Jer 42:4
"I have heard you ," replied Jeremiah the prophet. "I will certainly pray to the LORD your God as you have requested; I will tell you everything the LORD says and will keep nothing back from you."
NIV
Have you ever contemplated "Why" it is the religious sect of humanity that somehow assumes it knows ALL to well exactly "Why" and "Who" the true prophets of God are? The same ones who will rarely listen to what anyone has to say in terms of hearing the entire matter? Those who are supposedly "Listening" for the specifics in terms of the added benefits and probability of having been visited by a prophet of God?
Can anyone truly attack the person of God in terms of somehow doing Him harm or does a man merely try and assault the words He's spoken only later to "Realize" to his on hurt?
The type of divine gesture that also suggest what should God choose to speak to "Any" person mouth to ear?
Have you ever studied the faces of those type of people were they to hear you suggest aloud, "God Told Me'?
In terms of what is truly said and Heard, what exactly is the depth of the claim and response of "Christ In You"? And if Jesus said every thing he did, wanted and/or needed to say during his physical visitation, who today could in any fashion add to, compliment or somehow take away from same?
Have you ever engaged the 'Why" behind the message of someone who's considered to 'Be" a practicing "Politician"? The type who are always sending out messages they would love nothing more than to see their message to have become 'Effectual"? Effectual maybe, yet why is any type of message considered not only to be effectual without also considering the likeness of the messenger?
(As merely a side note, and under the terms of true leadership, what would You suggest would change on a truly LEVEL playing field if a politician was mandated to subject their person and their entire household to the exact same laws, resulting benefits whether health care or retirement they suggested they were going to fight for and implement?)
Why is it the said "Hearer" always seems to get to decide what's best? At what point does the one speaking somehow influence what gets 'Heard"? I think it true we all learn at an early age how to defend against hearing Bad Information in term of putting to Good use said "Logic", yet what happens whenever 'Bad Information" is used when teaching and training ones Logical approach to the things said Life presents?
Why can't the words of God be weighed in the same fashion? Maybe they are? What exactly would you consider to be the "Effectual Communication" of ones faith? That is to say as compared to the type message that "Promises" to deliver "Specific's" verses "Vague" or hard to "Understand" plans that may or may "Not" include the hearer?
Where's the measurement of ANY promise that's been "Made"? As such without also considering the type of person who also decides the fate of another's "Disappointment"?
You and I can sit and debate what Faith is all day, yet what happens if the type of Faith Jesus wants to see when He returns were to reflect poorly on either of our own definition(s)? As if somehow opposed to what Jesus says the True potential of (Net Results) of a heavenly defined "Faith" will also "Produce"?
Can anyone truly attack the person of God in terms of somehow doing Him harm or does a man merely try and assault the words He's spoken only later to "Realize" to his on hurt?
The type of divine gesture that also suggest what should God choose to speak to "Any" person mouth to ear?
Have you ever studied the faces of those type of people were they to hear you suggest aloud, "God Told Me'?
In terms of what is truly said and Heard, what exactly is the depth of the claim and response of "Christ In You"? And if Jesus said every thing he did, wanted and/or needed to say during his physical visitation, who today could in any fashion add to, compliment or somehow take away from same?
Have you ever engaged the 'Why" behind the message of someone who's considered to 'Be" a practicing "Politician"? The type who are always sending out messages they would love nothing more than to see their message to have become 'Effectual"? Effectual maybe, yet why is any type of message considered not only to be effectual without also considering the likeness of the messenger?
(As merely a side note, and under the terms of true leadership, what would You suggest would change on a truly LEVEL playing field if a politician was mandated to subject their person and their entire household to the exact same laws, resulting benefits whether health care or retirement they suggested they were going to fight for and implement?)
Why is it the said "Hearer" always seems to get to decide what's best? At what point does the one speaking somehow influence what gets 'Heard"? I think it true we all learn at an early age how to defend against hearing Bad Information in term of putting to Good use said "Logic", yet what happens whenever 'Bad Information" is used when teaching and training ones Logical approach to the things said Life presents?
Why can't the words of God be weighed in the same fashion? Maybe they are? What exactly would you consider to be the "Effectual Communication" of ones faith? That is to say as compared to the type message that "Promises" to deliver "Specific's" verses "Vague" or hard to "Understand" plans that may or may "Not" include the hearer?
Where's the measurement of ANY promise that's been "Made"? As such without also considering the type of person who also decides the fate of another's "Disappointment"?
