When Jesus saw her weeping, and the Jews who had come with her also weeping, he was deeply moved in spirit and troubled. "Where have you laid him?" he asked.
"Come and see, Lord," they replied.
35 Jesus wept .
36 Then the Jews said, "See how he loved him!" NIV
Have you ever ask yourself does God cry? And if "Yes" how does a man somehow "See" the God of man that does Cry?
Who and/or what is it that defines what a spiritual battle looks like?
Exactly how much does any man seemingly get away with because he does deny "Christ" His lawful right of ownership?
Exactly why is it so hard for a man to reconcile being a slave unto Christ on one hand while hearing of the beauty of his (mans) "Freedom" that can ONLY be found "In Christ" in the same breath?
How much does the "Reality" of the thought where "Two personalities do become and ACT together as if "One" take on a life of that's been "Owned"?
Exactly where in this world can such a shining example of this "Consideration" be found? Today can it be found within the vow of "Marriage" that's also been "Righteously" defined and accepted?
As it pertains to this type of "Image", what is it that's in need of being "exerted" and how might it "Be" expressed beyond it original and greatest "Portrayal"?
In terms of accurately defining ANYTHING, how important does the source of ANY definition then "Become" what it claims itself to "Be"?
Exactly how does someone who denies encountering Christ also claim to have the Love of their creator in them? How does any soul reconcile having never seen the God sent Christ go on to claim they have since discovered what Love is and does while in this world?
Maybe this passage should become the phrase which then further defines the phrase "Read it and weep" .....
1 John 4:12
No one has ever seen God; but if we love one another, God lives in us and his love is made complete in us. NIV
1 John 4:19-21
We love because he first loved us.
If anyone says, "I love God," yet hates his brother, he is a liar. For anyone who does not love his brother, whom he has seen, cannot love God, whom he has not seen. And he has given us this command: Whoever loves God must also love his brother.
NIV
What is it about the particular circumstances of any man who denies having been created by the living will of One and the same "Creator"? As such that also causes this claim to be different than other claims that have been "Made"?
Why does it seem to remain so "Important" within the "Reasoning" of any man that he (man) remains in control over not only his own "Thoughts" but the "Thought Liveliness" of others?
The type of thoughts which DO lend themselves to the calling within having been created by "One and the same Creator"? Why is there a tendency to diligently push back against such a "Divine Thought Process"?
Exactly what does the man look and act like that can righteously "Make" (substantiate) the claim" in that he does belong to God?
Truly what can ANY man make (create) that has NOT already been made?
Surely man can combine and formulate things from what has been made, but the question was "What is man capable of making (creating)" and how does a man source any of those ingredients needed in order to "Make" (create) anything he also claims he has made?
Is there such a thing as a "False claim" of one's inheritance?
If "Yes", what would make (cause) any claim to ultimately be "Found" to be a "False Claim"? Wouldn't the proof of the false claim require the "Rightful owner" coming along and proving his/her "Ownership" which then displaces all other claims?
Luke 13:26-27
"Then you will say, 'We ate and drank with you, and you taught in our streets.'
"But he will reply, 'I don't know you or where you come from. Away from me, all you evildoers!'
NIV
How much of that consideration also has to do with the return of "The Christ" as the rightful owner of ALL things? Especially whenever "Religious" affiliation get established, exerted and/or implemented here in the earth?
Take any two religious mindsets of any given day and seat them as if "In opposition to each other"? Exactly what is it that will ultimately prove either to be "Righteous" in their "Claim(s)" each supposedly "Makes"?
When someone considers what was "Created" only through the eyes and ears of his "Flesh" what and/or how much does that man fail to hear and as a result "See"?
Yet what happens when that same man has the eyes and ears of a new "God given (sourced) spirit" awakened, "How much more "Can" this same man then see once the eyes and ears of this "New" spirit enters in?
Rom 8:19-21
The creation waits in eager expectation for the sons of God to be revealed.
For the creation was subjected to frustration , not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the glorious freedom of the children of God.
NIV
The claim of ignorance being found to be so attractive in the same light of all that has been "Made" and is readily available in terms of the person of God that's gone to such great lengths to make Himself known throughout the ages?
Rom 1:20
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse .NIV
The same "No Name" personage other than "The thief" that would go on to be with Christ in paradise?
That to suggest that without the seemingly (vague) story which leads up to this man (thief) somehow being glorified, the story being told of the "Son Of God" would somehow pale in comparison if the thief who did go on to "Paradise" with Christ were NOT mentioned?
The same type of nature which claims to be wise "Enough" in many moments that ultimately prove to be what leads him (man) into the ultimate proving ground(s) where he (man) then claims the "Need" for the intervention of Christ (God)?
At what point does repeating this cycle of a seemingly common nature find resolution and that while knowing in advance "All that Christ came in order to accomplish and Why?
When the challenge presents itself having chosen Christ as "Lord and Savior" who then goes out and acts as if he's forgotten the meaning of His title as "Lord". sw
At what point does the depth of the consideration, "What does Christ save you from" sink in?
At what point does the suggestion "Jesus as YOUR Lord" find the opportunity to truly present Himself as if Your "Lord and "Savior"? And that without truly acknowledging exactly what it is He does in fact save anyone from?
Why can't the confession of "Christ as Lord" openly and plainly make the "Clear" statement that He in all truth saves us from the net result of ourselves in our spiritually naked decisions made?
Otherwise how can the wickedness of men be considered the things he (Man) does?
Is He (Christ) only focused on proving His lordship over YOU or is He (Christ) also just as much concerned about those who actually do "Prove" what they suggest they also "Approve of" (believe). sw
What does the mastery of anything truly look and sound like without accepting having been given the authority over these same considerations. sw
Truly Christ is the only one who has walked this earth in the full scope of all that perfection is, yet who will allow anyone other than Christ to inform (re-mind) them about the personage of God. sw
Especially to those who "Suggest" they do know more today than they did yesterday about what is considered to be righteous in the sight of God. sw
Without accepting with the full awareness of who it truly was at his side could the thief on the cross also claimed to be ignorant of who was that needed to find forgiveness. sw
When does the availability of time interpret as if something "More" one has been given beyond that of others. sw
Under the terms of the "Inspired words of God" and who oit is that will also be found worthy of their delivery?
Are these words still applicable today?
If there is an agreement to be reached, who then is the door man that will allow the words of anyone to meet with and somehow reason with his soul?
Gal 4:19-20
My dear children, for whom I am again in the pains of childbirth until Christ is formed in you, how I wish I could be with you now and change my tone, because I am perplexed about you!
NIV
No comments:
Post a Comment