Search This Blog

Friday, March 1, 2019

Taking the Lead

For what its worth I met up with a new word recently, "Illocutionary". Not only that but according to those who assume they make the rules for interpretation there are several different type actions that are also relative to gaining a better understanding of this particular word and it many applications.

For the sake of "Effectual" communication exactly how satisfied would you consider most people are without added body gesturing whenever they speak? Picture a person with the hands and feet bound trying to convey a specific thought (Image)? What can be said without the complementary use of their eyes, limbs and/or Body? What could also be said without finding one has need of somehow borrowing from something someone else has already supposedly spoken and MADE clear?

That is also to suggest without the need for a "Jury" or PUBLIC opinion weighing In" on the matter in terms of hoping to TIP the scales?

And if a person were trying to consider the voice of God as if  "The" talking "Head" that was also intended to be heard far above "All" others? The type of 'Sounding" source that has no waiving extremities that might otherwise add to or take away from the hearers focus? Simply put what was said that also came from THE Mouth of this HEAD is ALL there is to consider?

As if stripping the pre-fix (word) "Art" from the spelled out enunciation "Articulate"?  Having done so what exactly remains? Do these type of words or sounds have any stand alone value in Modern day English language? What about the difference between Abram and Abra-ham?

Is it 'Speech" alone or the "Ability" to speak that is truly a type of ART? What of the claim to fame that suggest a Creator of ALL things who simply SPOKE things into their varied states of (manifestation) Existence? Wouldn't it depend on what an "Individual" is capable of accomplishing in terms of being the One who's at the "Helm" in the proverbial "Wheel House"?

Have you ever truly traced out the origin of the metaphor in terms of the "Hand" that is also "Writing on the Wall"? Who exactly did such a hand belong to? The hand that pierced the veil of the otherwise unknown (yet to BE realized)? Exactly how would Being the Oldest Version of ANYTHING also PROVE to be the very source of that same thing?

Remember the show "Adams Family"? Exactly who was Adam? Remember cousin "IT"? What about the one (hand) that was named and summoned by way of being called "THING"? Who exactly COULD call them anything different  if they were the originals version of those same things?

The English language is one of the most ambiguous known to man. I can only assume the "Real Reason", yet what would you and I discover without the Greeks of antiquity somehow weighing in as if those who also have the "Final say"? Is there any real hope of conveying what our minds eye can see without finding our type of person having to borrow from an Unknown Source that might have also expired?

What about the more recently adopted acronym "AI" today (Art-ificial Intelligence)? Who used to be our cultures well respected go to source of collected (Collated) wisdom? Especially in terms of the ROOT words societies commonly use in order to Translate idioms, philosophy, Origins and/or theories? Webster's? Britannica? National Geo-graphic or TIME magazine"?

Is Cortona going be the replacement Voice of  "Reason? Is it possible the voice of LOGIC or REASON can TRULY be mapped out?

In biblical terms, who was said to be the Root (vine) and who was said to be the Branches and more importantly WHY? Why is IT some will allow God to explain the Tree and the roots of that same tree in search of nutrients, yet the same individuals will NOT allow that same creator (God) to explain the very NATURE of the 'Mankind"?

Rom 1:19-20
 20 For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse
NIV

Who can explain how God who is also Spirit can be in ALL and through ALL and by Him were ALL things created without also considering He spoke same into existence. sw

Not only are there far too many miscommunication this side of mind reading, but in large part due to what? Assumptions, Assertions, misguided Hope and Repetitious acceptance (Traditions) in terms of what we think people are trying to say? Traditional speech that has somehow morphed into a type of "Doctrine" we hear quite often? Heard so OFTEN we begin to believe what we hear because we DO hear same so often?

What if the Label or Name, "Religion" were being used as nothing more than a dis-tractor? The type of distraction that has done nothing more than get in the way of the PERSON better Known as Jesus the CHRIST? As if the ONE who was "Sent of God"? The ONLY faithful messenger who's History is EVERYTHING His NAME says it Is?

sw

Hopefully to be continued 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No comments:

Post a Comment