It's one consideration to be "Out Spoken", yet who are the "Ones' who are truly speaking "Into" the realized likeliness of God in others". sw
Without truthful consideration as to who it is that also gets to "Enjoy" the 'Last" say, who has truly misrepresented "What' has been said. sw
Why does any type of symbol or image of an original also require an inscription or narrative as if somehow defining same. To then truly have considered who God is in any given moment. sw
Without truthfully considering how many different type of people there are, who is that also decides who those same 'People" also represent? And that without trying to decide what to do with "Who the liars are". sw
What has "War" got to do with "Anything" except for having to deal with the mess that was left on the Table. sw
Is there truly a need for any "Type" of debate in a society that suggest everything is FREE. sw
Under the defining terms of any particular type of culture, why isn't the ONLY question being asked "What Type of growth does any culture hope to Promote". sw
Is there a difference between "Fostering Care" and "Harboring an enemy" and an "Enemy of the State". sw
How far can "freedom of speech" take any nation without a complete understanding of the type of fire that is capable of setting a mans world on fire. sw
Within a democratic society there will always be those who have to painfully endure the decision's the majority has made, yet what happens when the strength of that process gets burned at the 'Stake'. sw
Is a "United" nation truly considered to be a melting pot also the product of the overwhelming will of the people? More so when it's smaller factions find it a need to deal with each other under the table in order to take the "Pot"? sw
Without two separate names as if two separate meanings, truly who are the 'Ones" who've yet to become United. sw
If a man or entity is Free to take what does NOT rightfully belong to either, who's left to bring the thieves to Justice. sw
Who can hear true wisdom speak if everyone in the room is deemed wiser than the others. sw
What good is any type of anger if it's NOT been focused, forged and brought to bear in order to remove the head of the "Cause" of the "Offense"? sw
Preventing the biting the "Hand" that feeds requires what? Knowing to whom the hand is also attached or keeping in mind what an "Insatiable Appetite" is capable of? sw
Tuesday, September 26, 2017
I Am One
In terms of framework I want to begin this particular blog by asking, "Is there a difference between a 'Lawless person" and a 'Godless person"?
In terms of 'Exactly" what it is that maintains any 'Talking Point" who gets to decide if NOT the ONE who initiates the effectual "Discourse" which hopefully follows suit?
God attempts to dispense His 'Wisdom" how? And as such by way of 'WHOM"?
Exactly how 'Potent" will any type of words become whether those that follow below or the type extracted from a "Best Seller"? And how far back does the consideration of "Plagiarism" reach?
To suggest one and the same spirit of God speaking through whomever having become part of His spirited delivery of a type of message that will also "Remain" in the sight of God?
And as such throughout however long divine thoughts of "The Everlasting" realm righteously interprets?
And why in this world does it seem to matter "Who" has spoken as if somehow opposed to 'What" was truthfully spoken? And how has the word "Anointed" also found its dominate voice today?
Many people are saying many things, yet to what "End"?
To then TRUTHFULLY try to consider the possibilities of ALL that 'Outer Darkness" will NOT look like? The type of thoughts that do pertain to this same 'Outer Darkness" having already been Framed by God?
And what is it that's also being presented for consideration whenever the "Fear of the Lord" has been declared as relevant TODAY?
Does the fear of the Lord ONLY find present day relevance because of what the SAME God has SAID is yet to have "Come" (Manifest)?
Where is the specific point/place in a True relationship with the Lord where the Love of God has found opportunity to DO a GOOD work in You or I?
That to mean where the type of Love that ONLY God can reveal does in ALL Truth drive out the 'Fearful Expectation"? The type of thoughts that have Only to do with the coming wrath of God SHOULD have revealed?
Why isn't it being perceived as a compliment as compared to what the words of God do reveal when its heard from Non-believers who suggest, "Christianity is for the WEAK minded'? To then truthfully consider what does make those who are 'Weak".....STRONG and why?
