice that's still being heard verbatim today?

Will location or an street address prove to be where the power of God is revealed? To whom has any man also been 'Assembled" (enjoined) together with?

Is there a TRUE difference that also stands between the "Physical" assembly of a people claiming to belong to God and those who've truthfully been "Enjoined" by way of ONE and the same Holy Spirit?

Why the confusion about a type of people who are also a "Most Certain" type of people God is depicting by way of His spoken words?

To whom and what does it change as to whether or NOT this said type of people is referring to their engendered orientation or the genealogy of their since "Labeled" physical 'Being"?

Is there a True reason why today in order to somehow choose the "Right God" it's also seems to require DIFFERENT types of marketing of the attributes of His personage?

Only then does the God whose seemingly been brought into question then finds that He's been found as though "The One TRUE God"?

Why the elevated importance (sensitivity) today towards who gets labeled as what in this world and as such by WHOM? Does God somehow fail to spiritually label HIS chosen people?

If the creator can NOT be touched or handled, what would prove to be the next best thing in terms of somehow harming what does belong to the Lord?

As if a father speaking to his children, has the sound or tone of his voice somehow changed? A type change in the sound or tone that might somehow indicate a change in his "Mood" or His original purpose and intent?

Is God moody as are men who are often "Influenced" by sources who are also 'Outside" of who God truly Is?

Does the ebb and flow of Christ words that are also a reflection of His living will somehow change like the mysterious missed direction of the wind?

What is the REAL danger in somehow trying to "Mimic" anything and what gets lost in this type of approach?

To then honestly suggest to the judgment seat of SELF that ONLY God is capable of judging what is REAL and/or "Authentic"? Authentic to also suggest having been "Authored" by the One and Only True God?

And what does the "Author" of anything that's been 'Scripted" (prescribed) also look like?

The words below are revealing yet only when spirit of God does the revealing. Is there a difference between having received "a spirit" verses "The Spirit"?

That spirit spoken of being The Spirit of sonship Only God can provide?

Rom 8:12-17
Therefore, brothers, we have an obligation — but it is not to the sinful nature, to live according to it.

 For if you live according to the sinful nature, you will diebut if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will livebecause those who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God . 

For you did not receive a spirit that makes you a slave again to fear, but you received the Spirit of sonship.

And by him we cry, "Abba,  Father." The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God's children. 

Now if we are children, then we are heirs — heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory.
NIV


Is man NOT capable of setting to sail an object in order to determine the "Prevailing" winds present direction?

Does the sound and tone of the voice of Christ only reach out to those who profess they've believed only that He exist?

Exactly what is it within ANY man that's also "Alive and Active" that could possibly convince him that the Lord is willing to not only be a lamp unto his feet and type of light that is capable of lighting ONLY the righteous "Path"?

Why isn't there a "More Certain" type follow up question also being asked, "Is only believing that Christ exist 'Enough"?

Enough for what though? As if somehow accomplishing something in order to somehow one day get reimbursed for what has been "Done"?

Some might suggest this type of "Approach"  to be a sufficient start or a beginning, yet is that also "Enough"?

Is the apex of having believed "In Christ" only that He as Lord "Exist" and is "Capable" of many miraculous things?

Or 'Will" a meaningful existence prove to be having "Come to Life"? Having come to Life to mean what and to 'Whom" though?

To whom to also interpret because "Only In Christ" is there a "Truthful Existence"? The type of existence that in this day has yet to be proved to be "Everlasting"?

Exactly "Who" is it The Lord also intended to "Prove" by way of word and deeds the word "Everlasting" and the type of thought life to be associated with it are also worth 'Pursuing"?

Exactly how powerful is the type of thought 'Life" within ANY person if those same thoughts have been "Misinformed"? And that by way of having been "Outsourced"?

What is it about a written letter that could allow time and its content to somehow sway the impact of words that have also seemingly 'Aged'?

What do words such as "Ancient" also try to conjure within the soul guided reality (realm) of any man?

Exactly what is it in terms of power within ANY household when the father of that household has and/or IS being observed as though 'Dead and Gone'?

Was Abraham the ONLY spiritually appointed guardian within the House of God?

How is it possible for a man to accept what was said of Abraham as if the father of this same type of faith to then somehow "Over Look" the depth of the words of an Apostle who is ONLY being reported to have been APPOINTED by the otherwise invisible "Spirit Of Christ"?

