Taking the Lead (Part II)

What about things being spoken about the Grace that is of God and as such without correction for the sake what? A false encounter with supposed Grace?

Grace being spoken of and assumed extended under the ruse of the type of person who wants to be considered Graceful or Gracious? What about people thought and said to be using "Tactful" speech?

Tactician noun

1. a person who uses a carefully planned strategy to achieve a specific end.

Who in and Of this world also knows much more than they too have been told about an expected "End" without the consideration that also speaks to exactly Who it is that also validates ANY prophecy?

I can't speak for you, yet I've come to know better over the course of time many liars as well there's very little difference in the minds of most who do tell lies in terms of a "Scheme" verses a "Strategy".

These are only two of many words in our language often used interchangeably. Even further words used to somehow express what is rarely accepted as True or Absolute also relative to words being accepted at face value such as "Cause, Affect, Effect and other words such as "Because". Is it even possible words such as these can make an impression upon our minds without offering well thought word picture as an accompanying Image?

I can still remember only a couple of instances (the rest are blurred for some reason) when I as a child would ask my parents 'Why" they had laid down the "Law" in a certain fashion ONLY they seemed to understand? How many of you also met with the type response, "Because, I said so"! Because what?

They had  said so and that was supposed to clarify "Exactly" what? Just think today about whenever someone references the proverbial and otherwise mysterious "They" we continue to hear from in antiquity? As if the immediate talking point that "Was" in play had mysteriously reached an abrupt conclusion, yet based on WHAT Facts or truth?

Just think what something as simple as "God said SO" might have at least stirred within many today early on? Instead of it being the type of moment when what had seemed like an endless flow of words or word pictures which simply dried up like the some dead lake or sea?

Who's to say how anything will turn OUT if the right things HAD OF been said in times past? Doesn't opportunity also need to be given a CHANCE encounter in terms of the Birthing of something within us all that may have NOT found the opportunity to speak otherwise?

How exactly does a person speak out of Love to a separate person who rarely Trust? This same lack of Trust also due to what type of Reason? The "reason" leading up an otherwise lengthy explanation maybe? I'm of the opinion the word Reason in its more often accepted usage is FAR too ambiguous.

I'm one of those type thinkers who's of the mindset or "Stronghold" that holds OUT until satisfied with the explanation being offered.

In terms of trust or "Trusting" what someone has said, why the is there ever the need to have to reach back and borrow from the origin of the Greeks? As if in doing so will somehow hopefully "Retrace" the depth of meaning of whatever is being stated (has been said) is also the Gospel? Could you imagine debating with your Mom or Dad or school teacher growing up and trying to reference a Greek, German or Latin Lexicon or "Concordance"? Afterwards to be defined as a HEALTHY debate?

In my youth I would hear people suggesting in many different ways, "Mean what you say and say what you mean"! Sounds easy right, but what if you find yourself surrounded by opposition at nearly every turn having said what you do have to say as if "Meaningful"? The shorter version might be, "Be a man of your word(s)"! The same situations where you've stated your case and  still find yourself at odds with the One you're hoping to Convey a MEANINGFUL message to? Meaning , "Maybe" yet meaningful to who and "Why"?

Soon to discover you'll quite possibly end up lonely using this type of protocol as people today often thought to be good listeners are only listening intently for the sake of their own "Defense" or information that might prove to work out for their own benefit.

But what if the world around us would have YOU to believe YOU are the ONLY one who understands what You're saying? Isn't there some clinical diagnosis and acceptance of same for this condition? Some might even suggest a "Dis-ease" or mental Dis-order"? Maybe the word "Delusional" might seem "Fitting" to some?

What does being Culled Out mean to you? What does being considered the Called Out mean to others of a different persuasion?

If you were asked, "Are cultures or societies designed by way of forethought and planning or more by way of an evolutionary process where a group of people fly by the seat of their britches? Further to suggest an environment that's been "Intentionally" structured by way of having only one of two choices? Those two choices being to either "Accept" or "Reject" specific ideologies?

And if a persons answer were "Yes" to both or "Yes AND No" wouldn't that also qualify an "Ambiguous" response by definition? It would if "Yes and No" were the Only two acceptable responses, right?  And what might a melting Pot of idea's look like to You? Are we also talking about forging metal, Mulligan Stew or the strength and the combined strength of ALL that a person believes to be simultaneously TRUE?

Have you ever listened intently to or "Felt" the energy in the room when someone is considered being "Grilled" (Cross examined or Crucified) in a court of Law? What would you consider as the appropriate metaphor in terms of the source of heat? The anticipation of the hearers who are waiting to hear and judge for themselves what is True or Not? What about the visual affect of a word picture of someone being thrown into the Lions Den of Public Opinion?

Think of a Jury that's been pooled? What would you "Predict" the verdict would be if a murder trial jury had been pooled from a panel of nothing but "Convicted Murders" waiting on death row?

Much like what I call the cowards way out of a complicated conversation whenever a fruitless exercise reaches their conclusion by way of 'Agreeing" to "Disagree"? Some might suggest "Well at least they Tried", yet in my view the more accurate assessment would read, "Yes, you too were Tried, but you were also found guilty having failed at the task at hand!

How many have read or heard, "Love never fails"? Are those simple words to be considered false? What about the minds that try to "Interpret" them as God intended within any God Given moment?

In terms of ALL that a person also believes God to be, would Him being Truthful in every matter be at the Top of the lengthy list that might attempt to somehow express all that God is?

Exactly how does a person describe their home town as a fallen city to its inhabitants while trying not to blend in with the drunken crowd. sw

What comes to mind when you hear the word "Infrastructure"? I would like to think "Images" such as Roads, Water Systems, Electrical grids, Government buildings, Railways and Airports etc. All the above are tangible, things built with human hands which were intended at their "Introduction" to somehow serve the common "Good", right?

Basically once their practicality and day to day usefulness has been realized over the course of time these things seem to develop the tendency to somehow "Fade" into the background in the nearly blinding light of everything else that comes along as if New and Improved.

If Jesus were seen as in a New and Improved light today, what would that Light also look like as compared? In terms of applied proper context why would a reader of the passage below need the entire scenario somehow be "Recreated" before they 'Understood" the essence (heart) of what the author is suggesting? What if the one reading were to simply first "Answer the questions he's asking to then accept the response at"Face Value"?

Why do many criminals get away with crimes beyond being Tried? Because of the lack of Evidence? Or because no WITNESS can truly testify to the Crime because THEY weren't PHYSICALLY there meaning "Present"?

