Search This Blog

Friday, June 22, 2018

The Morning After type of "Gospel"

Who can "Clearly" see why a person would "Refuse" to take their eyes off of the ONLY reason they do see clearly. sw

Under the premise a person can read words, does that also mean those same 'Type of Words" have been accurately Sourced? A Type of Words that have been afforded their "Complete" opportunity to prove what they're saying?

The complete Cycle of words also found within a type of Life Long struggle that was "Intended" to determine not only exactly WHO has "Spoken" but what is TRUE and JUST as important WHY specific words have been spoken in terms how the "Expected End" gets "Delivered" or NOT? 

Words that have been "Faithfully" delivered and received? Heard and received by those who've Honestly suggested they can "Hear" from and have "Believed" who the Source of those same words are as if the "One Speaking"? Able to Hear not only due to the appearance and nature of the messenger but due to the type of transparency which then leads to the Nature of the One heard speaking Through the messenger?

Who in this world will prove to have had many teachers yet ONLY One Lord and Master. sw

Shouldn't the question "Be", "Who can righteously Interpret and somehow righteously SOURCE any spoken words without the "Author" and "Origin" of those words proving to BE the only "Interpretation" that also "Manifest"?

They very specific TYPE of Manifestation which then "Proves" beyond doubt what has been spoken?The same type of manifestation that proves, yet proves what and to whom once it ALL has been said and done?

Exactly what is Wrong with those who are Impatient? Who Exactly is capable of somehow measuring how the True Potential and Full Scope of all that Time is without Believing who the giver of Time and Life truly is?

Maybe the REAL type of questions that are NOT being Asked could otherwise lead to "Proving" what is True? Questions such as 'Exactly whose house is the topic of discussion among ANY two or More People at any moment also believed t have been Provided By God? 

Exactly WHO does any house Truly "Belong To" and who is that sets the times and dates of any divine appointment without also being able to Hear from the Lord who's also Believed to Have orchestrated those same set of Circumstances?

Will this temporary present life ONLY prove to be who it IS that will also determine what wealth and riches somehow validate in the Land? Or the evidence which determines WHO the Children are? As though the type of words that have not only Claimed but proved Who's OWNED and sourced those same words?

And If Jesus the God sent Christ is the ONLY one who God considers to be "Upright" in all his decisions MADE while here, who then has also determined who their Lord, King and Savior is? Of the same type of family who have also lived through the same type of circumstances which "Test" the essence (spirit) of same?

Circumstances which the difference between what is Now and all that is to COME, yet ONLY "Then" ALL that does come was based on what? What has been said that is True or that produces what God says is TRUE?

If a mans salvation were ONLY left up to men to decide WHO the Children of God will BE, who then is left to determine otherwise the affects of everything that prevents ALL mankind from being saved?

If ONLY God determines who are His children, who then could find the evil that is within all mankind guilty of the type of REASONING involved which then speaks to WHY ALL haven fallen short of Gods Glory? One and the SAME Glory God describes as HIS CHILDREN who are going to BE revealed? And exactly what is the TRUE potential of ANY ...Revelation?

Of the same type that was otherwise made available to ALL mankind, "Once and for ALL"? Is it all only about "Projection" verses "Rejection"?

If yes, who then will in the End WILL have Proven to have Fallen short of such a reward that was also based on what Each and every soul Individually also believed to BE true?

Ps 112
Praise the LORD.

Blessed is the man who fears the LORD, who finds great delight in his commands.

His children will be mighty in the land; the generation of the upright will be blessed.
Wealth and riches are in his house, and his righteousness endures forever.

Even in darkness light dawns for the upright, for the gracious and compassionate and righteous man.  Good will come to him who is generous and lends freely, who conducts his affairs with justice. 

Surely he will never be shaken; a righteous man will be remembered forever. He will have no fear of bad news; his heart is steadfast, trusting in the LORD. 

His heart is secure, he will have no fear; in the end he will look in triumph on his foes.
He has scattered abroad his gifts to the poor, his righteousness endures forever; his horn will be lifted high in honor.

The wicked man will see and be vexed, he will gnash his teeth and waste away; the longings of the wicked will come to nothing.
NIV

In terms of truly getting to "Know a Person" who is "Willing" to extend the opportunity that allows someone other than the author to put Words in their mouth or alter the Intended meaning of what they've said?

Does being recognized as if the "First" person to say something also prove what they suggested is also True? At what point does the ability to "Forget" who said "What" also play its role.

How often today does society hear a Politicians adviser(s) or talking Heads in the media use the phrase, "You need to get Out in "Front" of this Issue"! Why exactly are very few satisfied with being categorically denied the First position or the "Post Narrative" that continues to struggle finding itself "Believable" in the so called "Main Stream"?

The type of 'Streaming" as if trolling for those who are willing to "Bite" based on what they've only Heard? Why is it that any fisher of Men also sees the need to Fish with a NET instead of a "Single" line?

What are they suggesting when they say "In Front"? Could it be they are aware if they are the First ones to be "Heard" and because they were first what they've said now has the Greater Burden in BEING proved to be wrong (perceived)?

And what is "News" if not the Type of Information that is received as though it is NEW!

Which is easier, to attempt to "Disprove" someone who has First (Stated) established their "Claim"? Or has it already been "Proven' it's much more difficult AFTER someone else has already made the FIRST Claim?