And how can what is yet to come find relevance (home) TODAY in terms of a type of Kingdom this same God has declared is WITHIN those who will believe upon His ONE and only begotten SON?
And exactly where does ones FAITH in what God has said also find its rightful HOME (dwelling place)? The type of consideration that also finds itself in agreement with what? The Christ whom is also In You or I? Yet once more, "Who's to say, Right?
Luke 9:58
Jesus replied, "Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head." NIV
And what do the words of God look like which also have not only BECOME flesh yet even more have since found a "Dwelling" place among men?
The type of words which not only agree with but also could potentially dismiss thoughts which stem from fear? The type of Comforting words He does offer to those who have need of hearing from the lord on OCCASION such as, "Fear not for I have many people in this City"?
Acts 18:9-11
One night the Lord spoke to Paul in a vision: "Do not be afraid; keep on speaking, do not be silent. 10 For I am with you, and no one is going to attack and harm you, because I have many people in this city." 11 So Paul stayed for a year and a half, teaching them the word of God.
NIV
Heb 9:25-28
Nor did he enter heaven to offer himself again and again, the way the high priest enters the Most Holy Place every year with blood that is not his own.
Then Christ would have had to suffer many times since the creation of the world.
But now he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself.
Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment, so Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many people ; and he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him
NIV
Will relevance also PROVE to have been the predominate "Dynamo" in ALL that you have also suggested about your PERSON that has also ONLY been done "Through God"?
And if ONLY by way of God, who's to say what is RIGHT other than GOD alone in terms of How Jesus does find those who DO belong to HIM upon His return?
Have you ever truly sat and considered how unjust and how UNHOLY the type of declaration made that suggest Jesus has already returned?
And how easy is to somehow misrepresent an OTHERWISE silent God?
Or maybe the type of God someone has assumed they can also somehow silence by the "Displacement" of ALL that He as God has said WILL take PLACE ?
And as such on a specific timeline that does involve a "Specific" type of personnel and those same ones in a very specific fashion?
And what does TAKING God lightly look like on ANY given DAY? And that without making mention of the type of DAY that is also the DAY of YOUR.... "Salvation"?
And exactly WHO is that might somehow hope to "Change" the interpretation of ANYTHING God says He's also MADE known so that ALL men are without "Excuse"?
Is it possible the acceptable excuse of anyone who is also accepted of God could PROVE to be, "NO ONE TOLD ME" about these events?
And those events that are also directly related to WHOM if NOT the One True God?
In terms of a realm where the conversation has ONLY to do with Sin and the net results of "Same", how different does ANY persons perspective somehow convert when the type of thoughts that have t do with SIN are more relevant when those same SINS have been considered to be OUR....Sins?
As if a TYPE of "Sin(s) that are somehow different than my Sins or Yours?
And what does a TYPE of person look like who also tries to SUPPRESS what is TRUE? And as such by way of somehow PROTECTING what GOD already knows to be TRUE about ALL mankind?
Do thoughts of or the embracing of OUR imperfect humanitarian project somehow exempt what JESUS came in ORDER to DESTROY?
The same JESUS who many consider to ALSO be an absentee type of GOD?
And HOW those same SINS have somehow affected (Infected) all mankind? What if the thoughts that have to do with OWNERSHIP have yet to be properly aligned?
The type of thoughts which MORE than suggest "The earth and EVERYTHING in the earth do in FACT belong to the Lord (God)?
Whenever someone TRUTHFULLY considers ANYTHING that's also CONTINUOUS and/or CONTINUAL, exactly how Long or Short is this measurement of TIME while trying to somehow extrapolate along that same type of LINE?
And as such within what TYPE of light that's NOT TRUE?
And how has ANY man also TRUTHFULLY considered his own "Imperfection" without there also being a prime example that has ONLY to do with ALL that SIN is NOT?
And how has ANY person also viewed the IMPOSSIBLE in the ABSENCE of ALL that is POSSIBLE and as such ONLY in direct connection WITH.....The Grace of the Lord?