Gal 4:19-20
My dear children, for whom I am again in the pains of childbirth until Christ is formed in you, how I wish I could be with you now and change my tonebecause I am perplexed about youNIV

And as such based on "All" that this type of person may or may NOT somehow presently (physically) find their selves capable of "Seeing"?

To be continued....see part III


Outsourced Obligation (Part III)

The Continuation and conclusion of "Outsourced Obligation"....(Parts I & II)

If you can allow it, "Let God Be True" even if ONLY for a moment and allow the RIGHTEOUS type of question ONLY God can ask to be asked?

In terms of "What Good Is any type of Brother' what good and eternal purpose is a True Brother in the Lord if these TYPE of brothers are rarely be "Found'?

Especially if the ones who are in NEED of the type of counsel of a TRUE brother in the Lord are the Varied ONES who are also somehow randomly deciding who those brothers are or NOT? And as such based on "What"?

And if Jesus is the ONLY type of (perfected) brother who can fill such a void, is it any REAL wonder WHY the self proclaimed "Brethren" who've been entrusted with the words of the Lord today are Not only being found, but also found to BE TRUST WORTHY?

Whose asking the type of Righteous of questions ONLY the Lord can attest to? And if NOT..... 'Why Not"?

As if also something precious to behold ONLY because of the mutual & truthful consideration where both can ONLY be observed in the "Sight of God?

In case its already been forgotten here it CLEARLY is once more for OUR mutual consideration.

John 18:20-21
"I have spoken openly to the world," Jesus replied. "I always taught in synagogues or at the temple, where all the Jews come together. 

said nothing in secret. Why question meAsk those who heard me. Surely they know what I said."  NIV

Many today are also proving to be the same type of "Beings"...

The same type yet who is it that are NOT inquiring as to 'WHY"?

 Many today that have also somehow been "Convinced" and for as "Many" different reasons those who are trying to observe the street address of their local (assemblies) synagogues, temple or "Place of Worship" as though "The Place of Assembly".

This same often misunderstood (they) type are also Trying as though desperately to somehow (as though a mystery) to find a type of chosen people (of Gods choosing), yet are these same people also asking ALL the "Right" questions?

Why is the question that ONLY has to do with the manifestation of the Holy Spirit rarely being "Observed" in these type of "Housing Projects"?

Is there a True reason why many DO faithfully GO TO said Church instead of bringing the church WITH their person when meeting?

Why is fellowship that's also IN CHRIST more the topic based 'Coversations" that have more to do with Baseball, Hot dogs, Apple Pie and Who's driving the Mercedes parked out front?

Is there such a thing today under the divine terms of ALL that is True that can also TRUTHFULLY explain WHY a type of Christianity in a particular WAY of life is NOT also Producing the manifestation which then evidences ALL that Jesus DID and DOES still Teach?

Is it only a matter of WHOSE power it is that WILL also produce this same likeness?

Why isn't it being emphasized exactly "Whose" inspired words ARE being taught today instead of allowing nearly any type of personage to broadcast what the Christ has said to be TRUE?

Is it ONLY about who is perfect which then determines who becomes the evidenced Teacher? If Yes then NO ONE could be found speaking ALL that is True could they?

At what point does or has the depth of the word Faithful also lose it's added value?

And if there is no power in what's being "Taught" not only in this land but among those who call upon the NAME of the LORD why isn't it then being truthfully considered and the TRUTHFUL inquiry made unto THE ONLY ONE who can TRUTHFULLY respond?

AND those type of responses as though those responses are without a doubt OF GOD?

And if the evidence does NOT prove those same words, why are those words being not only seemingly continued as thought 'Mimed" as though no longer applicable and/or seemingly "Powerless"...Today?

To then TRUTHFULLY consider ALL that God says FAITH IN HIS PERSON brings to PASS?

A type of words being (witnessed) seen for WHO they have NOT accurately REPRESENTED and WHY? Could it be the USE of those SAME words are being seen for who they have NOT accurately REPRESENTED? and as such because there is NO EVIDENCE that's found to be 'Believable"?

As if TRUTHFUL CONTEXT, why IS it NOT also being asked 'Exactly whose House does any persons words come from" as though an extension of the ONE who is SPEAKING (Ambassador)?

Is Peter addressing the world as we now know it in what he has said OR was he addressing an assembly of people who confessed they ALL presently call upon the power of the Lord to deliver them?

