Great and small gender aside

Deut 25:13-16
Do not have two differing weights in your bag — one heavy, one light. Do not have two differing measures in your house — one large, one small. You must have accurate and honest weights and measures, so that you may live long in the land the LORD your God is giving you. For the LORD your God detests anyone who does these things, anyone who deals dishonestly. NIV

Who gets to decide how many justifiable ways there are to deny Christ. sw

Valuing life here and now, is it the same type of value placed on death that exceeds the type of death the appointed One has already endured. sw

Exactly how many different righteous ways are there to investigate a matter. sw

If it has been said those who deceive parade around as angels of light, why are so many reviewing those who delight in darkness. sw

We live in a world where "Proportion" plays a significant role not only in terms of measurement, but in other ways where the realm of rationale invites us to consider "Severity" (quantity vs quality).

In the United States we have "Misdemeanor" and "Felony" crimes. The status of either being predetermined by terms of punishment should someone be found guilty.

Acts 17:31
For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. NIV

All that's needed outside of the already established system in terms of "Findings" is the "Sufficient" evidence, that will support those findings. Those findings and for all practical purposes that already stand opposed to those accused which are then Re-viewed by a competent jury who ultimately decide's guilt or innocence.

1 Cor 6:2
Do you not know that the saints will judge the world ? And if you are to judge the world , are you not competent to judge trivial cases? NIV

In the lite of how Paul presents the context (framework) of his message above, would it be fair to ask is there such a thing as (misdemeanor) Trivial "Sin"?

And if ALL "Sin" were observed as the direct result of "Ignorance and Unbelief" who then could be found guilty having claimed they have "Believed"? And that with ALL of their heart, mind, soul and strength?

Jesus did NOT say man shall live by SOME of the words from the mouth of God but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.

Is it too large of a gap and too much of a stretch to suggest that nothing God has said in one instance will NEVER oppose what He has also said somewhere else? To then find ourselves standing by faith when or if Gods word is ever presented as if in competition  (contest) with itself?

Could that be why it is said that In Christ it is ALWAYS "Yes" and the "Amen" is heard?

1 Cor 6:3-4
Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, appoint as judges even men of little account in the church!
NIV

Take note that even in the earth when a jury is seated not all of those pooled will ultimately qualify for "Duty" for one reason or another. One must also ask when weighing only a sampling of humanity, does this type of earth bound jury selection somehow meet with a "Divine" standard of Jurisprudence?

Especially when one honestly weighs two thoughts that somehow seem to wage war against each other?

Is it possible both can be true at the same time? Why do many seem to have to do away with one opinion before the other can be accepted as True and Applicable today?

Either there is a "Hell" that represents the Godly affects of an acceptable type of Fear or there is "NO Hell", which more often results in a vision where "No One" is seen going to hell therefore No One "Fears" God?

So which is it? Cast the first stone or judge yourself so that you will NOT be found guilty? Exactly who is the type of man who always wants to be found guilty of the charge?

Did no one throw a stone that day because they all knew in their hearts they'd committed adultery OR because they ALL understood the equality (status) of sin?

John 8:7
If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her."
NIV

So what do we do, give everyone a free pass when they've been caught in sin? And that because it has become a well known fact because so many have taught so well that ALL men carry in them the guilt of the sinful nature?

Isa 5:20

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil , who put darkness for light and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter. NIV

Once the evidence has been "Re-presented" to the jury they will be given the opportunity to vicariously view (Consider) the likeness of the same scenario that's been "Recreated"?

I say all this not as if to "Try" the totality of Gods likeness, but to expose the potential which humanity Re-presents to itself as if a trickle down affect. As such that looks to circumvent the ONLY one who is justified in ALL He says and does.

When the thought remains supreme that some are actually going to hell for the remainder of eternity, at what point has/does the thought "Who demanded such Justice" come into focus?

If the "Disciples" of Christ TRULY are our teachers today as we also suggest that we're "Believers" in Christ, what did Peter DO when some were not only found out to be lying to the Holy Spirit, but when given a second chance they chose once more to continue to Lie to God?