1 Cor 9:3-12
This is my defense to those who sit in judgment on me. 4 Don't we have the right to food and drink? Don't we have the right to take a believing wife along with us, as do the other apostles and the Lord's brothers and Cephas? Or is it only I and Barnabas who must work for a living? 

Who serves as a soldier at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard and does not eat of its grapes? Who tends a flock and does not drink of the milk? 8 Do I say this merely from a human point of view ? Doesn't the Law say the same thing? 

For it is written in the Law of Moses: "Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain." Is it about oxen that God is concerned? 

Surely he says this for us, doesn't he? Yes, this was written for us, because when the plowman plows and the thresher threshes, they ought to do so in the hope of sharing in the harvest. If we have sown spiritual seed among you, is it too much if we reap a material harvest from you? 12 If others have this right of support from you, shouldn't we have it all the more? 
NIV

Have you ever allowed your self to be questioned at Length about "Any" talking point to the point of fatigue?  How about questions about God or the One God sent to mankind with a specific and intentional message? To then add to that thought a message sent that is far "Beyond Questioning"? Especially when considering exactly who it is that's being asked the question?

Have you ever heard the phrase used when a topic has been "Talked to Death"? To further suggest a Dead Topic"? Wouldn't it also be interesting to reach an "Absolute" understanding as to why anyone would NOT enjoy talking to other people? Especially if you like myself are the type who chooses to believe there is a "Reason" for everything as if simultaneously discussing different "Seasons"?

What if and whenever the spirit of God were Truly being discussed, someone told you there are "Seasons" of God? One of those seasons being the season of His "Mercy"? Is there a difference between the two without "Outside" input?

People will more often talk more about whatever it is they have a direct "Interest" in, right? Would it also be a safe assumption to consider what most people are NOT interested in Talking about are topics that easily "Stir Up" mixed emotions?

Have you ever considered mixed emotions as you might a strong mixed 'Drink"? I suppose if there are those who have been more wonderfully saved than others, but what if talking about mixed drink the person you're talking to had NEVER been drunk? Never tasted or even smelled Alcohol or other mind altering substances?

Would this make and/or qualify them as if closed minded or simply someone thought to have made NOTHING but "Good" decisions to date?

I remember having a conversation with a wise man about people in general terms. As do most people we did the dance with words until the conversation reached a certain "Pitch". I could tell he wanted to divert the conversation.

He tried by stating, "I Love people and I Love conversing, yet there are three type of personalities I will NOT debate anything meaningful with and in no particular order they would be Preachers, Politicians, Policeman or Painters.

I was a little taken back at first because this brush stroke seemed a little broad and had a slightly rebellious tone in terms of my understanding of authority. The one personality mentioned that struck me as odd was the Painter. I told this man I can kind of understand the first 3 in terms of making a connection, but why the "Painter"?

He paused and said with an odd grin, "Honestly, it's very simple because every painter I've "Personally" had dealings with at the "End" of the day turned out to be a "Drunk"!

I then asked Him why he thought ALL painters were drunks? He said "Well I don't, but what I do know is that until I meet one that's not, why should I doubt "My" theory"!

I leave you to decide what an "Open Ended" conversation sounds like and how same might somehow affect others with this one question, 'Why does anyone "Need" closure if they're truly always searching for the Truth with all of their heart mind soul and strength?

Hab 2:12-16
Woe to him who builds a city with bloodshed and establishes a town by crime!
Has not the LORD Almighty determined that the people's labor is only fuel for the fire,
that the nations exhaust themselves for nothing?
14 For the earth will be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the LORD,
as the waters cover the sea.

"Woe to him who gives drink to his neighbors, pouring it from the wineskin till they are drunk,
so that he can gaze on their naked bodies. You will be filled with shame instead of glory. Now it is your turn! Drink and be exposed!

The cup from the LORD's right hand is coming around to you,
and disgrace will cover your glory. NIV

sw

Taking the Lead

For what its worth I met up with a new word recently, "Illocutionary". Not only that but according to those who assume they make the rules for interpretation there are several different type actions that are also relative to gaining a better understanding of this particular word and it many applications.

For the sake of "Effectual" communication exactly how satisfied would you consider most people are without added body gesturing whenever they speak? Picture a person with the hands and feet bound trying to convey a specific thought (Image)? What can be said without the complementary use of their eyes, limbs and/or Body? What could also be said without finding one has need of somehow borrowing from something someone else has already supposedly spoken and MADE clear?

That is also to suggest without the need for a "Jury" or PUBLIC opinion weighing In" on the matter in terms of hoping to TIP the scales?

And if a person were trying to consider the voice of God as if  "The" talking "Head" that was also intended to be heard far above "All" others? The type of 'Sounding" source that has no waiving extremities that might otherwise add to or take away from the hearers focus? Simply put what was said that also came from THE Mouth of this HEAD is ALL there is to consider?

As if stripping the pre-fix (word) "Art" from the spelled out enunciation "Articulate"?  Having done so what exactly remains? Do these type of words or sounds have any stand alone value in Modern day English language? What about the difference between Abram and Abra-ham?

Is it 'Speech" alone or the "Ability" to speak that is truly a type of ART? What of the claim to fame that suggest a Creator of ALL things who simply SPOKE things into their varied states of (manifestation) Existence? Wouldn't it depend on what an "Individual" is capable of accomplishing in terms of being the One who's at the "Helm" in the proverbial "Wheel House"?

Have you ever truly traced out the origin of the metaphor in terms of the "Hand" that is also "Writing on the Wall"? Who exactly did such a hand belong to? The hand that pierced the veil of the otherwise unknown (yet to BE realized)? Exactly how would Being the Oldest Version of ANYTHING also PROVE to be the very source of that same thing?

Remember the show "Adams Family"? Exactly who was Adam? Remember cousin "IT"? What about the one (hand) that was named and summoned by way of being called "THING"? Who exactly COULD call them anything different  if they were the originals version of those same things?

The English language is one of the most ambiguous known to man. I can only assume the "Real Reason", yet what would you and I discover without the Greeks of antiquity somehow weighing in as if those who also have the "Final say"? Is there any real hope of conveying what our minds eye can see without finding our type of person having to borrow from an Unknown Source that might have also expired?

What about the more recently adopted acronym "AI" today (Art-ificial Intelligence)? Who used to be our cultures well respected go to source of collected (Collated) wisdom? Especially in terms of the ROOT words societies commonly use in order to Translate idioms, philosophy, Origins and/or theories? Webster's? Britannica? National Geo-graphic or TIME magazine"?

Is Cortona going be the replacement Voice of  "Reason? Is it possible the voice of LOGIC or REASON can TRULY be mapped out?