You and I can sit and debate what Faith is all day, yet what happens if the type of Faith Jesus wants to see when He returns were to reflect poorly on either of our own definition(s)? As if somehow opposed to what Jesus says the True potential of (Net Results) of a heavenly defined "Faith" will also "Produce"?
How many believers in what God has said are willing to wait?
And should the need arise, continue to wait for the "Appearance" (manifestation) of Gods power and authority? Especially if the person in "Question" has no 'Earthly" idea not only what God does NOT look like and as such namely because that same God has declared that He Is Spirit?
John 4:23-24
(Jesus Declared)...... God is spirit , and his worshipers must worship in spirit and in truth."
NIV
That being said and heard as if Believable, who then can truly remain a Hold Out (Called Out) as to whether or not God is steadfast and remains "Willing" to act/perform Spiritually on behalf of anyone? Without also adding acting on their behalf in "This World" and in a Positive fashion?
The type of power and authority that manifest and transcends in an ever increasing measure, all doubt and unbelief? The same type of power that not only appears as His Power (Grace) as well why He as God decides however he does about anything? The type of response which also reflects upon "The Lords good, pleasing and perfect Will"?
That said, only if you truly do "Care enough to at least "Want to Know" what pleases Him as if He As Lord and Your Christ is Real to You?
Especially when considering the Golden rule that also agree's with Wisdom from God that speaks about a type of divine married man (spiritual) who Loves his wife in part because he has, does and continues willingly to learn how and why to love himself?
Eph 5:10-11
........ and find out what pleases the Lord. NIV
Rom 12:2
Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is — his good, pleasing and perfect will.
NIV
If God is truly in control over everything, why would anyone ever complain about anything? That is to also suggest talking primarily "To" and about "Those" who also suggest they "Believe In God"?
Why would the said leaders of Gods church in the earth have need of somehow being tasked with somehow convincing Gods people also in the earth they can't 'Know" Gods "Will" with any REAL specificity?
John 17:3
Now this is eternal life : that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. NIV
What good does it profit a man to somehow exhibit what is "Right" if the other mans imperfection keeps getting in the WAY of somehow replicating what is "Right"? At what point does the child of "Wisdom" go on to prove that True wisdom in any situation is always the Right Choice?
Is God only thought to BE a Poetic novelist?
If God is Spirit and it is ONLY His children can truly worship His person in Spirit and In Truth, why all the fuss about who's who in this world while arguing about the activities that are also taking place in another realm namely 'Heaven"?
The very prayers offered to this same God of Heaven sent from an address here on earth that verbally suggest His Will Be done on earth as it is In Heaven?
Rev 2:20-23
Nevertheless, I have this against you: You tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess. By her teaching she misleads my servants into sexual immorality and the eating of food sacrificed to idols. I have given her time to repent of her immorality, but she is unwilling. So I will cast her on a bed of suffering, and I will make those who commit adultery with her suffer intensely, unless they repent of her ways. I will strike her children dead. Then all the churches will know that I am he who searches hearts and minds, and I will repay each of you according to your deeds.
NIV
In terms of what every "One" chooses to believe to be True about God, how has the "Trial and Errors" of this methodology served most to date? A type process which also suggest what if not the swing and miss approach? Does God throw nothing but fast balls?
All the above while claiming to understand or NOT that "Anything that does not come from Faith is Sin"? And if Sin, who is NOT repenting having recognized Sin for all that God says the nature of Sin commits itself to do? As if to suggest a type of Fruit which may or may NOT have been produced or thought wise to consume in the Light of the Truth?
How fitting TODAY would some find the critical words of Christ spoken back then? As if everything God had said was also pointing directly towards the same Christ and representative God eventually sent?
Mark 12:24
Jesus replied, "Are you not in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God ? NIV
Is there a deeper meaning for some when the consideration of rising from the dead goes far beyond the events only their physical bodies endure? What happens when a person allows their minds to be convinced their physical bodies somehow "Cloak" the combined sense of awareness of their spirit and soul?
At what point does the votes cast by the body somehow outweigh the combined determination of the spirit and soul? A two to one vote (elect) cast which then suggest the body should otherwise also do what? Only then to witness the body do just the opposite of what the spirit and soul KNOW what NOT to do?
Where exactly can the sinful nature be found when its something understood to be some mysterious consideration within a person? Especially whenever someone is truthfully looking for same as though a 'Sinful" consideration that has need of being put to death?