In terms of the "Vision' of mere men, how much of what God is doing today is being affected by how well they (man) has clearly understood (or NOT) what the future God also controls is going to look like?

1 Peter 4:11
If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God ; if any man minister, let him do it as of the ability which God giveth: that God in all things may be glorified through Jesus Christ, to whom be praise and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
KJV

Instead of TRUTHFULLY acknowledging who a man is NOT and as such because of what that man is NOT in and of himself capable of bringing into Manifestation, who's being truthful with whom and ABOUT ...WHOM in terms of the ONE who HAS BEEN doing the TEACHING all along the proverbial WAY....or NOT?

And that being evidenced by WAY of all that's being not only Spoken, yet taught within the boundaries of a divine protocol as though ALL TRUE?

And what is being defined as though within a GODLY TYPE of conversation as though discussing an angel of God if not also a type ministering spirit and a faithful messenger that IS OF GOD? To then ask of these type of conversations, exactly WHO is also being "CONVERTED'?

Ezek 10:5
The sound of the wings of the cherubim could be heard as far away as the outer courtlike the voice of God Almighty when he speaks .
NIV

Is it possible that something that has a history of being a "Great Mystery" could also convey a type of hope that's also real? Real enough to where those listening years later also find that SAME mystery "Believable" within ANY given day that yet to be TRUTHULLY defined by way of ALL that God has also TRIUMPHANTLY declared?

I once had the thought come to mind when discussing life matters with yet another "One" of my children as to whether or not there is an expiration date on the definition of the word 'Believe"?

I would like to think there are still a few words in the English language that are unyielding in terms of compromise, yet the systemic nature of Western culture seems to have 'Caved" under the pressures exerted by "Postmodernism".

The word "Believe" is yet one more of those type of words of late that seems nearly impossible to nail down it's definition. My personal findings in saying that because of the individual(s) being asked historical life studies that have been Taught in a particular order (indoctrinated)

Unlike the systemic nature of mathematics (as though a universal language that doesn't seem to be willing to change), words in this age seem to have inherited a whole "New" set of "Rights".

Rights to suggest a certain type of liberty or freedom that's been "Given" in increasing measure to then strongly suggest that whatever the hearer chooses to "make of it" as if a recreational drug of choice which then finds and gainfully employs the addict.

Then having been employed within the specific venue of defending the spirited essence (infrastructure/foundations) of whatever it is they've been taught (justification)

 In terms of "Giving Away" verses something "Taken" much like when a person tries to explain how they lost their own identity within a personal relationship, do you think that type of loss is possible when considering the relationship any culture then enjoins as if "One" type of "Language"?

Not only One language, yet a type of language that's also mutually "Understood" by way of adherence to the far reaches of its original of "Intent".

Not that anyone "Needs' more to think about these days, but if you find time maybe consider how any identity gets lost?

Not only from an internal perspective, but as though lost in a crowd within the broad spectrum of mutual (over all) consideration?

What happens to "Mutual Consideration" (understanding) within any household if it were possible to somehow strip it of its history?

If there were a Loss of any sort, would this type of loss also be "Measurable"?

How about if absolute "Equal" rights were given to EVERYONE in that same household 'Over Night to then apply the same question(s) concerning a "Realized Loss" in terms of "How" measurable those losses "Truly" are?

Not to mention whether or NOT those same "Losses" are deemed worthy of being "Measured"?

I don't know about you, but I personally know very few people that have the patience to sit down in one setting and watch a 3-4 hour long movie, much less those who are willing to hear someone tell a life story that didn't include the one listening.

I want to pose a two fold question, which category does today's Christianity belong and which category does the religion you personally put into "practice" also belong?

We're living in a world where "Selfies" and a hyper sensitive 'Social Media Network" have for all practical purposes heisted public opinion.

Public opinion to further suggest a sense of awareness that looks like a "Bank Vault" that has "Zero" security measures in place.

If that were accepted as true, what could prove itself to be so influential that could cause not only the individual but MANY to "Hear" what has NOT been said through the use of words?

Have you ever considered how is it possible for something wantonly to be considered to be intangible as is "Wisdom" to then hear wisdom refer to itself as "Me"? It's just a question so please DON"T try and read more into its simplicity that has been asked.....

What happens whenever some one's Else's suffering gets misinterpreted?

As if asking, "What did this person say or do to somehow then deserve being treated as harshly as they've obviously been 'Judged"?