In biblical terms, who was said to be the Root (vine) and who was said to be the Branches and more importantly WHY? Why is IT some will allow God to explain the Tree and the roots of that same tree in search of nutrients, yet the same individuals will NOT allow that same creator (God) to explain the very NATURE of the 'Mankind"?

Rom 1:19-20
 20 For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse . 
NIV

Who can explain how God who is also Spirit can be in ALL and through ALL and by Him were ALL things created without also considering He spoke same into existence. sw

Not only are there far too many miscommunication this side of mind reading, but in large part due to what? Assumptions, Assertions, misguided Hope and Repetitious acceptance (Traditions) in terms of what we think people are trying to say? Traditional speech that has somehow morphed into a type of "Doctrine" we hear quite often? Heard so OFTEN we begin to believe what we hear because we DO hear same so often?

What if the Label or Name, "Religion" were being used as nothing more than a dis-tractor? The type of distraction that has done nothing more than get in the way of the PERSON better Known as Jesus the CHRIST? As if the ONE who was "Sent of God"? The ONLY faithful messenger who's History is EVERYTHING His NAME says it Is?

sw

Hopefully to be continued 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No one enjoys the company of "Captain" Obvious ALL the time

How difficult is it to honestly "Explain" away anything that took place in the "Past" without first having to justify your own participation. sw 

Whether a person is found to be difficult or different, hows does either justify the net results of their actions to date once meeting face to face with the "Spirit of Truth" that only labors for the benefit of One. sw

If "Words" were truly considered to be a gift from God, how would the value of those words go on to "Prove" their worth. sw

How does a man become bored with anything? That to include gifts from God in the form of a wife that's true and children who anxiously look forward to a life that's been filled with the reward of all that He proved capable of teaching them. sw

In light of the ultimate example, who within a household has the toughest act to follow when opposed at nearly every turn of events. sw

Why is anything considered to be "Over Rated" without first having drawn a comparison. sw

Just think of what was lost by way of a son who was willing to trade his inheritance for a bowl of stew or a few moments of sexual gratification that's expected to last a life time. sw

There is a gift that can ruin the man who has not been taught how or why he should "Receive" the lasting benefits of same. sw

The fastest way for a man to not only scorn a woman, but also script a large portion of his future is to treat her as if some "Thing" that can be easily replaced and forgotten. sw

There's an Ugly rumor making its rounds that suggest children should be seen and NOT heard. Wisdom might suggest otherwise not only the importance of what comes from the Mouths of Babes but the type of spirit that can see the true value of same in the very moments it has chosen to escape their lips. sw

Could the real reason for the odd number senses be there's never a tie once he's truly allowed all 5 to weigh in and truly "Evaluate" a matter. sw

At what "Point" is the direction of a man confused by way of a Tie Vote aimlessly cast. sw

What type of man is able to discern the difference between the "Smell" of Life and Death having truly heard someone speak. sw

The one thing mankind to date has NOT proved capable factoring in his measurement of time is the required commitment to same. Instead he's finds comfort in the process of elimination. sw

It's not hard to find a lost soul. Look for the man whose lost his farm, family and friends whose future hope was centered all the above. sw

If what every man is looking for were to be found between two book Ends, shouldn't he be more concerned with what happens within the pages of those two books that were written with Him in the mind of the author. sw

If the apple of a mans eye is only but a reflection of something that was able to momentarily capture his attention, how soon will he become distracted and see things differently. sw

Never taking your eyes off the Prize of Christ will prove be more than a forest full of fruit bearing Trees. sw

The hoarders of this world collect things whose value is never to be realized. sw

There's more to "Denial" than refusing to meet harmoniously with the 5 natural senses. sw

When Gender gets in the way, truly what has it hindered. sw


Rom 1:18-20
The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. 

NIV

Government Issue (Part 2)

What is to suggest God is in "CONTROL"? To also consider this same God who tells mankind repeatedly throughout each generation there is nothing NEW under the Sun? The same God who makes mention of His own person as the One  Who also does NOT change?

Could such a claim also suggest a sense of awareness that has achieved 'Absolute Spiritual Maturity"? Many are claiming to Know what Love is, yet how many have fallen short in their failure to "Come" to God so that they might "Know" Him and the One He has sent more completely each and every second God chooses to add to their present state of existence? That to include however else such an existence has not only manifested, but also allowed for a righteous explanation of same?

1 John 4:8-10
Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love . This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him.
NIV

Truly what is it to declare, claim and accept being "Imperfect"? What if Moses refused to Climb the Mountain? What if Jesus refused to climb to the top of the trash heap strategically situated outside the city? What if the Apostle Paul refused to be made a new man after being made blind? WHat if many others refused to GO whenever they heard the words from they believed to be from God that TOLD them to GO?

Does this question only have authority over those who "Do Believe" not only that God exist, but also that God is Right All the Time? When the Son of God was considered a visitor here on earth also as a child in body and in the spirit of His mind, did he also KNOW everything he would also "eventually" have need of knowing upon His entry into this world?

Nothing to gain or expound upon as if discussing every aspect of his being? The word of God suggest that He "Grew" in many ways, so if there is no room for growth what might this also suggest?

Have you ever considered why devout believer's who not only claim to be In Christ, but Christ also in them also have need of claiming and holding onto their claim of being "Imperfect"? Many today understand DNA in one fashion, yet they'll also consistently insist upon having zero to very little regard along the lines of what they believe spiritually that also might express some degree of Christ who is Living within their God given collective sense of representation.

Have you ever wondered what is in play when a child who has One white parent and One black parent who then supposedly "Grows Up"? Some ONE who supposedly grows up and grows more affectionate towards the bias of one ethnic group above and beyond the other? Having also somehow and some "Way" become convinced they've also made a 'Clear" and "Conscious" choice in doing so?

John 6:63-64
The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life. Yet there are some of you who do not believe.
NIV

Under the clear (Transparent) terms of what God considers to have been MADE in His likeness, how important do His words play OUT Their assigned role as to what the flesh also holds in store for those who believe in Him?

What happens to any person whenever the flesh takes over and becomes WHO a person is verse WHERE a person is temporarily Located? As if talking ONLY about an address? Exactly how would you attempt to SERIOUSLY sit and reason with a persons once you're convinced there's "No One at Home"?

It's easy for some super charged spiritualist to suggest where ever there body is there they are Too, yet who has NOT become convinced of the promise that wherever Christ Is there you are also?

What if "Unbelief" were a considered a Place or maybe more accurately stated as an ADDRESS? What if "Maturation" were thought of as a change of Address?

Have you ever tried to compel someone they need to make a change, yet every tactic or approach you've been met with the "Unwilling Gate Keeper" or "Door Man"who refuses to let you in for whatever reason?