At what point do the words of God bring not only the needed sword in order to put same to death but also in terms of obedience help bring to pass the sense of 'Divine" division within a man (Person)? The type division that is capable of dividing spirit and soul? Bone from its marrow and connecting tissue(s)? Quite the word picture in my mind!
Whenever something is considered to be functioning in "Stealth Mode" what does this suggest?
Eph 5:8-14
For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) and find out what pleases the Lord.
Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. For it is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret. But everything exposed by the light becomes visible, for it is light that makes everything visible. This is why it is said:
"Wake up, O sleeper, rise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you."
NIV
These same ones who have need of remaining vague in their assessment of God as those who also suggest that only Time will tell the truth? All the above while forgetting where it has been said of God exactly where the Power of God resides as well where it doesn't and why?
Have you ever been ask did Jesus do ANYTHING differently than did God? The same God whom also says the beloved of God should also DO likewise? What is a lose-lose situation if asked to do or accomplish something that's also "Impossible? And what if all that is considered to 'Be" the impossible is Everything that God was NOT a party to same?
If NOT, why Not? If ANYTHING is to be considered the IMPOSSIBLE without God and more likely to be described as the miraculous, who then can claim anything less than all the above is TRUE?
Many are familiar with the term the "Buck Stops Here" yet who's not asking where does God begin or end to include all that He as God is WILLING to do?
How did Jesus so decisively and quickly assess the will of God in ANY given moment?
John 7:17
If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine , whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself. KJV
Mark 12:24
Jesus replied, "Are you not in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God ? NIV
Rom 1:16-17
I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. For in the gospel a righteousness from God is revealed, a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written: "The righteous will live by faith."
NIV
And should the need arise, continue to wait for the "Appearance" (manifestation) of Gods power and authority? Especially if the person in "Question" has no 'Earthly" idea not only what God does NOT look like and as such namely because that same God has declared that He Is Spirit?
John 4:23-24
(Jesus Declared)...... God is spirit , and his worshipers must worship in spirit and in truth."
NIV
The type of power and authority that manifest and transcends in an ever increasing measure, all doubt and unbelief? The same type of power that not only appears as His Power (Grace) as well why He as God decides however he does about anything? The type of response which also reflects upon "The Lords good, pleasing and perfect Will"?
That said, only if you truly do "Care enough to at least "Want to Know" what pleases Him as if He As Lord and Your Christ is Real to You?
Especially when considering the Golden rule that also agree's with Wisdom from God that speaks about a type of divine married man (spiritual) who Loves his wife in part because he has, does and continues willingly to learn how and why to love himself?
Eph 5:10-11
........ and find out what pleases the Lord. NIV
Rom 12:2
Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is — his good, pleasing and perfect will.
NIV
Why would the said leaders of Gods church in the earth have need of somehow being tasked with somehow convincing Gods people also in the earth they can't 'Know" Gods "Will" with any REAL specificity?
John 17:3
Now this is eternal life : that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. NIV
What good does it profit a man to somehow exhibit what is "Right" if the other mans imperfection keeps getting in the WAY of somehow replicating what is "Right"? At what point does the child of "Wisdom" go on to prove that True wisdom in any situation is always the Right Choice?
Is God only thought to BE a Poetic novelist?
If God is Spirit and it is ONLY His children can truly worship His person in Spirit and In Truth, why all the fuss about who's who in this world while arguing about the activities that are also taking place in another realm namely 'Heaven"?
The very prayers offered to this same God of Heaven sent from an address here on earth that verbally suggest His Will Be done on earth as it is In Heaven?
Rev 2:20-23
Nevertheless, I have this against you: You tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess. By her teaching she misleads my servants into sexual immorality and the eating of food sacrificed to idols. I have given her time to repent of her immorality, but she is unwilling. So I will cast her on a bed of suffering, and I will make those who commit adultery with her suffer intensely, unless they repent of her ways. I will strike her children dead. Then all the churches will know that I am he who searches hearts and minds, and I will repay each of you according to your deeds.
NIV
What if a man did know what caused God to act in a said "Negative or Positive" fashion while also claiming man does not and is incapable of knowing Gods Will in ANY type of God provided scenario?
Exactly why is anything a man can "SAY" is then considered to be somehow be different than when God has said the same things? What exactly is it about mankind that can somehow SPOIL those same spoken words? Exactly how may sides of a veil are there? As if in comparison to the type and reason for wearing a veil as did Moses when descending down the mountain from the presents of God into the midst of Gods chosen people?