If there ever were to be a TRUTHFUL image of what ANY man (person) also CLINGS to as if their ONLY source of strength, exactly who might this same image also look like?
Is this image also the type of person who roams around in darkness looking for a Prostitute? A child who lies to their parent while ASSUMING they're continuing to do NO HARM to the FAMILY in the perpetuation/progression of their decisions made?
What of the husband or wife both of which are representation of ONE decides to USURP or circumvent a previous VOW made? The same TYPE who fail to TRUTHFULLY consider exactly who else is observing this same behavior?
The same type who have already PROVED how little they've considered the insightful and very nature of OUR FALLEN being(s)?
Insightful to suggest what? Those who have come forth from OUR same 'Being" or those who have been taught about WHOM? Who NOT to be or ONLY who can bring about the type of (Meta) change that ALL men have need of?
And how beautiful are the type of thoughts that pertain to being the First without also considering WHO will be the LAST one to be accepted of the Lord? And that as if trying to SIZE UP the presence of the spirit of the LORD?
1 John 3:4-10
Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact, sin is lawlessness . But you know that he appeared so that he might take away our sins. And in him is no sin.
No one who lives in him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to sin has either seen him or known him.
Dear children, do not let anyone lead you astray. He who does what is right is righteous, just as he is righteous.
He who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning.
The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil's work.
No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God's seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God.
This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the devil are: Anyone who does not do what is right is not a child of God; nor is anyone who does not love his brother. NIV
In terms of somehow destroying the works of the devil, how is it possible for those who are BLIND to then somehow discover exactly WHAT further has need of being DESTROYED?
Those same type of things which may or may NOT be within them and as such ONLY because of who others might try to associate these same TYPE of behaviors with?
Which is worse, to have a demon (or being influenced by one) and refuse to have it cast out or to deny that it's even POSSIBLE there is need of a RIGHTEOUS inquiry made?
These same things (works of the devil) that have supposedly already been DESTROYED yet in the "Physical Absence" of Christ Jesus who is also The Lord of OUR Hearts and Minds?
How many will take the time to read whatever it is they choose to read yet they'll turn to and rely on near "Strangers" to interpret the spirituality (essence) of what they've just read?
Having turned not only to another but nearly as equal someone who has just as much to lose or Gain as do YOU?
To then suggest to "SELF" that you've NOT trusted in nor considered the more COMMON "Democratic Process" that seems to be in "Vogue"?
Having read "Whatever" for the betterment of who though? The person YOU perceive or the TYPE person "The Lord of Heaven and earth" says that YOU are yet ONLY within the realm of being IN HIM?
How is that a person can take the time and spend the money to read a supposed spiritual book that's been written "About" the words of God and seem to have no problem interpreting these type of words "However" they ultimately do?
Yet when reading the words of God that were written for "Whosoever Will" these same type of people (No names or faces mentioned) choose to have "No clue" and with great consistency "Who God Is" and as such beyond some mysterious and random spirit in the Sky?
There's an old saying among established authors which suggest the need to 'Know Your Audience".
These cults of sorts say such things as if ALL wise in their Tongue in Cheek posturing, but I would offer so do Lawyers who are more often than NOT known as "What" whenever their lips are moving (liars)?
In terms of there being ONLY one mediator what type of person CAN or would God place on display as if type of counsel who ONLY as if SELF who watches over their OWN benefit?
Jesus said this about HIS person? I suggest allowing Gods inspired words alone to tell US what WE have need of "Hearing".
John 8:14-18
Jesus answered, "Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going. 15
You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one.
But if I do judge, my decisions are right, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me.
In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid. I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me."
NIV
How deep is the consideration that also SPEAKS to not only who you think you are, but more importantly the part of you that DOES know where you've come from and have derived YOUR NEW NAME?
Are You a first a Christian and then an American? Are you both at the same time without knowing what DOES define either? While claiming to be ONE nation that is also under the sovereignty of the "One True God"?