I invite you to read the following as a believer. When you read also consider what many refuse to let go of in terms of their undeniable NEED to never forget their IMPERFECTION they insist upon also being the Proud Owner of same?

Many claim that perfection has come in the form of Gods word. If this is the eaxct same perfection God says it is, why aren't men claiming to have been made "Perfect? Clearly what exactly do the words of God say will happen when perfection comes? What do Gods words say will happen to "Imperfection"? Does Imperfection"remain"? Is perfection in WHOLE or in PART? Does it go away for a while and then Come back?

When only God is True and every man is held up to the candle light that determines "Imperfection" what does God say happens to Imperfection? It "Disappears"!

If this is True what then SHOULD this also suggest in terms of ALL else that is still needed today God originally gave to the Body of Christ? Given of God for the sake of what TYPE of reasoning? In order for this assessment to be fulfilled as if a TRUE prophecy of God that will come to PASS?

Has Prophecy failed? Wouldn't that also depend upon who's speaking TODAY? I would suspect the prophesies of men have failed, yet NOT the words of God He also testifies to are also His Spirit? When a man says Today, is this the same "Today" that is also the same DAY God is speaking of Prophetically? As if those doing the speaking are also speaking the Oracles spoken of God?

Have tongues been stilled? Have the tongues that should be speaking what God is still saying to mankind been stilled? Obviously there are still MANY wagging tongues saying many DIFFERENT things as though God spoke same? Who's lying and who's speaking the Truth in terms of ALL that Love declares HE is if Imperfection truly does DISAPPEAR upon the mere arrival of What God says is Prefect?

Truly WHAT and/or WHO have You believed? What do You believe has also Failed? Especially when you suggest You also Believe that God is LOVE?

Is the word of God only a Mirror or is it His spirit speaking what men have need of "Knowing" in our poor attempts at remaining "Mindful" of ALL that He is in His otherwise understood "Physical" absence?

1 Cor 13:8-12
Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when perfection comes, the imperfect disappears.

When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child , I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me. Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.
NIV

Does it matter who says what or how if this person is only searching for ALL that is "True"~ sw

Why is it that only preachers are assumed to be the teachers of this world? The same ones who are convinced they too Know what foolishness sounds like in the ears of the "Hearer". sw

If retaining the right to choose who and what to believe also directly affected life outcome, who then also chose wisely. sw

In terms of who the Fathers, Patriarchs or Parental figure's are as if the witness of ones specific Faith, who then has lead "Way" the Christ said He followed while also expressing and claiming to be the One who's "In Control". sw

 Deut 30:19-20
This day I call heaven and earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death , blessings and curses. Now choose life , so that you and your children may live and that you may love the LORD your God, listen to his voice, and hold fast to him. For the LORD is your life, and he will give you many years in the land he swore to give to your fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
NIV

1 Cor 1:21-22
For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him, God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe. NIV

What are the rebels of "This World" truly in control of this time or ANY time. sw


Matt 12:35-37
A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.

But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.

For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.

KJV

John 14:15-21
"If you love me , you will obey what I command. 16 And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Counselor to be with you forever- the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him. But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you. I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you. Before long, the world will not see me anymore, but you will see me. Because I live, you also will live. On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you. Whoever has my commands and obeys them, he is the one who loves me. He who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I too will love him and show myself to him."  
NIV

Have you ever stopped to consider exactly who it is that's helping You determine the true character of God? And if you did "Stop" what exactly did you have to "Stop" doing so you could "Honestly Reconsider"?

The true character and nature of God as if same has been lost in the midst of mass numbers who are not only trying to chose  who to believe, but who they should continually "Follow" beyond that initial point? Individuals" who are choosing who they are to follow yet based on what if not "Who theses leaders insist they TOO are following"? And when something does happen that wass intended of God to prove someone is NOT Following Christ, who then do the said follower turn to if NOT back to the same type individuals or someone just "Like" them?

Rom 15:5-6
May the God who gives endurance and encouragement give you a spirit of unity among yourselves as you follow Christ Jesus, so that with one heart and mouth you may glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.
NIV

Who they say they are usually evidenced by way of somehow trying to disprove certain character qualities only God is capable of validating or NOT?

Wait a minute I THOUGHT God said He so loved the WORLD? The same world He gave His one and Only son to "Die For"? What happens when a person truly takes inventory of their chosen words spoken?

James 4:4-6
Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God. Or do you think Scripture says without reason that the spirit he caused to live in us envies intensely? But he gives us more grace. That is why Scripture says:

"God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble." 
NIV

Is there any danger in quoting bible scripture all the time? Quoting scripture as if exactly what to do in the moment has been recorded verbatim?

Have you ever sat and deeply considered for more than a couple of minutes what being "In Agreement" walks and talks like in the presence of God? As if NO WHERE truly does NOT exist in the full scope of of ALL that God is also aware of?

If this were true, how then would you find the words that are said to be from the heart and mouth of God in that "Anything that is NOT of faith is to be considered as Sin"?

If someone were to ask You in the middle of You offering them Your personal Testimony about The God and creator of ALL mankind, "What exactly do You Believe to be true about Your God? To then consider how most people have been trained to think before speaking about the dynamics and potential power of "Projection"?

I found this brief on Wiki and it seemed relative to my own understanding of whenever someone is considered to be "Projecting" themselves upon another person. Some might even suggest this same practice as "Judging" others?

It means that, rather than picking up on how you actually are feeling, the other party prematurely assumes to understand how you're feeling, based on their own machinations. It usually indicates that someone is self-absorbed for the moment, if someone is projecting their feelings onto you.

Have you ever stopped to "Reconsider" what was trying to take up residency in the minds of those who were confronting Jesus whenever he spoke of or about God? As if speaking on Gods behalf and/or in Gods "Stead"?

Did Jesus "Ever" take a break, vacation or "Punch" out on the divine "Time" clock while here?

John 5:18
For this reason the Jews tried all the harder to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God. NIV

Was Jesus projecting His person on God OR these particular men? Was Jesus Judging them by way of what He was doing? Some might ask "How is anyone to know"? What if believers were to "Allow" God to be true in ALL that He does say?

In terms of a righteous question asked, "Is there a true difference between Judging and making a decision "About" someone, a specific set of circumstances or "Scenario"? As if talking about a "Scene" taken or borrowed from a "Movie'?

John 8:15-18
You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one. But if I do judge , my decisions are right, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me. In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid. I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me."  
NIV

What happens to the persona of Christ should He only be seen from the perspective of this world? And if the same question were being asked of you, how would YOU respond while claiming the spirit of Christ within You while also denying having been Made Perfect by way of His spirit?