1 Tim 3:14-16
Although I hope to come to you soon, I am writing you these instructions so that, if I am delayed, you will know how people ought to conduct themselves in God's household, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth. Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great:
He appeared in a body, was vindicated by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was preached among the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory.
NIV
Not everyone believes God do they? Not everyone has seen God have they? Not everyone has Heard from God have they? Not everyone will be taken up into the presence of His Glory AND remain there will they?
All the above while claiming to understand or NOT that "Anything that does not come from Faith is Sin"? And if Sin, who is NOT repenting having recognized Sin for all that God says the nature of Sin commits itself to do? As if to suggest a type of Fruit which may or may NOT have been produced or thought wise to consume in the Light of the Truth?
How fitting TODAY would some find the critical words of Christ spoken back then? As if everything God had said was also pointing directly towards the same Christ and representative God eventually sent?
Mark 12:24
Jesus replied, "Are you not in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God ? NIV
Is there a deeper meaning for some when the consideration of rising from the dead goes far beyond the events only their physical bodies endure? What happens when a person allows their minds to be convinced their physical bodies somehow "Cloak" the combined sense of awareness of their spirit and soul?
At what point does the votes cast by the body somehow outweigh the combined determination of the spirit and soul? A two to one vote (elect) cast which then suggest the body should otherwise also do what? Only then to witness the body do just the opposite of what the spirit and soul KNOW what NOT to do?
Where exactly can the sinful nature be found when its something understood to be some mysterious consideration within a person? Especially whenever someone is truthfully looking for same as though a 'Sinful" consideration that has need of being put to death?
At what point do the words of God bring not only the needed sword in order to put same to death but also in terms of obedience help bring to pass the sense of 'Divine" division within a man (Person)? The type division that is capable of dividing spirit and soul? Bone from its marrow and connecting tissue(s)? Quite the word picture in my mind!
Whenever something is considered to be functioning in "Stealth Mode" what does this suggest?
Eph 5:8-14
For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) and find out what pleases the Lord.
Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. For it is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret. But everything exposed by the light becomes visible, for it is light that makes everything visible. This is why it is said:
"Wake up, O sleeper, rise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you."
NIV
Have you ever been ask did Jesus do ANYTHING differently than did God? The same God whom also says the beloved of God should also DO likewise? What is a lose-lose situation if asked to do or accomplish something that's also "Impossible? And what if all that is considered to 'Be" the impossible is Everything that God was NOT a party to same?
If NOT, why Not? If ANYTHING is to be considered the IMPOSSIBLE without God and more likely to be described as the miraculous, who then can claim anything less than all the above is TRUE?
Many are familiar with the term the "Buck Stops Here" yet who's not asking where does God begin or end to include all that He as God is WILLING to do?
How did Jesus so decisively and quickly assess the will of God in ANY given moment?
John 7:17
If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine , whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself. KJV
Jesus replied, "Are you not in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God ? NIV
Rom 1:16-17
I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. For in the gospel a righteousness from God is revealed, a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written: "The righteous will live by faith."
NIV
Is God the father of Time alone or the Father of His children? The first of those beloved being "Who" if not "The Christ" who God also "Sent" to those He loves?
All the above having been framed by the sin filled type of thoughts that have a history of conveying that God intended to remain One BIG mystery to those He says he loves?
The truth that was sent having very little to do with what? The appearance or credentials of the messenger? When the bible is allowed to speak, how often do the stories recorded there are also allowed to govern what God given discernment looks like in REAL TIME? I'll provide an example of not only authority but what happens when the God sourced discernment becomes "Applicable".
2 Sam 1:14-19
David asked him, "Why were you not afraid to lift your hand to destroy the LORD's anointed?"
15 Then David called one of his men and said, "Go, strike him down!" So he struck him down, and he died. For David had said to him, "Your blood be on your own head. Your own mouth testified against you when you said, 'I killed the LORD's anointed.'"
17 David took up this lament concerning Saul and his son Jonathan, 18 and ordered that the men of Judah be taught this lament of the bow (it is written in the Book of Jashar):
"Your glory, O Israel, lies slain on your heights. How the mighty have fallen! NIV
Have you ever deeply considered what is being suggested when someone advises you, "Think it through"? How can someone think anything "Through" as if its true "Finality" unless it is possible to somehow see the "End" benefit of having done so?
And if someone is incapable of thinking a matter "Through" or thoroughly, how can the type of "hope" that is also true somehow find a "Way" to rescue them from making a bad decision? The net results which also prove a bad decision that will only manifest in the said "Future" tense?