Are you only considered to be a Christian because the coinage in your pocket suggest a a people who Trust In God? The type of monetary medium that has come from God as if Your Source?
Is there a difference between a type nation in which you live or the body you presently indwell?
What takes place when it does become a well established thought should either somehow be exalted above and beyond a physical ADDRESS that is also a part of the same world that DOES BELONG TO GOD? Who's to say, RIGHT?
So, is it a matter of only practicing what You or I preach, or do we practice what we preach because of WHO did say what we ALSO choose to BELIEVE?
What and Who Has God truly Blessed in terms of somehow hoping to also find either?
In terms of 'Exactly" what it is that maintains any 'Talking Point" who gets to decide if NOT the ONE who initiates the effectual "Discourse" which hopefully follows suit?
God attempts to dispense His 'Wisdom" how? And as such by way of 'WHOM"?
Exactly how 'Potent" will any type of words become whether those that follow below or the type extracted from a "Best Seller"? And how far back does the consideration of "Plagiarism" reach?
To suggest one and the same spirit of God speaking through whomever having become part of His spirited delivery of a type of message that will also "Remain" in the sight of God?
And as such throughout however long divine thoughts of "The Everlasting" realm righteously interprets?
And why in this world does it seem to matter "Who" has spoken as if somehow opposed to 'What" was truthfully spoken? And how has the word "Anointed" also found its dominate voice today?
Many people are saying many things, yet to what "End"?
To then TRUTHFULLY try to consider the possibilities of ALL that 'Outer Darkness" will NOT look like? The type of thoughts that do pertain to this same 'Outer Darkness" having already been Framed by God?
And what is it that's also being presented for consideration whenever the "Fear of the Lord" has been declared as relevant TODAY?
Does the fear of the Lord ONLY find present day relevance because of what the SAME God has SAID is yet to have "Come" (Manifest)?
Where is the specific point/place in a True relationship with the Lord where the Love of God has found opportunity to DO a GOOD work in You or I?
That to mean where the type of Love that ONLY God can reveal does in ALL Truth drive out the 'Fearful Expectation"? The type of thoughts that have Only to do with the coming wrath of God SHOULD have revealed?
Why isn't it being perceived as a compliment as compared to what the words of God do reveal when its heard from Non-believers who suggest, "Christianity is for the WEAK minded'? To then truthfully consider what does make those who are 'Weak".....STRONG and why?
And how can what is yet to come find relevance (home) TODAY in terms of a type of Kingdom this same God has declared is WITHIN those who will believe upon His ONE and only begotten SON?
And exactly where does ones FAITH in what God has said also find its rightful HOME (dwelling place)? The type of consideration that also finds itself in agreement with what? The Christ whom is also In You or I? Yet once more, "Who's to say, Right?
Luke 9:58
Jesus replied, "Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head." NIV
And what do the words of God look like which also have not only BECOME flesh yet even more have since found a "Dwelling" place among men?
The type of words which not only agree with but also could potentially dismiss thoughts which stem from fear? The type of Comforting words He does offer to those who have need of hearing from the lord on OCCASION such as, "Fear not for I have many people in this City"?
Acts 18:9-11
One night the Lord spoke to Paul in a vision: "Do not be afraid; keep on speaking, do not be silent. 10 For I am with you, and no one is going to attack and harm you, because I have many people in this city." 11 So Paul stayed for a year and a half, teaching them the word of God.
NIV
Heb 9:25-28
Nor did he enter heaven to offer himself again and again, the way the high priest enters the Most Holy Place every year with blood that is not his own.
Then Christ would have had to suffer many times since the creation of the world.
But now he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself.
Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment, so Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many people ; and he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him
NIV
And why is it so hard for some to interpret what Faith is when Jesus asked, "Will the Son of man find FAITH when he returns'? As if asking about the condition of those who HAVE been patiently & diligently waiting for His same return? Who's to say 'Whose Who within that type of image, right?
