Search This Blog

Thursday, June 27, 2019

Exactly WHO is it that is "Out" to prove You Wrong


Isa 55:10-13
As the rain and the snow come down from heaven, and do not return to it without watering the earth and making it bud and flourish, so that it yields seed for the sower and BREAD for the eater, so is my word that goes out from my mouth:


It will not return to me emptybut will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it. 

You will go out in joy and be led forth in peace; the mountains and hills
will burst into song before you, and all the trees of the field will clap their hands.

Instead of the thorn bush will grow the pine tree,and instead of briers the myrtle will grow.
This will be for the LORD's renown, for an everlasting sign, which will not be destroyed."
NIV

At what point do the words of God prove anything specific in this world to a person "Today"?

I've heard many people suggest the words of God need to be "Updated" to modern times to suit the "Needs" of people, yet what does that Mean? That being asked without somehow being dragged into the murky depths of a discussion revolving around "Post Modernism". 

To whom are the words of God intended to "Speak to" as if a "Targeted Audience"? To suggest "Your One Only" source for answers for everyday questions? As if talking about a moral compass that hopes to guide the hearer as if the "Intended" recipient? 

When someone suggest you've been "Owned" by way something that's been said, truly what is a person suggesting when they do say, "I Owned You"?

The buzz words of late "The Narrative" seems to keep resurfacing nearly everywhere I turn whether talking about the News Media Talking Heads or whomever the proverbial "They" seem to have no problem "Quoting" as if the Gospel. Words spoken also without the "Fear" of being accused of "Plagiarism".

pla·gia·rism
/ˈplājəˌrizəm/
noun
  1. the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own.
    "there were accusations of plagiarism"

That said, at what point does it truly matter WHO said WHAT in this world? That being asked as if observing the responses towards whatever's been "Said" as though words "Spoken with Authority"?
 
As if observing those who have "Realized" the importance of taking their valuable time in order to Listen? Listening not to suggest the hearing of a 'Passing Train" in the distance that's quickly ignored, but having "Heard" a message and in turn responding in a "Specific Fashion"?

The type of hearing/listening spirit within a person who not only "Sees"as the result of what's been said, but also one who seizes each and every moment having found their whole spirit body and soul to be in agreement with the one and only "True Author of Life"? 

Having heard a message for ALL that it was intended to accomplish? A specific type of message which then speaks on behalf of the deep reason why anyone might choose to reflect on matters of GREATER importance?

What exactly might prove to be the underlying "Cause" of anyone's "Actions" who also tries to suggest WHY they do NOT know the truth about "Anything" the words of God have clearly articulated? Many are searching for their their own "Covering" as if a shelter or Father, yet who's NOT taking seriously and/or making use of this same type of shelter (covering)?

Is there a "True" reason" as to "Why" God can wisely suggest that ANYTHING that does "Not" stem from "Faith" in the manifold wisdom of God by way of the leading of the Holy Spirit, should be considered as though a sinful "Act"? Actions that have followed the voice of "Another"? Having followed the leading of a spirit through a portal that opens for reason that are beyond the realm of "Doubt and Unbelief"? More than probable truly NOT in agreement as though of  "Godly Origin"?

At what point does a soul "Truly" examine itself? A soul truly lead of God who then speaks from a purview as to how "Holy" God truly is? What should any soul also conclude when it's been prefaced, "I believed therefore I speak"? Is this declaration only to suggest that God merely "Exist" and as such without "Reason"/

And who can otherwise "Truly" defend the "Mind of Christ" through the "Use" of mere words? Having spoken as if in His "Stead" as though an "Ambassador" and without the intercession of His "Holy Spirit"? 

The Holy Spirit whom also brings all things Christ has clearly presented unto your remembrance in a (timely) God given moment? The type of presentation "Made" when you (Only Later) discover that your tongue tongue has either set the "World" around "You" on fire OR spiritually "Proves" you have been "Approved" and that of "God'? In so much you not only do so "Clearly" but also know beyond doubt you've also acted outwardly "Obediently"? 

Namely having spoken as if under the authority of "The Christ" you also claim is "In You" (you're possessed by)? It's one consideration to claim being possessed, yet at what stage does a person lay "Claim" to being possessed by a "Demon" or by the "Holy Spirit of God"/

When a man "Knows" beyond doubt that ONLY God can make things that are also "Good" grow (Increase) where then should anyones confidence be considered to have "Come From" in terms of "Origin"? Especially under the honest consideration that may or may not proclaim that ONLY God is GOOD in "All" things?

Without failing to mention that if God did NOT clearly articulate His mutual calling as if the sound of His voice, who then do the "Net" results of same reflect upon or "Not"? At what point does, "My Sheep hear my voice" depict a clear "Note" sounded?

Just think, if someone must "First" prove to you or I beyond our OWN doubt and "Unbelief" "Why, When and Where and to whomever God does choose to speak "Through them", who then is able to "Righteously" explain "Why" the "Intended Recipient" (hearer) failed to respond "Accordingly"? Having realized their God Given spirit is also in "Agreement' with what's been presented as if "The Truth"? 