Is it all (True Life) ONLY a matter of knowing certain or factual considerations or NOT or would true life be more accurately expressed by way of truly Knowing the Person of God? In terms of the "Right Answer" would You find yourself in agreement if true life were ONLY God who is the ONLY one who has the capacity and authority to answer such a question?

Many today seem to base their opinion of authority on whether or Not there's any other way around a matter or not. What do you have to say as if You are In control of what Your Mind suggest?

Is there a difference between Knowing and Truly "Believing" what God has said the WAY God defines both? Is faith only based on what you Know or who it is that also proves they "Know You"?

sw

Substance "Abuse"

Why is Fear of doing what is Good in the eyes of God NOT being called out for all that it truly is?

Is fear to be considered a sinful trait whenever God has informed otherwise?

What has a person suggested whenever they try to convey they "ARE" powerless? They didn't "Know" any better? They never Knew because No One has ever told or taught them any differently? Because they have "Nothing" to compare a "Lively" matter to?

How does a man somehow disqualify himself from a Prize"? Having failed to recognize and/or acknowledge God as not only the creator of ALL things, but ALL things to include his own "Person"? Even if only a very small portion and representation of ALL that God is here in the earth in any given moment?

Is there anything "Danger" or more that COULD be gleaned from a much higher "Thought life"? The type of Life that might try to RE-consider they are raising a child that does belong to God? Verses trying to raise same as if You or I are the Sole Proprietor instead of temporary Care Takers?

There has to be poor "Reasoning" involved as to WHY very few are not only inquiring WHO'S WHO in this world as well to whom does anyone truly BELONG in REAL TERMS that WILL also prove to be EVERLASTING TERMS?

Rom 1:20
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse .
NIV

Does it look like analysis paralysis or like "Righteous" patience moving forwards that has and continues to remain willing to wait on its "Just" reward?

Dan 7:1
In the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon, Daniel had a dream, and visions passed through his mind as he was lying on his bed. He wrote down the substance of his dream. NIV

What made Mary so special in the eyes of God? That she bore His Child or that Mary Believed what God said to her personally?

Luke 2:16-20
So they hurried off and found Mary and Joseph, and the baby, who was lying in the manger. 17 When they had seen him, they spread the word concerning what had been told them about this child, and all who heard it were amazed at what the shepherds said to them.

But Mary treasured up all these things and pondered them in her heart . The shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things they had heard and seen, which were just as they had been told.
NIV

Luke 2:33-35
The child's father and mother marveled at what was said about him. 34 Then Simeon blessed them and said to Mary , his mother: "This child is destined to cause the falling and rising of many in Israel, and to be a sign that will be spoken against, so that the thoughts of many hearts will be revealed. And a sword will pierce your own soul too."
NIV

Why does any child avoid being in the presence of their parents after doing something they "Know" will be considered to be shameful? Because they did NOT know?

What type of child who knows they've already "Broken" their curfew who also "Knows" they will be punished (corrected) upon their return doesn't also justify their individual enjoyment of the "Rest" of the Night?

If there is but "One God" why the need for so many different types of "understanding' by the "Same" ones who insist on their individual diversity. sw

What does the word of God suggest by way of taking the time to describe a type of person who is willing to crucify Christ Christ all over again?

How might holding on to what you have been given also prove to "Be" something that's also considered will "Be" substantial in a day that's yet to have come?

What has truly been confessed should someone claim they did NOT know when God says the Holy Spirit HAS testified? And that in the revealing light of what?

Rom 8:12-17
Therefore, brothers, we have an obligation — but it is not to the sinful nature, to live according to it. For if you live according to the sinful nature, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live, because those who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God.

For you did not receive a spirit that makes you a slave again to fear, but you received the Spirit of sonship. And by him we cry, "Abba,  Father."

The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God's children. Now if we are children, then we are heirs — heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory.
NIV

Heb 6:4-6
It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age, if they fall away, to be brought back to repentance, because to their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace.
NIV

Heb 10:11-18
Day after day every priest stands and performs his religious duties; again and again he offers the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God. Since that time he waits for his enemies to be made his footstool, because by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.

The Holy Spirit also testifies to us about this. First he says:

"This is the covenant I will make with them after that time, says the Lord.
I will put my laws in their hearts, and I will write them on their minds." 

Then he adds:

"Their sins and lawless acts I will remember no more." 

And where these have been forgiven, there is no longer any sacrifice for sin.
NIV

Why is it easy to understand the contrast of the before and after picture taken, yet it seems so difficult to hear from a word picture that depicts the same thing in order to somehow protect the innocent. sw

Why would it prove to be difficult to prove someone to be a known liar whose history can not be found. sw

What does it look like to hold onto the claim of Imperfection having been told we've been given the Power to become the Sons of God by way of the authority that was given unto the Christ we suggest we follow. sw

Ezek 24:26-27
At that time your mouth will be opened; you will speak with him and will no longer be silent. So you will be a sign to them, and they will know that I am the LORD." NIV

Which do you prefer to be seen in the eyes of God? To act as though you do have power or confess you are nothing having realized you are without the same power he freely gives as if a sign and direct indication of His true mercy and forgiveness?

Sw

The Role of God

Part of the "Absolute" beauty of an otherwise invisible God is that which suggest a "Complete" role reversal would require a sincere listener who doesn't miss a single thing. sw

 Jer 42:4
"I have heard you ," replied Jeremiah the prophet. "I will certainly pray to the LORD your God as you have requested; I will tell you everything the LORD says and will keep nothing back from you."
NIV

Have you ever contemplated "Why" it is the religious sect of humanity that somehow assumes it knows ALL to well exactly "Why" and "Who" the true prophets of God are? The same ones who will rarely listen to what anyone has to say in terms of hearing the entire matter? Those who are supposedly "Listening" for the specifics in terms of the added benefits and probability of having been visited by a prophet of God?

Can anyone truly attack the person of God in terms of somehow doing Him harm or does a man merely try and assault the words He's spoken only later to "Realize" to his on hurt?

The type of divine gesture that also suggest what should God choose to speak to "Any" person mouth to ear?

Have you ever studied the faces of those type of people were they to hear you suggest aloud, "God Told Me'?

In terms of what is truly said and Heard, what exactly is the depth of the claim and response of "Christ In You"? And if Jesus said every thing he did, wanted and/or needed to say during his physical visitation, who today could in any fashion add to, compliment or somehow take away from same?

Have you ever engaged the 'Why" behind the message of someone who's considered to 'Be" a practicing "Politician"? The type who are always sending out messages they would love nothing more than to see their message to have become 'Effectual"? Effectual maybe, yet why is any type of message considered not only to be effectual without also considering the likeness of the messenger?