I think it to be a good entry level question, Does God measure mankind with the same measuring instrument men do?

Another might be, if little to nothing that takes place in this world does NOT translates in the decision making process (Judgement) of God as well find its shadow in eternity, why go through the whole thing?

Is it all for mere amusement and if so whose amusement?

In this particular blog I hope to "Cross Examine" the integrity of the self perpetuating notion(s) most seem to latch onto. For those not familiar with the term "Latch on", the imagery is that of a suckling infant feeding on the breast.

I'm not as focused on isolating a specific use of words, but what it is that's being "Realized" by the hearer of anything said.

It's a sweet spot within the realm of "Effectual" communication when two or more find themselves able to convey precise images through the use of words.

I enjoy the words "Effectual" and "Compacted" used in the KJV to express such a point. The image here in my thinking is one that agree's with when God actually "Formed" from something so lowly as dirt and in terms of carefully being "Compacted" before leaning over and breathing life into this formed being.

Somehow one can see hands reaching out to shape and form every aspect of this creature which not only began with the humbled beginnings of dirt to be tread upon, but also later to be used a a living example of something God says will also prove to be far superior in another day.

Eph 4:16
From whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love. KJV

Does it become clearer how the same creator could later suggest to the man that "Loves" himself will also Learn to (edify itself) Love His wife? To what end though?

Especially when considering exactly were it was the materials used to make woman also came from within "Man" (Adam)?

Eph 5:28-30
He who loves his wife loves himself .

After all, no one ever hated his own body, but he feeds and cares for it, just as Christ does the church— 30 for we are members of his body.
NIV

Eph 5:32-33
This is a profound mystery — but I am talking about Christ and the church.

However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself , and the wife must respect her husband. NIV

In terms of what God is building, what God says is possible when a woman tears down her own house with her own hands, how does that speak to so many other consideration that might oppose the performance of God and the outcome of much more?

How many are asking themselves tough questions while demanding of themselves a righteous response about the true nature and Mercy of God?

Instead of asking "What if Adam refused to ALSO eat of the fruit offered to him by Eve"?

Why not ask about what the Mercy of God looked like in that moment now that we know today the lamb was slain "Before" the earth and everything in it was formed?

In terms of interaction with God and because He is God, whose to question ANY conditions he sets before ANY man in ANY season of time? The same type which agree's with What? What God has also said in another place or time or season of humanity?

In terms of timing OR ANYTHING God has said within the scope of time, is God ever late? Is He ALWAYS on time? Does He as God ever get ahead of himself?

In terms of an Acceptable "Excuse", what would one sound like in the "Ears of God"? And when hearing the word excuse, the 'Excuse for "What"?

And what is "Justification" in the sight of God if NOT an attempt at the Displacement/Replacement of "Righteousness"?

Rom 1:20
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse . NIV

Is there such a thing as a time barrier between you and ANYONE over the course of time whenever a man attempts to compare and/or somehow distance himself from someone else?

Rom 2:1-2

You, therefore, have no excuse , you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things. Now we know that God's judgment against those who do such things is based on truth.
NIV

In terms of that same mercy, "What if Sapphira the wife of Ananias refused to agree with her husband when Peter ALSO inquired of her (separately) about the money (realized profit) from the sale of property?

Why isn't it being asked of both scenario's and in terms of the Mercy Of God believers who suggest they also depend upon, "Where was their individual spiritual "discernment" in the moment? The type of discernment that would have served them differently in terms of outcome if they were to have righteously applied it?

Have you ever asked yourself "Why do so many seem to rush to the aid of their own gender" when they read these stories? Stories God says have been recorded for our our warning and examples? Why do so many approach these stories if it's NOT possible for an individual to judge a matter without getting bogged down with gender specific's?

How does all the above then fold into the dough when we then go on to study and believe, There's neither Jew Nor Greek, slave nor free or the difference of Male and Female the in the place we as believers suggest we're ALL going to? To only then force ourselves to try and remember God is NOT the respecter of the person?