Truly what is the essence within any given moment that's also clearly understood to be "Intense" in terms of what a person fears "Most" in their Life? How might the fear of the Lord help someone also make a Good decision? Especially while claiming to understand not that ONLY God is Good all the time, but also the Beginning of "wisdom" is the "Fear of the Lord"?
Without knowing beyond doubt what the exact cause was in KING David having this young man Struck down by the sword, whom also stands in the face of the same 'Risk" by way of giving a bad testimony to the King?
Today we as believers have a great privilege as those whom God recognizes as those who do know the truth beyond doubt because we also know why we also believe what was recorded elsewhere in SAME bible which speaks the truth about what took place at the death of Saul.
That said, how Important might it prove to know beyond doubt whether or NOT David as King during his own tenure here on earth also enjoyed true reward as a Prophet of God? Will your answer only depend upon what you've been told or what you think you need a prophet to look like today before accepting a prophet ONLY because they are a prophet Of God?
Exactly how does TIME or the contents of Time ever get taken out of Context? Especially so when Time is also considered to be the ONLY type of father many are willing to Believe?
God is spirit and unless you Too are also willing to acknowledge what any spirit within you also looks and acts like, how WILL anyone ever come to know who their true Father is or NOT?
Acts 2:29-31
"Brothers, I can tell you confidently that the patriarch David died and was buried, and his tomb is here to this day. But he was a prophet and knew that God had promised him on oath that he would place one of his descendants on his throne. Seeing what was ahead, he spoke of the resurrection of the Christ, that he was not abandoned to the grave, nor did his body see decay.
NIV
Would ANY one who's also NOT an enemy OF GOD have even gone to WAR against the "Anointed" of the One True God namely "Saul" if they also feared that God seated him (Saul) as King for whatever reason?
How many believers today who claim Christ in them truly KNOW what they "Believe" without also knowing what qualifies who the enemies of God look and act like while coexisting in the future Tense as compared?
1 Sam 31:4-6
Saul said to his armor-bearer, "Draw your sword and run me through, or these uncircumcised fellows will come and run me through and abuse me."
But his armor-bearer was terrified and would not do it; so Saul took his own sword and fell on it. When the armor-bearer saw that Saul was dead, he too fell on his sword and died with him. So Saul and his three sons and his armor-bearer and all his men died together that same day.
NIV
1 Chron 10:2-6
The fighting grew fierce around Saul, and when the archers overtook him, they wounded him.
Saul said to his armor-bearer, "Draw your sword and run me through, or these uncircumcised fellows will come and abuse me."
But his armor-bearer was terrified and would not do it; so Saul took his own sword and fell on it. When the armor-bearer saw that Saul was dead, he too fell on his sword and died. So Saul and his three sons died, and all his house died together.
NIV
My personal belief system revolves around the instructions given of God which suggest it is the TRUTH that sets men free and not the messenger or what anyone thinks about an otherwise "Innocent" messenger who feels compelled to prove his SELF. That is until the messenger has been proved not having been SENT of God. More often merely by hearing their testimony as if God hears EVERY word whether idly spoken in jest or as if from the Mouth of God.
Does it truly matter exactly how OLD or antiquated the words of God might SEEM to an Individual or more importantly how naive youth can be while assuming being Old somehow does away what is still relevant and applicable today?
What is the difference between a messenger of God and someone who is only claiming to have been sent of God? The same could be asked of someone claiming to be an Apostle, Pastor, Teacher, Evangelist or Prophet? Even more as if today the church needs the lessor of anything God originally provided to the church for her strengthening in light of the "Present" condition of a said Bride who's had thousands of years while waiting in the beautiful HOPE of the entire sanctification Process appointed unto the Body Of Christ that is also ONE?
In terms of the acceptance of spoken words and words spoken that are said to be "Of God" exactly who is it today that is deciding as if for themselves in THIS WORLD whenever God is speaking? Not only speaking but how what has been said as if from God then gets "Interpreted"?
At times I poke fun at my wife about her being what I call a "Whisperer". Often without invite, she's somehow become convinced she can interpret (as if beyond doubt in her mind) what our dog is suggesting by way of its bark and behavior. In recent years she has since gone on to get her Masters degree in "Child Whispering".
The brunt of the joke being "WHY" it is that she can claims she does know that I clearly have ears that can hear the same noise she does , yet my personal understanding of what "I hear" also requires her "additional" narrative being HEARD. I asked her not tool long ago should I consider myself dead when she starts speaking for me too AFTER I speak my peace~ sw
No comments:
Post a Comment