To then consider who in their 'Right' mind would also choose to follow the likeness of the spiritual example the Apostle Paul left behind whom also stated He was following Christ?

If God were considered to be hiding ANYTHING from anyone, what would many conclude andthat based on what they assume they Know to be True about God? Lack of trust maybe?

Whenever you or I see or hear a story told where one of the 'Main" players is being portrayed as a SELFISH being, what do those story lines go on to reveal?

Doesn't what each viewer gleans from the story told more often result as though some degree of relativity each individual viewer may or may NOT have towards the one who plays the SELFISH role?

Not only do you or I as the viewing audience glean, but what does the selfish player within the telling of the story always seem to miss out on?

Very few people I personally have encountered have the patience to sit and watch a 3-4 hour long movie, much less a story told that could take a life time to share.

In terms of having "Obtained" or somehow "accquired" knowledge, when does the truthful consideration of "FROM Whom" finds its value somehow then finding itself being "Applied"?

1 Thess 1:4-5
For we know, brothers loved by God, that he has chosen you, because our gospel came to you not simply with words, but also with power , with the Holy Spirit and with deep conviction.
NIV

Prov 9:10-12
The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom , and knowledge of the Holy One is understanding

For through me your days will be many, and years will be added to your life.

If you are wise, your wisdom will reward you; if you are a mocker, you alone will suffer."
NIV

Eph 3:7-13
I became a servant of this gospel by the gift of God's grace given me through the working of his power.

Although I am less than the least of all God's peoplethis grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ, and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.

His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms, according to his eternal purpose which he accomplished in Christ Jesus our Lord.

In him and through faith in him we may approach God with freedom and confidence.

I ask you, therefore, not to be discouraged because of my sufferings for you, which are your glory.
NIV


1 Cor 2:16
For who has known the mind of the Lord that he may instruct him?"

But we have the mind of Christ .
NIV

Is the eternal truthful question, 'What have You believed"? Or is the type of question which also fits its eternal definition, "WHO have you believed"?

Jesus once asked those He directly taught (in physical form), "Who do you say that I Am"?

Whereas today as though "Indirectly' being asked of those He also teaches, is that same question still on the "Table"?

Many want to make the claim of 'Christ in them", yet what does denying "Christ" today truly appear as? Does it ONLY depend upon "Who it is that's asking"?

What single spiritual endowment that is said of God to be In Christ is also NOT accessible by those who are also IN Christ? And if NOT accessible...Why Not?

Is the divine answer only dependent upon what you ask, how you ask or WHO you ask?

What if the divine objective for ALL those who are of the house of God were this?

Who can not only hear the voice of God. yet as such 'With clarity in the midst of what ever it is each says or does while in this world?

How simple is the gift of hearing any voice that also carries within itself the sound or tone of authority?

Try not to over complicate what I'm suggesting yet consider the simplicity of words such as 'Stop or Go'? How hard is to somehow disrupt the God appointed Context and/or continuity of such easily spoken words?

Is it possible for the soul of a man to be saved without the words of God weighing in on whatever it is any man chooses to also say or do in this life?

Have you ever had a lengthy (supposed) relationship with someone only to EVENTUALLY discover you TRULY never got to "Know" (see) this particular "Person"?

And what does the spirit within ANY man look like if NOT ....God like?

Years ago when my children were also much younger and they'd discovered their father had brought their character in for questioning, I'd make it a point to inform as if a disclaimer that "Dad See's You"!

I as THEIR father in those moments also realized they probably had no "Idea" of what I was more deeply suggesting to them , never the less I still felt obligated to disclose same.....

What is about that First time whenever it becomes OBVIOUS Your Child not only HAS lied to you as a "Parent" but even worse continues in the vein of that Lie?

What parental verbiage is more often the words of choice? Don't we hear ourselves as parents saying, "Do you think that I'm stupid"?

Is the essence of that same question at the heart of what not only has 'Frustrated" many believers today but has for centuries?

And that NOT even trying to TRUTHFULLY consider doing maintenance in TRUTHFUL relationship with an "Unbeliever" whose spiritually attached (tethered) at the HIP to this world?

And what is the definition of "Insanity"?

What is about the child especially once realized the perpetrator couldn't have chosen a WORSE set of circumstances where they TRY to TEST the depth of your INTUITION as a PARENT? Much less a supposed Adult in this world?