Could it be that what God does show respect for is the spiritual mind those who do believe also choose to tap into?

God says of the blind and ignorant if they had known they would NOT have crucified whom?

So in the absence of the mind of Christ, what brilliance does that leave man with? The Wisdom of God he (man) then taps into if NOT the mind of Christ? Does the seemliness of any excuse of anyone NOT knowing then fall to the blame of God?

Even in the natural what does the plea look and sound like that also truly represents the identity of one that does NOT know? Wouldn't it first have to be established what a child is before the appropriate punishment is dispensed?

Why do so many continue to plead the case of the said "Child" despite what God says has been made known about Him? This child also being defined as one who TRULY does NOT know"? And if the part of an Identity does require "being known" who then has truly considered their own claim made?

Is there such thing as a spiritual "Paternity" Test? As if spiritually describing the fertility of not only the seed, but also the soil in which this same seed has been "Planted"?

Luke 8:13-14
They believe for a while, but in the time of testing they fall away.
NIV

Why would any TRUE child also continue to take a "Stand" outside of the camp or Righteousness"  of God while also blaming Him for their Hunger and thirst that could otherwise be satisfied within the camp of God?

I too would have also assumed same until I continued to plow even further into the continuation of Gods words...something that goes against the grain of those who choose to plead ignorance....

Under the prelude, "I Am my fathers son", "I can ONLY do what I SEE the Father doing", I only speak what the Father is saying, how can one then blame God for their blindness? Especially while knowing that God says to those who are in Christ Only the YES and the Amen are heard?

If everything In this world also agree's with everything "God Is Saying" at any given moment, how then can anyone be found guilty of sin? In terms of moving the property pins which mark out the boundaries of the kingdom of God, why is the a picture painted of a camp that has no laws on the inside yet immediately outside those walls, the "Law" comes into effect?

And before you answer that question as if to reassure the heart of all that you believe to be true, examine the following more closely and discover the "Context" of God as though He is not only the author of creation, but also the one who framed the worlds ONLY He can explain and even smaller matters very precisely..

Rom 1:16
I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile.
NIV

Rom 1:18-19
The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.
NIV

John 15:20-23
Remember the words I spoke to you: 'No servant is greater than his master.' If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also. They will treat you this way because of my name, for they do not know the One who sent me. If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not be guilty of sin. Now, however, they have no excuse for their sin. He who hates me hates my Father as well.

John 15:24-25
If I had not done among them what no one else did, they would not be guilty of sin. But now they have seen these miracles, and yet they have hated both me and my Father. But this is to fulfill what is written in their Law:

 'They hated me without reason.'
NIV

It's one thing to remain confident in the throws of all you ONCE claimed you did NOT know, yet to NOW suggest you DO Know, what does that then suggest about the power of Forgiveness?

On a quest that also depends on the hopes of increasingly discovering more exactly just how "Holy" God truly is. at what point does a living sacrifice consider itself to have also died to self?

Will our own salvation only prove to be when the last comparative is standing?

The same association and comparative standard presently being acquitted (mankind) we also go to great lengths in order to RE-prove our own "Imperfection" as if in our own defense?

Jesus says those who love MUCH have also been forgiven of MUCH...yet what does the look like when read in the reverse order? Those who have been forgiven of LITTLE will also love.....?

And that while telling ourselves we've believed God and are making every effort to live as if by way of every word that has proceeded from the mouth of God?

And if that doesn't prove to be worthy enough, we also tell ourselves that "While in this world we are being made LIKE Him? Really?

Remade and that by way of whose Grace (power)? That further to suggest that God is satisfied with the self governance of individual progress made is also to suggest that Your pace is what? Also satisfactory to God?

Is it any wonder why One God, One Christ and One Spirit seem to take on so many DIFFERENT personages here in the earth? Christians are not called to be like each other, no instead we're ALL called to be "Holy As I am Holy" thus saith the Lord.......