(As merely a side note, and under the terms of true leadership, what would You suggest would change on a truly LEVEL playing field if a politician was mandated to subject their person and their entire household to the exact same laws, resulting benefits whether health care or retirement they suggested they were going to fight for and implement?)

Why is it the said "Hearer" always seems to get to decide what's best? At what point does the one speaking somehow influence what gets 'Heard"? I think it true we all learn at an early age how to defend against hearing Bad Information in term of putting to Good use said "Logic", yet what happens whenever 'Bad Information" is used when teaching and training ones Logical approach to the things said Life presents?

Why can't the words of God be weighed in the same fashion? Maybe they are? What exactly would you consider to be the "Effectual Communication" of ones faith? That is to say as compared to the type message that "Promises" to deliver "Specific's" verses "Vague" or hard to "Understand" plans that may or may "Not" include the hearer?

Where's the measurement of ANY promise that's been "Made"? As such without also considering the type of person who also decides the fate of  another's "Disappointment"?

You and I can sit and debate what Faith is all day, yet what happens if the type of Faith Jesus wants to see when He returns were to reflect poorly on either of our own definition(s)? As if somehow opposed to what Jesus says the True potential of  (Net Results) of a heavenly defined "Faith" will also "Produce"? 

How many believers in what God has said are willing to wait?

And should the need arise, continue to wait for the "Appearance" (manifestation) of Gods power and authority? Especially if the person in "Question" has no 'Earthly" idea not only what God does NOT look like and as such namely because that same God has declared that He Is Spirit?

John 4:23-24
(Jesus Declared)...... God is spirit , and his worshipers must worship in spirit and in truth." 
NIV

That being said and heard as if Believable, who then can truly remain a Hold Out (Called Out) as to whether or not God is steadfast and remains "Willing" to act/perform Spiritually on behalf of anyone? Without also adding acting on their behalf in "This World" and in a Positive fashion?

The type of power and authority that manifest and transcends in an ever increasing measure, all doubt and unbelief? The same type of power that not only appears as His Power (Grace) as well why He as God decides however he does about anything? The type of response which also reflects upon "The Lords good, pleasing and perfect Will"?

That said, only if you truly do "Care enough to at least "Want to Know" what pleases Him as if He As Lord and Your Christ is Real to You?

Especially when considering the Golden rule that also agree's with Wisdom from God that speaks about a type of divine married man (spiritual) who Loves his wife in part because he has, does and continues willingly to learn how and why to love himself?

Eph 5:10-11
........ and find out what pleases the Lord. NIV

Rom 12:2
Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is — his good, pleasing and perfect will. 
NIV

If God is truly in control over everything, why would anyone ever complain about anything? That is to also suggest talking primarily "To" and about "Those" who also suggest they "Believe In God"?

Why would the said leaders of Gods church in the earth have need of somehow being tasked with somehow convincing Gods people also in the earth they can't 'Know" Gods "Will" with any REAL specificity?

John 17:3
Now this is eternal life : that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. NIV

What good does it profit a man to somehow exhibit what is "Right" if the other mans imperfection keeps getting in the WAY of somehow replicating what is "Right"? At what point does the child of "Wisdom" go on to prove that True wisdom in any situation is always the Right Choice?

Is God only thought to BE a Poetic novelist?

If God is Spirit and it is ONLY His children can truly worship His person in Spirit and In Truth, why all the fuss about who's who in this world while arguing about the activities that are also taking place in another realm namely 'Heaven"?

The very prayers offered to this same God of Heaven sent from an address here on earth that verbally suggest His Will Be done on earth as it is In Heaven?

Rev 2:20-23
Nevertheless, I have this against you: You tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess. By her teaching she misleads my servants  into sexual immorality and the eating of food sacrificed to idols. I have given her time to repent of her immorality, but she is unwilling. So I will cast her on a bed of suffering, and I will make those who commit adultery with her suffer intensely, unless they repent of her ways. I will strike her children dead. Then all the churches will know that I am he who searches hearts and minds, and I will repay each of you according to your deeds.
NIV

What if a man did know what caused God to act in a said "Negative or Positive" fashion while also claiming man does not and is incapable of knowing Gods Will in ANY type of God provided scenario?

Exactly why is anything a man can "SAY" is then considered to be somehow be different than when God has said the same things? What exactly is it about mankind that can somehow SPOIL those same spoken words? Exactly how may sides of a veil are there? As if in comparison to the type and reason for wearing a veil as did Moses when descending down the mountain from the presents of God into the midst of Gods chosen people?

1 Tim 3:14-16

Although I hope to come to you soon, I am writing you these instructions so that, if I am delayed, you will know how people ought to conduct themselves in God's household, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth. Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great: 

He appeared in a body, was vindicated by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was preached among the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory. 

NIV

Not everyone believes God do they? Not everyone has seen God have they? Not everyone has Heard from God have they? Not everyone will be taken up into the presence of His Glory AND remain there will they?

In terms of what every "One" chooses to believe to be True about God, how has the "Trial and Errors" of this methodology served most to date? A type process which also suggest what if not the swing and miss approach? Does God throw nothing but fast balls?

All the above while claiming to understand or NOT that "Anything that does not come from Faith is Sin"? And if Sin, who is NOT repenting having recognized Sin for all that God says the nature of Sin commits itself to do? As if to suggest a type of Fruit which may or may NOT have been produced or thought wise to consume in the Light of the Truth?

How fitting TODAY would some find the critical words of Christ spoken back then? As if everything God had said was also pointing directly towards the same Christ and representative God eventually sent?

Mark 12:24
Jesus replied, "Are you not in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God ? NIV

Is there a deeper meaning for some when the consideration of rising from the dead goes far beyond the events only their physical bodies endure? What happens when a person allows their minds to be convinced their physical bodies somehow "Cloak" the combined sense of awareness of their spirit and soul?

At what point does the votes cast by the body somehow outweigh the combined determination of the spirit and soul? A two to one vote (elect) cast which then suggest the body should otherwise also do what? Only then to witness the body do just the opposite of what the spirit and soul KNOW what NOT to do?

Where exactly can the sinful nature be found when its something understood to be some mysterious consideration within a person? Especially whenever someone is truthfully looking for same as though a 'Sinful" consideration that has need of being put to death?

At what point do the words of God bring not only the needed sword in order to put same to death but also in terms of obedience help bring to pass the sense of 'Divine" division within a man (Person)? The type division that is capable of dividing spirit and soul? Bone from its marrow and connecting tissue(s)? Quite the word picture in my mind!

