Can a man dwell upon a matter before being prompted by what he's seen or heard of it?
How powerful is the desire "To Know"?
Is it as simple and harmless as the word "Curiosity" suggest or is it something more alluring much like a whole in a rain storm where water rushes in?
Why would someone suggest that "My curiosity got the best of me"? What is the best of you?
What of the statement, "You draw out the best in me"? Who has bestowed the best in YOU?
Where would humanity be without children that we can study in order to learn more about ourselves while observing them?
How important does pro-creation then become trailing on the heels of that consideration?
What comes to mind if one were to say, "Eye candy" or maybe "You've tickled my fancy"?
Why are some questions less important to others as compared to how they impact you?
What would you consider to be a lifeless thought?
What if speaking ones mind were considered a life giving action by way of breathing life into a suggestive thought?
What if everything that finds itself as an existence were the result of a question that's been asked?
How does one prove they truly believe anything they're told?
How does one prove what they've been told is also True?
How is one proved to be a liar?
Don't they have to be caught in a lie and would that not also suggest that a lie is a trap?
Is the trap of a lie not simply further entanglement of words?
Isn't staying focused really just not forgetting what you were just thinking about?
Aren't most familiar arguments the net result of not remembering the same thing the same way?
When "Dwelling" on a matter how deep did you have to dig before you grow fatigued?
If you take your mind off something where does what you were thinking about "Go"?
Why isn't being "Absent minded" considered the same as having an "Out of Body Experience"?
Why is "Critical thinking" emphasized as being "Critical" when you've devoted your thinking towards another person and their behavior?
Why isn't critique easily accepted? Who qualifies the critique enough that they are heard?
Is the arguable question, "Are you as equally critical of yourself"?
When does the good outweigh the bad whether thinking about yourself or others?
When you consider the Pro's and Con's of a situation when does the one considering become the "Con-artist" that's painting the picture?
Why is it when someone wants to make themselves bigger in their world they have to accuse or see the other person as if living in their own "Little" world?
If it's hard to find someone that's right what are the odds of finding out that you're wrong?
Does simply making the law fix any problem or does upholding the law understand the reason as if the need for it?
If there's no room for an excuse what does that leave room for?
If striving for perfection were thought of as futile, where does that leave the thought for that which is considered perfect?
If being "Crazy" were defined as "Losing control over the mind of one's own thoughts" then why haven't over powering desires and emotions been outlawed?
Does anger have and serve a purpose or is it more to do with the whom that particular anger doesn't serve?
If something is "Eating at you" then what is holding you back from feeding it?
What is frustration, is it simply the inability or failure to recognize the nature of what your emotion filled desires want or is it the indecisive nature of your logic towards what is considered as righteous in Gods sight?
Do you use the imperfect history of the messenger that might have been sent to you against them in order to defend (justify) your own actions done today?
One who has come to you in response to repentance in an attempt to help You see what you're doing?
Will the nature of such a defense suffice having been presented as if another's similar behavior on the day when You alone are standing before the One that will judge all men?
How does the mind of a blind man operate once made able to see? Does he keep it to himself or does he try to tell others what he now can see as if the reward of the One that made him whole again?
Believing something said as if the truth is not only about "What" you've believed, instead it's because of "Whom" you've believed that will in turn establish the "Why" you have believed as if the "Truth".
The message presented by the ambassador that's been sent on behalf of the King will prove to have little strength (ability to influence) if the ambassador's King is not honored.
Matt 10:41-42
Anyone who receives a prophet because he is a prophet will receive a prophet's reward, and anyone who receives a righteous man because he is a righteous man will receive a righteous man's reward. And if anyone gives even a cup of cold water to one of these little ones because he is my disciple, I tell you the truth, he will certainly not lose his reward."
NIV
Man does not establish the truth, he can only acknowledge all that the "Truth" is, does and is forever capable of as if the person of God. Only then can your own heart be established as if the corrupt concerns which are of this world that have since been put to rest.
Where does the difference of a heart that is now the repentant heart come into play as if the evidence of what you have believed?
Rom 8:6-8
The mind of sinful man is death, but the mind controlled by the Spirit is life and peace; the sinful mind is hostile to God. It does not submit to God's law, nor can it do so. Those controlled by the sinful nature cannot please God.
NIV
How much is "Enough"? Is it a pound of flesh or a year of equal hurt?
Does the mind of the soul, the body or spirit decide when enough is enough?
Does the body have a mind as if a voice of its own and does that voice sit within a panel of three (spirit, soul and body) where there is no such thing as a tie "Vote" that's cast?
Who decides when the body will eat and how long will mere thoughts of food satisfy its hunger?
If one is constantly having to fight for their individual rights, will they ever experience freedom that is true?
What is the difference between your assumed "Rights" and your "Freedom which are then realized?
Who is it that establishes AND upholds your understood Right(s)? Your fellow man or the one which makes the "Law"?
Do laws oppose freedom or simply keep what freedom has assumed under control?
Is the animal considered "Wild" because of its environment or because of its nature that doesn't want to be under control while chasing freedom?
What is a perfect world, a place where there are no problems or a place where everybody is equally invested while looking for the right answers?
If you're looking for the truth, have you found it only when "You're" comfortable?
Is fools "Gold" the symbol of an empty bank account or assuming he's in possession of it while going in debt all over town?
If the body is destined for the grave, where does that leave the existence of your spirit and soul?
If cold were best defined as the absence of heat, darkness as the absence of light and death as the absence of life, how can one consider "Eternal Life"?
Is deception the simple matter of how YOU see and interpret the truth or is it that reality is not within your control which defines everything you may or may not be able to see?
Does discovering the truth require the unfolding of circumstance(s) before you know and then understand or is there a more accurate place where truth and deception face off in the cross hairs of your line of sight?
What if truth were defined as the absence of deception and that deception as such which labors to prevent you from hearing and then seeing what is True?
What is the difference between law that is written and the law of the spirit?
Can man discover the results of his own logic unless he's chosen to sit and reason with the God?
In an attempt to make use of his own logic, what has a man really learned once he reaches the end of his life given him and how long is his list of reasons for all that he's done?
Is it all really a matter of who you are as much as it is to whom do you belong?
Isa 1:18
"Come now, let us reason together ," says the LORD.
NIV
Rom 8:5-9
Those who live according to the sinful nature have their minds set on what that nature desires; but those who live in accordance with the Spirit have their minds set on what the Spirit desires. The mind of sinful man is death, but the mind controlled by the Spirit is life and peace; the sinful mind is hostile to God. It does not submit to God's law, nor can it do so. Those controlled by the sinful nature cannot please God.
You, however, are controlled not by the sinful nature but by the Spirit, if the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Christ.
NIV
No comments:
Post a Comment