Christians are called to be LIKE minded (of One mind) yet with many different perspective on ONE and the same PURPOSE, which also suggest 'WHAT" if not the Will of God?

So unless YOU and I are that great "I AM" is it still any true wonder what it is God will be judging?

What if ones vision of self never spiritually never matures while here on earth? And the reason being because they've managed that same process as if FOR themselves?

If not remade, how then can you truthfully testify and on whose behalf as it otherwise weighs in on the truthful consideration of a "New Creation""?

He who is the utmost representative of the true Godly (God Like) "Spiritual" consideration?

Was Sapphira's death about the money OR about her having lied to God? Lied to God about what though? Does context truly matter as it concerns what she lied about or does the truth have EVERYTHING to do with a heart that prepared itself to somehow Lie to God and that in advance?

How does hatred teach anyone to loathe themselves? Especially when considering the source from which everything came and as such in a very specific "Order"?

The personage that despises themselves has truly been taught how to despise "Whom" else?

Prov 14:1-2
The wise woman builds her house, but with her own hands the foolish one tears hers down.

He whose walk is upright fears the LORD, but he whose ways are devious despises him. NIV

Philem 6
That the communication of thy faith may become effectual by the acknowledging of every good thing which is in you ..............in Christ Jesus.
KJV

Yet what has those who confess Christ as Lord believed to be to be True? True to interpret as everything we've assumed to be encased in Christ that is in us who are also IN HIM?

I read No lie was found In Him? Was that only back then or will it still be "Applicable" on another day many refer to as Judgement?

As such that is True ONLY because of all they've found they also suggest they "Believe" within ALL that they ARE? And as such despite what time, change and social evolution within that "Time" tries to present diffferently?

In terms of "All" that a person believes to be "True" how often do we as part of what was also created forget to acknowledge everything God also considers to be Good?

More often (and due to our own comfort) the social mindset that governs the thought life within a social setting tends to only consider what is "Displeasing" to God.

It is written where God said "It is Good" having finalized certain things (created) in the beginning. When we're paying attention, God also speaks of certain circumstances within which (context) certain things He created were "Placed" He also speaks of those circumstances "It is NOT Good".

One specific set of circumstances was that which relates to Man finding himself "Alone".

What many fail to examine are the type of thoughts and depth of the understanding the Holy Spirit lends itself to in the conveyance of what gets said. 

Why is so important to not only hear what's been said but also just as important to pay close attention to the actions that follow? As if to not only to accompany what gets said but also as if proving what gets said?

Exactly how well has mankind understood this "Concept"?

In terms of Loving himself, why didn't God give Adam someone just like him?

Not only for the sake biology involved but as something even greater, why did God take from Adam ANY component of his being and make Him a mate?

Whether made from the rib or from his foot, is that the essence of the point when the value of the meaningful source gets lost over time?

Why is the order of operation(s) so important? Whether talking about a math formula or process of building a house, certain considerations must come first BEFORE the next can even be considered, correct?

In terms of the god given comparison, how simple is "Just as God is the Head of Christ" or Christ is the head of every man? Just as equal how simple is "Man is the Glory of God" and "Woman is the Glory of Man"?

Who is willing to oppose how God compliments this same imagery of headship? Why did Christ NOT choose even as few as one woman to be One of His twelve Apostle's?

What is it about "Gender" today that allows the spiritual order of things God created to get bogged down in this type of gender specific logic?

Instead of defaulting to the weak "Chicken and the egg" mantra in terms of which came first, why not stay with the origin(s) of what God has established (built) and that for the sake of the "Gods otherwise Not so obvious wisdom" that seems to so easily get abandoned?

In terms of building and the reverse order of sound building practices exactly how do people ever so slowly abandon God? People will make the observation about taking God out of the schools or out of government yet they'll ignore the order of godly operation in their own homes?

From which many homes (families) or nations historically speaking never manage to recover from this type of spiritual usurping once order is lost? Exactly how does a house and/or kingdom become divided against itself?