And if dishonesty does play a role, what would You conclude is the evil that has NEED of somehow being Fleshed or Flushed OUT? Exactly WHO knows where the damning evidence is and HOW would anyone KNOW where to look for same without first "Knowing" WHERE to find same? And who has First access to such evidence only because they DO KNOW?

What then remains the least OBVIOUS conclusion that could otherwise be drawn in terms of who knows what and why ANY type of behavior is also considered to be Evil in the sight of God despite what they are WILLING to momentarily admit?

And if God is NOT kept  FIRST in ALL things, who THEN as a result will also be found WILLING to suggest ANYTHING else SHOULD be considered FALSE or a "Lie"?

In the beginning, was there this type of Exchange Made in the Garden? The venue where the ONLY two "Beings" that could be questioned now find their Physical persons Face to Face with the offer to exchange the Truth God (FIRST) spoke to them for a Lie?

And the Truth behind the "Grand Standing" of the Mystery that's NOT being allowed to speak as to WHY the History of the 'Mankind" does keep repeating ITSELF?

Even though the event and context of this passage below was many years later, does that somehow disprove Adam and Eve believed the same one whom also presented his person in the form of a proverbial  Snake? This looks and sounds to me like the Mankind repeating the essence (spirit) of his History he continuously fails to truthfully Acknowledge, doesn't it?

Rom 1:25
5 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator — who is forever praised. Amen. NIV

2 Peter 1:20-21
Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation. For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.  NIV

Who today is Not BEING carried along by the Holy Spirit? Just as Important "Why Not"? Whether it be by way of being "Stiff Necked" or "Stiff Armed'  How does God consider either?

Will time ONLY prove the Wife to have been right in her claim made AGAINST her uncooperative Husband? The same type of claim made by the angered wife in the heat of a squabble with her Spouse....."Your Just Like Your Father"! Is she to be Proved RIGHT or WRONG despite her claim made?

At what point is ANYONE proved RIGHT or WRONG if has NOT been well established exactly WHO has been Carried along BY the Holy Spirit or NOT leading up to ANY debate or Argument between any Two people who ALSO claim to be OF GOD?

Acts 7:51-52
"You stiff-necked people, with uncircumcised hearts and ears! You are just like your fathers: You always resist the Holy Spirit! Was there ever a prophet your fathers did not persecute?
NIV


Is the greatest "religious" oriented question today simply "Who said What"  Or should it be WHO is speaking as if From the Heart of God or NOT within the set of circumstances God put into "Motion" without allowing the Emotions generated by a mans "Naked Soul" somehow get in the proverbial WAY?

And if a Naked Soul were understood to be a Soul that has taken a STAND as if alone WITHOUT the Counsel of The Spirit of God at their side? And exactly what TWO can also put to FLIGHT 10,000 if God is NOT one of those TWO who taken their stand together?

Should a person want "Try" to understand his spiritual culture, at what point does this type of person need to slow down or on occasion even STOP what they're doing in order to process the direction they're  headed? And HOW have many today are also SEEN or are TRULY desirous of understanding the depth of meaning whenever they suggest they have or ARE REPENTING?

Do many today who suggest they're worshiping God in Spirit and in Truth somehow trying to SEE (view) repentance God accepts as some type of tangible or materialistic TRADE off?

Exactly who today is the "Prime Example" of the type of Son who is capable of Spiritually "Multitasking"? Doing whatever it is no matter 'Where" He is because He can SEE whatever it is His Father is doing?

And the TRUE inheritance of a Son is "What"? The fact the Son has "Believed" he truly is His Fathers Son? And as such ONLY because of what He CAN SEE or everything the son WANTS to SEE?

How does the Son prove all that he as a son CAN SEE unless the Father has shown Him? And who would know better whether or NOT the Father truly has revealed His person to His sons or NOT?

John 14:6-7
Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you really knew me, you would know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him."
NIV

Does a Son in his struggle to SEE what the Father is DOING depend on whether or NOT His Father WILL Keep His promise? Or does the Sons Struggle(s) begin based on what the Son TRULY does "BELIEVE" with ALL his Heart, Mind, Soul and Strength the world around this same son labors to somehow "Disprove"?

The very specific type of ALL only the FATHER can "Measure' accurately?

And exactly what is FAITH towards God? Is it the type of Faith that has been "Aimed" only in the General  direction of God? Who today STANDS in the TRUE Hope of somehow being seen and recognized by God as a "Straight Shooter"?

The type of "Straight Shooter" whose Heart God does know because God is His Sons Creator, Progenitor and does know beyond doubt what True DESIRE to hit the Mark looks like in ACTION despite the occasional mark that's Missed?

Exactly How can a TRUE Son GO WRONG if and when this type of Son is ONLY trying to do what His FATHER is DOING?

Is a Father displeased because the Son Fails when TRYING? Or Is God more displeased when He knows the desires of His son are NOT ....His own or that doesn't even ATTEMPT due to Lack of Faith In God? And without Faith that based ONLY in God and ALL that Gd has said why would it also be said of God that it's "Impossible" to also please WHO in the absence of Faith?

John 5:16-20
So, because Jesus was doing these things on the Sabbath, the Jews persecuted him. Jesus said to them, "My Father is always at his work to this very day, and I, too, am working." For this reason the Jews tried all the harder to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God. 

Jesus gave them this answer: "I tell you the truth, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing , because whatever the Father does the Son also does. For the Father loves the Son and shows him all he does. Yes, to your amazement he will show him even greater things than these.
NIV



No comments:

Post a Comment