The type of adult whose cultured mindset  that is not only dominated by but has chosen to define as the dominate voice in their lives as though "Responsible" for the present condition of the House, Spouse, Vehicles 2.5 children they SUGGEST they've SHARED their own lives with?

Is being a good parent in the sight of God only about the appearance of the "Office" of a parent? Or does being a good parental figure (icon) have more to do with what is clearly understood by everyone in that same house as though APPARENT in the sight of God?

Apparent to further suggest 'Applicable"?

And if NOT apparent and/or applicable to all involved, "WHY NOT"?

If there is something to be gleaned from the story of "Eli', what do You see as though blindingly obvious? Do you only see, "That was then and this is NOW"?

How vague or unclear today is the title (label) "Man of God'?

How startling today is the thought of the presence of God in ANY form? Whenever He (God) presents himself to ANY man who also claims to be OF The House of GOD?

Even if only in the Form of  a question asked?

1 Sam 2:27
Now a man of God came to Eli and said to him, "This is what the LORD says: 'Did I not clearly reveal myself to your father's house when they were in Egypt under Pharaoh?
NIV

1 Sam 3:11-14
And the LORD said to Samuel: "See, I am about to do something in Israel that will make the ears of everyone who hears of it tingle.

At that time I will carry out against Eli everything I spoke against his family — from beginning to end. 

For I told him that I would judge his family forever because of the sin he knew about; his sons made themselves contemptibleand he failed to restrain them.

Therefore, I swore to the house of Eli , 'The guilt of Eli's house will never be atoned for by sacrifice or offering.'" NIV

Exactly how long has the sense of knowing to do what is "Right" been made alive in the awareness of humanity/

Gen 4:6-7
Then the LORD said to Cain, "Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have youbut you must master it ."
NIV

When ANY temptation comes to ANY person, exactly how does ANY man also come into the possession of knowing the escape route?

And that while claiming to also Know beyond 'Doubt", Gods desire is that ALL men would be 'Saved'?

I've said all that to hopefully bring into focus (question) the following, "How different are those outside of our christian home lives within this SAME line of reasoning and in terms of God given "Intuition"?

Some might refer to the essence of what I'm hoping to convey more clearly as "Common Sense", yet what does this more often ASSUMED common sense also try to reveal in any God given moment?

Especially as if a 6th sense that's yet to be well established within a person?

Christianity for years have scarcely labeled this "Sense" of spiritual awareness as "Discernment", yet how many have come know at minimum divine discernment does exist, yet enough so that it (discernment) can be taught to those who have also been entrusted to the supposed parental 'Care and Oversight" of those who convinced themselves that Children are a blessing From God in one form or another?

And where does the "Wisdom" that is also from God also find its first opportunity where it an be demonstrated within any relationship?

It's one thing to suggest being possessed by the awareness of the "Fear of the Lord", yet what does it appear as (Manifest) as though it IS within ANY man or woman?

Here's a challenging question for those who tell themselves they not only know God but even greater are "Known By God".

Here it is, "Did Jesus have within him the spirited guidance of the fear the Lord"?

Some might assume "How could He" and that based on what they think they know to be True ABOUT God in that, "How could Jesus the Christ who is a part of ALL that God says He is somehow fear his own personage"?

I personally think it wise to always KNOW as much about ANY person(ality) and as such under the clear terms of reality whom I also consider to have befriended me, but shouldn't the truthful consideration be 'Who TRULY cares what I THINK" in any given moment as well WHY NOT?

This mindset might prove that I'm not only a slow learner and maybe among a numbered few, yet at the end of the days I've been given I DO know and beyond doubt who is for me and WHO it is beyond doubt.....AGAINST me!

Exactly what is the SPIRITUAL danger in somehow trying to View Jesus from a worldly point of view? Whether that same question carries the same weight it did some 2000 plus years ago it should also carry with it TODAY? As if TODAY is the DAY(s) of Our salvation?

Especially while struggling with the chaos within this corrupt world? While unfortunately at times seemingly ONLY having in my possession the type if POWERFUL words one can hang hang their spiritual "Hat" (covering) on?

Isa 11:1-3
A shoot will come up from the stump of Jesse;
from his roots a Branch will bear fruit. 

The Spirit of the LORD will rest on him —
the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding,
the Spirit of counsel and of power,
the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD  —
and he will delight in the fear of the LORD .
NIV.