In terms of the order of operations why didn't God simply roll out some more clay as was used to make Adam (like a cookie dough) and carve out this being Adam himself was given the liberty to name "Woman"?

Do you think that Adam at any time forgot where woman came from? How about today when a man looks at his wife? Does it ever cross his mind that when he (man) shows his wife mercy, he's also loving himself at the same time?

Do you think that woman today (more specifically Christian woman) even remotely relate back to this Truth as they look to link all their thoughts together in terms of the net results of what they "Believe" as well the importance as to why they do?

Has this type of reflection lost it's rightful place in terms of the effectual communication  of ones faith In God?

Why is that what most Christians consider to be "Good Works" more often take place outside the home?

Why can't  it begn to register the essence of everything that gets said and done in this world as compared to all that is "Presently" known to be true in Heaven (eternally) does presently also affect what happens next?

Why is the term "Known (or believed) to be True" so important?

The realm where phrases such as the "Lessor of two Evils", personal Faith or maybe "Do what you're going to do and Let God sort out the rest" are being tabled as meaningful words and phrases put into practice in the not so obvious mutual realm of "Consideration".

Considerations that will and do impact not only the future but the person(s) through whom their said "Participation" takes place?

That place of consideration that's otherwise invisible where the soul of man vicariously visits in order to weigh not only his own thoughts but also the thoughts and opinions of others that have been managed well enough to find even a temporary home there.

Some might even agree with the Holy spirit and refer to this place as the "Heart" and others the "Conscience" where the soul of the person then picks and chooses what may or may NOT matter and/or remain there.

What portion of a man is it that somehow connects to and/or associates with everything that has been stored in his own heart?

Who's contributed to the content of any mans heart?

That to mean ALL that's been deemed worthy of keeping stored there and for whatever those reason(s) "Eventually" prove to be or Not?

One of the first "Matters" a true believer in Christ must face is, "Does Jesus talk only to hear himself Talk? If "No", who then ARE the recordings of Jesus words speaking to and why?

Was He only conveying what was on His mind to a few chosen individuals (Apostle's and their close associates) who are now physically dead?

How does any "Thought" become "Self" perpetuating? As such that lives on no matter "Who" it is that speaking those same words having been judged by the individual to be "True"?

Why do men hold funerals and for whom? Those who are dead of course, but what part of their 3 part being (spirit, soul, body) has truthfully died and is seen fit to bury?

You more often hear people suggesting to their dying"Loved Ones", "I'll always have, hold and KEEP you in my heart" yet exactly how fickle do we as humans ultimately prove to be given enough time and change(s) to our circumstances?

Some might even suggest having "Moved On"?

Once again who are funerals for the living or for those who Truly ARE being REALIZED as "Dead"?

In terms of words that DO eventually manifest (come to life) and those that never die, what has God said about His words that will NOT return to Him "Void"?

Void (empty) of the purpose(s) for which He sent them to "Accomplish"? Is there a reason God tells those who will hear, that His words are Alive, Active and sharper than a double edged sword? And in another place concerning the Life apportioned by God?

Luke 20:38
He is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive ."
NIV

Why can't the conclusion drawn that does have to do with "The Will of God" be as simple as "God wants Children"? Does that somehow agree with "Until you become as one of theses little ones you'll Not see the kingdom of God"? And even further bring that next to "You Must be born again and that of God"

Why does such a "Consideration" seem to require getting bogged down in "Who those children truly are"?

Why doesn't the consideration NOT fit which suggest that "We are ALL Gods Children" as we now find ourselves"?

What is there to judge if all mankind are truly believed to be "Gods Children"? Without proportion, severity and/or reward weighing in on this matter who is ti that should have within them a righteous Fear of God who are also His "Children"?

If mankind were caught only looking at and considering himself, what might mankind fail to see? Will such a man fail to see where this same God informs mankind of the truth that 1/3 of the heavenly host that were created before men were also "Fell"?

Fell "Yes", but fell from what and "Why"?

And as such "Here and Now"?