There is a True reason as to why many throughout history "Insist" upon the existence of "Free Will", yet these same ones also choose to CONTINUE to resist the leading of the Holy Spirit. It's been declared through Christ concerning a certain type of "Freedom" only He can give, BUT much has also been said from that same mouth (Namely Christ) about WHY those who are free should NOT abuse this same FREEDOM he also Freely gives to those who do Believe that He was sent of God.

When "All" is proved to have been "Said and Done" God requires, will it also prove to be a simple consideration where "only" the preacher(s) are at "Fault"? At fault and the REASON for everything that somehow failed to take up residency here in the earth that is also said to be "Gods" footstool?

Matt 22:29
Jesus replied, "You are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God.
NIV

Where exactly is the Power of God going to be found if NOT found in the Promises He's already MADE? How many will in another day truly be ashamed of ALL they've refused to have BEEN true all along only later to find OUT exactly why "All" mankind have fallen short of the Glory of God at some POINT --->? 

What exactly do the words of God POINT towards? Failure alone? Or do the words of God truly point to ALL things that are possible yet ONLY when found to BE in Agreement with the words that came from "The Lord of ALL"? Is there truly MORE than ONE reason why everyone does NOT respond to the calling of one and only  "One True God?

Rom 1:16-17
I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. For in the gospel a righteousness from God is revealed, a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written: "The righteous will live by faith."   
NIV

How many readers have actually taken the time to consider why the entire book of "Acts" was titled as such? The Holy spirit as if always searching for those in agreement spoke the following through the personage of Christ during His visitation to mankind.

John 10:34-39
Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are gods'? If he called them 'gods,' to whom the word of God came and the Scripture cannot be broken— what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, 'I am God's Son'? 

Do not believe me unless I do what my Father does. But if I do it, even though you do not believe me, believe the miracles , that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father."

Again they tried to seize him, but he escaped their grasp.
NIV

How many today suggest they've confessed (Professed) they BELIEVE IN GOD, yet how many of those same ones have also professed "Jesus is Lord" of ALL?

How many of those same ones are NOT able to prove their Father who is also their GOD they "Say"they've also "Believed" with ALL their heart, .mind, soul and (combined) strength? Said also to reside within their "Personage" here in this world? And how many of those same ones are NOT believed when they in turn attempt to testify on behalf of their God and Father's? Truly what is the REALIZED capacity and authority of an "Ambassador" who does come in the "Name of the Lord'?

And in turn if those sent are NOT believed, who "Exactly" is it that hasn't also honestly inquired "Why Not"? Who exactly is "Justifying" who in this world in terms of true "Authority and/or their "Actions" as if in  response to what has been spoken to them from the mouth of God? To the "Point" of hearing with their spiritual "Ears" so that the eyes of thier God given spirit can "See" clearly?

And how many of those who confess believing in a God truly are that same Gods Ambassador(s) and/or servants who HAVE been SENT by way of His True Authority? The evidence of being 'Sent" only due to the fact those same ones are also following the LIVING example of the Christ the One True God sent as His ONLY begotten Son?

As if to suggest by "Whose" authority has anyone been sent in ORDER to accurately deliver the essence (spirit) of His (Gods) original "Message"? And If the message many suggest they are sending was God sent, why then are those SAME words being 'Delivered" NOT accomplishing what they were sent "Of God" to accomplish? At what point does the full circle of "Projection and Rejection" come into focus?

Is the spirit of God talking TO or THROUGH the Prophet He's also sent? Or is his spirit speaking about what He has given not only to His prophets, but also dispenses to ALL those personages who are in this World? The same Ones to whom His word has been sent? What happens whenever ANY prophet is GIVEN greater importance as if ABOVE and Beyond the full intentions of the "Message"sent?

What exactly rises to ANY occasion or comes to the Forefront when the spokes person (messenger) becomes the focal POINT? Why exactly does it "Seem" to matter more to some whether or NOT it was an Angel who brings the words (Message) of God OR that His words were presented through a man, woman or a donkey? What does it mean when a herald says, "He came to His OWN, but His own did NOT receive Him"?

To then truthfully reconsider that in this type of sequence it is the "Recipient" who ultimately determines WHO the Source (Origins) of those same spoken came from? Should Christ Come to anyone, who exactly is it that gets to determine or NOT the underlying source/origin of a message sent? Why are some so easily convinced a random message found afloat in a bottle was intended for them verses a live person that declares they were "Sent of God"?

Isa 55:10-13
As the rain and the snow come down from heaven, and do not return to it without watering the earth and making it bud and flourish, so that it yields seed for the sower and BREAD for the eater, so is my word that goes out from my mouth:


It will not return to me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it. 

You will go out in joy and be led forth in peace; the mountains and hills
will burst into song before you, and all the trees of the field will clap their hands.

Instead of the thorn bush will grow the pine tree, and instead of briers the myrtle will grow.
This will be for the LORD's renown, for an everlasting sign, which will not be destroyed."
NIV


No comments:

Post a Comment