Whenever something is considered to be functioning in "Stealth Mode" what does this suggest?

Eph 5:8-14
For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) and find out what pleases the Lord.

Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. For it is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret. But everything exposed by the light becomes visible, for it is light that makes everything visible. This is why it is said:

"Wake up, O sleeper, rise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you."
NIV

These same ones who have need of remaining vague in their assessment of God as those who also suggest that only Time will tell the truth? All the above while forgetting where it has been said of God exactly where the Power of God resides as well where it doesn't and why?

Have you ever been ask did Jesus do ANYTHING differently than did God? The same God whom also says the beloved of God should also DO likewise? What is a lose-lose situation if asked to do or accomplish something that's also "Impossible? And what if all that is considered to 'Be" the impossible is Everything that God was NOT a party to same?

If NOT, why Not? If ANYTHING is to be considered the IMPOSSIBLE without God and more likely to be described as the miraculous, who then can claim anything less than all the above is TRUE?

Many are familiar with the term the "Buck Stops Here" yet who's not asking where does God begin or end to include all that He as God is WILLING to do?

How did Jesus so decisively and quickly assess the will of God in ANY given moment?

John 7:17
If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine , whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself. KJV

Mark 12:24
Jesus replied, "Are you not in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God ? NIV

Rom 1:16-17
I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. For in the gospel a righteousness from God is revealed, a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written: "The righteous will live by faith."
NIV

Is God the father of Time alone or the Father of His children? The first of those beloved being "Who" if not "The Christ" who God also "Sent" to those He loves?

All the above having been framed by the sin filled type of thoughts that have a history of conveying that God intended to remain One BIG mystery to those He says he loves?

The truth that was sent having very little to do with what? The appearance or credentials of the messenger? When the bible is allowed to speak, how often do the stories recorded there are also allowed to govern what God given discernment looks like in REAL TIME? I'll provide an example of not only authority but what happens when the God sourced discernment becomes "Applicable".

2 Sam 1:14-19

David asked him, "Why were you not afraid to lift your hand to destroy the LORD's anointed?" 

15 Then David called one of his men and said, "Go, strike him down!" So he struck him down, and he died. For David had said to him, "Your blood be on your own head. Your own mouth testified against you when you said, 'I killed the LORD's anointed.'" 

17 David took up this lament concerning Saul and his son Jonathan, 18 and ordered that the men of Judah be taught this lament of the bow (it is written in the Book of Jashar): 

"Your glory, O Israel, lies slain on your heights. How the mighty have fallen! NIV

Have you ever deeply considered what is being suggested when someone advises you, "Think it through"? How can someone think anything "Through" as if its true "Finality" unless it is possible to somehow see the "End" benefit of having done so? 

And if someone is incapable of  thinking a matter "Through" or thoroughly, how can the type of "hope" that is also true somehow find a "Way" to rescue them from making a bad decision? The net results which also prove a bad decision that will only manifest in the said "Future" tense?

Truly what is the essence within any given moment that's also clearly understood to be "Intense" in terms of what a person fears "Most" in their Life?  How might the fear of the Lord help someone also make a Good decision? Especially while claiming to understand not that ONLY God is Good all the time, but also the Beginning of "wisdom" is the "Fear of the Lord"?

Without knowing beyond doubt what the exact cause was in KING David having this young man Struck down by the sword, whom also stands in the face of the same 'Risk" by way of giving a bad testimony to the King?

Today we as believers have a great privilege as those whom God recognizes as those who do know the truth beyond doubt because we also know why we also believe what was recorded elsewhere in SAME bible which speaks the truth about what took place at the death of Saul.

That said, how Important might it prove to know beyond doubt whether or NOT David as King during his own tenure here on earth also enjoyed true reward as a Prophet of God? Will your answer only depend upon what you've been told or what you think you need a prophet to look like today before accepting a prophet ONLY because they are a prophet Of God?

Exactly how does TIME or the contents of Time ever get taken out of Context? Especially so when Time is also considered to be the ONLY type of father many are willing to Believe?

God is spirit and unless you Too are also willing to acknowledge what any spirit within you also looks and acts like, how WILL anyone ever come to know who their true Father is or NOT?

Acts 2:29-31

"Brothers, I can tell you confidently that the patriarch David died and was buried, and his tomb is here to this day. But he was a prophet and knew that God had promised him on oath that he would place one of his descendants on his throne. Seeing what was ahead, he spoke of the resurrection of the Christ, that he was not abandoned to the grave, nor did his body see decay.

NIV

Would ANY one who's also NOT an enemy OF GOD have even gone to WAR against the "Anointed" of the One True God namely "Saul" if they also feared that God seated him (Saul) as King for whatever reason?

How many believers today who claim Christ in them truly KNOW what they "Believe" without also knowing what qualifies who the enemies of God look and act like while coexisting in the future Tense as compared?

1 Sam 31:4-6

Saul said to his armor-bearer, "Draw your sword and run me through, or these uncircumcised fellows will come and run me through and abuse me." 

But his armor-bearer was terrified and would not do it; so Saul took his own sword and fell on it.  When the armor-bearer saw that Saul was dead, he too fell on his sword and died with him. So Saul and his three sons and his armor-bearer and all his men died together that same day. 

NIV

1 Chron 10:2-6

The fighting grew fierce around Saul, and when the archers overtook him, they wounded him. 

Saul said to his armor-bearer, "Draw your sword and run me through, or these uncircumcised fellows will come and abuse me." 

But his armor-bearer was terrified and would not do it; so Saul took his own sword and fell on it.  When the armor-bearer saw that Saul was dead, he too fell on his sword and died. So Saul and his three sons died, and all his house died together. 

NIV

My personal belief system revolves around the instructions given of God which suggest it is the TRUTH that sets men free and not the messenger or what anyone thinks about an otherwise "Innocent" messenger who feels compelled to prove his SELF. That is until the messenger has been proved not having been SENT of God. More often merely by hearing their testimony as if God hears EVERY word whether idly spoken in jest or as if from the Mouth of God.

Does it truly matter exactly how OLD or antiquated the words of God might SEEM to an Individual or more importantly how naive youth can be while assuming being Old somehow does away what is still relevant and applicable today?

What is the difference between a messenger of God and someone who is only claiming to have been sent of God? The same could be asked of someone claiming to be an Apostle, Pastor, Teacher, Evangelist or Prophet? Even more as if today the church needs the lessor of anything God originally provided to the church for her strengthening in light of the "Present" condition of a said Bride who's had thousands of years while waiting in the beautiful HOPE of the entire sanctification Process appointed unto the Body Of Christ that is also ONE?