It's one thing to stand on someone else's shoulders in order to enable another to see, yet is this still True if they're both standing in water that's "Over" their heads!

Why has religion and religious wars always revolved around everything which defines who "The Children of God are"? As such here and now that does inhabit the earth in a particular shape and form that dwells among men?

Is there any significance and/or substance to the notion that God does create with words? Real enough to you to where those words then interpret as "His words that have become flesh" and now dwell among us?

If it were all kept in perspective what is the human body in the Big picture that God is believed to have painted? And in terms of the "Potential" of an internal host that's also "Alive" or NOT, what can a man say or do that has ONLY to do with this divine potential ONLY God can provide?

Why is it so far fetched of a notion, where some people are a "Temporal" example of "Dead People Walking" when the one speaking is their creator who is also the ONLY one who can and does "Give" life to those as it pleases Him?

Why do the Apostle's who belong to Christ refer to the dead as those who are "Asleep" as well when God speaks in parables He suggest "Wake Up Oh sleeper" to those who are NOT in Christ so that Christ CAN shine upon them?

Why are humans inherently afraid of the Dark and some ALL their lives?

Maybe many are inherently justified in their fear of the dark and in "Terms" of what IS TRUE despite all that we presently can NOT see?

Especially when hearing AND "Truthfully" considering  an "Outer Darkness" where God says there will be "Weeping and the grinding of Teeth" throughout the remainder of eternity beyond the first death? What if this "Notion" that concerns the "Dark" has been misrepresented by men?

What if fear of the dark were intended to be an inherent, fearful yet subtle reminding notion of what does lie ahead for some?

Exactly where is the "Outer Darkness" God speaks of as if the address where those who choose NOT to be partakers of the "Son-ship" (adoption) He offers?

And that under the truthful terms of Christ BEING the Alpha and Omega and "The ALL in ALL" despite what any man thinks and fails to "SEE" in the heart he (man) also Considers to be his own?

The God I hear from, fear, believe and even more "Love" says, Everything in the earth belongs to Him, yet how many question that by way of suggesting all that belongs to their personage while also being here?

Exactly what is "Pro-vision"? And that BEING in direct proportion to what a man can or can NOT see and hear?

Exactly why was it found to be a punishable Crime committed against God where 1/3 of the angelic realm of heavenly host He (God) created were also cast down to a place prepared for them as well for those who would believe their lies above what God says is "True" and participating (Active and Alive)?

Is it all ONLY a matter of "Waking Up" OR does waking up have everything to do with the first stage of Growing Up and that In Christ?

In terms of agreeing with God, where the earth and everything found to be in it are a shadow of ALL that's true in Heaven that does belong to Him, "How do you find"?

Not only your own prayers "Belong to and For His name sake which suggest "Gods will be done on earth as is in heaven" but also....

1 John 4:17-18
In this way, love is made complete among us so that we will have confidence on the day of judgment,------

because in this world we are like him .

There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love. NIV

In all this being said, is it also safe to suggest the that if a person has any fear in them they're directly bound for hell?

I think that type of notion to be even more unwise and ill informed in the Truest sense!

Why? Because there is an acceptable type of fear that will lead some into the wisdom of God and there is also a "Justifiable" hatred towards all that God considers to be "Evil' in His sight.

Stumbling is still stumbling whether it be over a "Boulder" or a grain of sand.....yet what does one then see the day they do "Believe" that by Him and through Him were all things created both Great and small?

How and why can anyone find peace and rest in the midst of so much unreliable "Information"? Is it possible the introduction to so many lies and unknown variables can some how out pace what is True?

Many are willing to claim that God gave man a mind. A mind that is superior to the surrounding minds found in all the other creatures He also created, but is that enough?

And why does God give His spirit that has also been endowed with the "Mind of Christ" if what God has created has no further need in his (mans) decision making processes?

Acts 9:31
Then the church throughout Judea, Galilee and Samaria enjoyed a time of peace. It was strengthened; and encouraged by the Holy Spirit, it grew in numbers, living in the fear of the Lord .
NIV

To be continued.....