In terms of the proverbial picture that's worth a thousand words, what do you see as if the essence of this video"? Just try watching it without reading the words below this line. ______________________________________________
Now apply the narrative I've supplied and ask yourself if you agree with what you assume I'm suggesting by way of that "Same" narrative?
Based on the widely accepted definition below is there a type of "Intuitive" application that can not only be observed but also accurately "Applied"? As such that's been based only upon what can be "Seen" within the fashioned video above?
Please take note there are no "Obvious" street markings or red lights that can be seen, yet is that alone enough information to interpret what you do think you see? Also take note of the otherwise tiny dots that are pedestrians who are also crossing the intersection in different picture frames?
Now ask yourself, what is about this video you would personally NEED to see differently in order to accurately assess what you think you DO see in motion?
Enough that is to where this supplied imagery could find its legitimacy if it were tasked with "Proving" a specific point?
A Proven point "Made" as though something more than an "opinion" COULD be offered?
The type of opinion that's based NOT only on what CAN BE SEEN but also by way of what may NOT be seen at the speed in which it's being presented?
How different are our lives? Are they only individual images seen or are the lives we live out a series of pictures set in motion?
And that without the ability to play what has been seemingly captured at ANY chosen speed, namely "Fast Forwarded"? And much less being seen for what it is when played in "Reverse"?
The totality of life is often referred to as the "Bigger Picture" when trying to prove a more finite point, yet what is more often heard when a particular picture frame has seemingly been dissected from a bigger picture that's also otherwise constantly in Motion?
How many individual images have need of being "Seen" before the one observing those same images begins to grasp the commonality that can also be observed once those many individual images have been set in motion?
Why the more recent hype and/or focus upon 'Selfies"? Why the historical focus placed upon seeing self within a group picture taken of "Many"?
In term of timing and the divine order of ALL things that also apply to ALL mankind, "Why" is it the narrative (biography) of some of the most important people in history do NOT also have a personal picture that can also be associated?
Truly what has the "Imag-ination of mere men been formed from?
How powerful has the image become in light of a seemingly slow fade away from the need for the Truthful narrative?
In terms of a perceived Intuition" do pictures speak a thousand words? To then place the double burden on that response with, "Do pictures also speak a thousand "Truthful" words when taking the supplied narrative into 'Account"?
And exactly why do men suggest their own eyes can play tricks on them?
Eyes that can play tricks while in possession of ears that can and do taste words?
Job 12:11
Does not the ear test words as the tongue tastes food?
NIV
What part of a man also processes all of his said "Intel"? The same type of "Intel" he's historically relied upon having come by way of his natural 5 senses which then further promotes the same type of "Intelligence" many refer to as 'Wisdom"?
Wisdom from where though, 'Above or below"?
Rom 8:16-17
The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God's children. Now if we are children, then we are heirs — heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory.
NIV
All the above having experienced the similar suggestion where a passing scent is capable of interfering with the sense of ones taste or making them momentarily nauseous or ill minded should that same scent finds itself serving at the whim of a simultaneously conjured "Bad Memory"?
Are the 5 senses of the body also a part of the same body the Apostle Paul suggest he had to metaphorically beat into submission? Or did Paul have to retrain his mindset so that those same God given senses could then be found serving the spirit of The Lord?
And what does the divine renewal of the mind "Entail"?
All the above said, How does a man find himself "Believing" what has only been spoken of" by an otherwise invisible presence? To then try and truthfully make sense of a God that says of His person that He IS SPIRIT?
The same type of spirit the flesh in and of itself is NOT capable of Inheriting? And if NOT the flesh what part of a man is left to inherit ANYTHING God who is spirit has also supplied?
And that while considering the "Power" of any mans testimony that has ONLY to do with ALL that is True?
Does a picture alone also provide sufficient context in order to explain why only certain things may or may NOT be seen for all that they ARE in the sight of God?
3 John 8
We ought therefore to show hospitality to such men so that we may work together for the truth .
NIV
2 Cor 13:7-9
7 Now we pray to God that you will not do anything wrong. Not that people will see that we have stood the test but that you will do what is right even though we may seem to have failed. For we cannot do anything against the truth, but only for the truth .
We are glad whenever we are weak but you are strong; and our prayer is for your perfection.
NIV
How many have heard of and seen the Kingdom of God, yet only as though from afar? And how many have been allowed to enter that kingdom based on all they've chosen to believe to BE TRUE about that same kingdom?
What type of man is it who can claim to know more about the Kingdom that is ONLY in heaven who seems to know even less about the territory and rightful property here on earth that also belongs to that same kingdom in heaven?
The same kingdom Christ has made known that is within those who HAVE believed?
And what does being away from the Lord in BODY suggest? On vacation? Away on "Sabbatical"?
And what is it about this world that could somehow spiritually chain his soul to the likeliness of the images that belong to this World?
Those same images THIS world has provided? The narratives about those same images that have been "Re-worded" and then "Altered"?
in·tu·i·tion
ˌint(y)o͞oˈiSH(ə)n/
noun
- the ability to understand something immediately, without the need for conscious reasoning.
"we shall allow our intuition to guide us"
No comments:
Post a Comment