In terms of the acceptance of spoken words and words spoken that are said to be "Of God" exactly who is it today that is deciding as if for themselves in THIS WORLD whenever God is speaking? Not only speaking but how what has been said as if from God then gets "Interpreted"?

At times I poke fun at my wife about her being what I call a "Whisperer". Often without invite, she's somehow become convinced she can interpret (as if beyond doubt in her mind) what our dog is suggesting by way of its bark and behavior. In recent years she has since gone on to get her Masters degree in "Child Whispering".

The brunt of the joke being "WHY" it is that she can claims she does know that I clearly have ears that can hear the same noise she does , yet my personal understanding of what "I hear" also requires her "additional" narrative being HEARD. I asked her not tool long ago should I consider myself dead when she starts speaking for me too AFTER I speak my peace~ sw

Government Issue (Part 1)

If you've observed a "Struggle" between two opposing forces, what should also become evident as if the direct results of a True Struggle. sw

When a person chooses to believe that God has personally made a 'Way" for them in this world, what could prevent freedom to "Act" and "Speak" as if He did from finding its way into the hearts of many? As if defining more than a momentary reflection of what was only heard heard at some "Point" as though "Undeniably" True?

Today as if somehow trying to stay in control of an overshadowing "Narrative" exactly "What' are many "Choosing" to believe at the risk of allowing anything and everything else also gaining entry? Much like living on a farm and opening the door to let the cat back inside to then realize ALL the farm animals somehow mysteriously got in with the Cat?

Whenever there is more than One voice of authority also being heard (having been allowed inside), how soon will the lasting results of compromise begin to erode away at "House" rules? Ho long before doubt and the various affects of unbelief "Become" the short term affect(s) of a "Long Term" self fulfilling prophecy?

The type prophecy that comes to an unexpected "End" yet based on what type of reasoning? The type of reasoning established by way of a false sense of authority that wasn't intended to last? All the above while Knowing and trusting that what God establishes the mankind can somehow thwart or alter even to his own hurt while insisting on the "Belief" and totality of all that "Free Will" then proves differently as if the result(s) of same?

Many say they "Believe" in Free Will, yet whaty does beleieving in "Anything" also hopefully accomplish? Do these same ones also believe in the adverse affects that come by way of the decisions made by the "Mankind"? And when I suggest the "Mankind" decisions made is to also insist decisions made that were void of the Spirit and subjective authority of God?

Isa 9:7
Of the increase of his government and peace there will be no end. He will reign on David's throne and over his kingdom, establishing and upholding it with justice and righteousness from that time on and forever. The zeal of the LORD Almighty will accomplish this.
NIV

And if an "Unexpected" end, truly what type of a prophecy that was also of God was heard by the supposed "Believers" that also suggest Jesus is Lord who do belong to God? Meaning prophetic words from the Mouth of God or one of his duly appointed messengers? What exactly is the difference between words said to have come form the mouth of God and words that do NOT agree with what God has promised? Who gets to decide this side of the "Lack of evidence" that also proved to be self "Sufficient"?

The type of evidence God will Not allow to be presented in the courtroom which He also presides over?

Who at some point in time gets to decide what TRUE Faith is that somehow moves God or Not? Especially while fully understanding what is intended when it has been honestly heard "Without Faith it is Impossible to Please God"? What happens whenever men alone also define depth, meaning and value words do have and hold?

Does God 'Choose" to listen because some whine and complain OR because they are consistent, determined, and are being sanctified by way of perseverance and long suffering? Does God cave or give in because many have learned from there brethren how to effectively whine? Have learned how to produce such a perfected and annoying tone as if to suggest one that No one can resist?

In terms of authority, what's the difference between mere people who suggest that you "Pray and Not give Up" as if somehow different WHENEVER Jesus says the same thing thousands of years ago? Who is truly being BLAMED for WHAT today and maybe more importantly WHY in terms of answered Prayer(s)? The type of Prayers that are also Justified within the divine boundaries of the promises and WILL of God?

What exactly is the difference between something Jesus said a believer in Him is to DO and a supposed Promise Jesus has made being delivered thousands of years later? And if the results of either require the Power of God showing up (Manifesting), what then does anyone conclude at the end of the proverbial Day?

How many by default NEED God and his Character to remain a mystery in order that their theories about God will somehow hold up under close examination?

How do you read, hear and/or "Interpret the following series of words said to be from the mouth God or Inspired By God"? Is the talking point aimed at Justice alone? Faith? The character of God? The sympathy a lowly widow somehow "Deserves"? Try and explain to yourself why what I or ANYONE chooses to believe is also going to somehow affect not only the outcome but what to DO with that same outcome that's also based on what You've chosen to Believe or NOT?

What you alone believe to also suggest 'What" to many others you Hope will choose to become Just Like You? You're still stuck with the dilemma as to what to do while also hoping to move "Forwards" instead of backwards? In either direction based only upon everything you believe to BE True? Without knowing who the proverbial THEY are within any scenario, what GOOD can ever hopefully come from what will also work for all others who do likewise?

Luke 18:1-8:1
Then Jesus told his disciples a parable to show them that they should always pray and not give up.  He said: "In a certain town there was a judge who neither feared God nor cared about men. And there was a widow in that town who kept coming to him with the plea, 'Grant me justice against my adversary.'

"For some time he refused. But finally he said to himself, 'Even though I don't fear God or care about men, yet because this widow keeps bothering me, I will see that she gets justice, so that she won't eventually wear me out with her coming!'"  

And the Lord said, "Listen to what the unjust judge says. And will not God bring about justice for his chosen ones, who cry out to him day and night? Will he keep putting them off? I tell you, he will see that they get justice, and quickly. However, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on the earth?"  NIV

How would you suggest taking something at FACE value should interpret? Could it be that many are NOT seeing the right Face whenever someone comes to them as if by Way of the Authority Christ does Have? Who's to decide if the spirit of authority is to be Taken or Given? Now ask the same question as if in the context of a season of Gods Mercy presently being expressed?

How differently should the EMPTY spoken words of ANYONE in this world be "Treated"? And if words that have become "Emptied', how exactly do any words become empty in light of ALL that God says a True Believer is? Are some intended to be treated differently than others  in a season of Mercy? Whose to say WHY they are with any REAL degree of authority unless MANY also choose to believe? Just because MANY do NOT accept the message of the Cross, doesn't the question still beg to be asked, why Not?

Is it only because God did NOT plead with MANY? Will it prove to be that God accepts different types of excuses? Maybe the type of excuses that might try to suggest someone else is to blame because it was GOD who made EVERYONE so much differently? If leading by example does still hold sway, how then does the thought of Two who have become One hold its own true merit in this world~

sw
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------