Will relevance also PROVE to have been the predominate "Dynamo" in ALL that you have also suggested about your PERSON that has also ONLY been done "Through God"?
And if ONLY by way of God, who's to say what is RIGHT other than GOD alone in terms of How Jesus does find those who DO belong to HIM upon His return?
Have you ever truly sat and considered how unjust and how UNHOLY the type of declaration made that suggest Jesus has already returned?
And how easy is to somehow misrepresent an OTHERWISE silent God?
Or maybe the type of God someone has assumed they can also somehow silence by the "Displacement" of ALL that He as God has said WILL take PLACE ?
And as such on a specific timeline that does involve a "Specific" type of personnel and those same ones in a very specific fashion?
And what does TAKING God lightly look like on ANY given DAY? And that without making mention of the type of DAY that is also the DAY of YOUR.... "Salvation"?
And exactly WHO is that might somehow hope to "Change" the interpretation of ANYTHING God says He's also MADE known so that ALL men are without "Excuse"?
Is it possible the acceptable excuse of anyone who is also accepted of God could PROVE to be, "NO ONE TOLD ME" about these events?
And those events that are also directly related to WHOM if NOT the One True God?
In terms of a realm where the conversation has ONLY to do with Sin and the net results of "Same", how different does ANY persons perspective somehow convert when the type of thoughts that have t do with SIN are more relevant when those same SINS have been considered to be OUR....Sins?
As if a TYPE of "Sin(s) that are somehow different than my Sins or Yours?
And what does a TYPE of person look like who also tries to SUPPRESS what is TRUE? And as such by way of somehow PROTECTING what GOD already knows to be TRUE about ALL mankind?
Do thoughts of or the embracing of OUR imperfect humanitarian project somehow exempt what JESUS came in ORDER to DESTROY?
The same JESUS who many consider to ALSO be an absentee type of GOD?
And HOW those same SINS have somehow affected (Infected) all mankind? What if the thoughts that have to do with OWNERSHIP have yet to be properly aligned?
The type of thoughts which MORE than suggest "The earth and EVERYTHING in the earth do in FACT belong to the Lord (God)?
Whenever someone TRUTHFULLY considers ANYTHING that's also CONTINUOUS and/or CONTINUAL, exactly how Long or Short is this measurement of TIME while trying to somehow extrapolate along that same type of LINE?
And as such within what TYPE of light that's NOT TRUE?
And how has ANY man also TRUTHFULLY considered his own "Imperfection" without there also being a prime example that has ONLY to do with ALL that SIN is NOT?
And how has ANY person also viewed the IMPOSSIBLE in the ABSENCE of ALL that is POSSIBLE and as such ONLY in direct connection WITH.....The Grace of the Lord?
If there ever were to be a TRUTHFUL image of what ANY man (person) also CLINGS to as if their ONLY source of strength, exactly who might this same image also look like?
Is this image also the type of person who roams around in darkness looking for a Prostitute? A child who lies to their parent while ASSUMING they're continuing to do NO HARM to the FAMILY in the perpetuation/progression of their decisions made?
What of the husband or wife both of which are representation of ONE decides to USURP or circumvent a previous VOW made? The same TYPE who fail to TRUTHFULLY consider exactly who else is observing this same behavior?
The same type who have already PROVED how little they've considered the insightful and very nature of OUR FALLEN being(s)?
Insightful to suggest what? Those who have come forth from OUR same 'Being" or those who have been taught about WHOM? Who NOT to be or ONLY who can bring about the type of (Meta) change that ALL men have need of?
And how beautiful are the type of thoughts that pertain to being the First without also considering WHO will be the LAST one to be accepted of the Lord? And that as if trying to SIZE UP the presence of the spirit of the LORD?
1 John 3:4-10
Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact, sin is lawlessness . But you know that he appeared so that he might take away our sins. And in him is no sin.
No one who lives in him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to sin has either seen him or known him.
Dear children, do not let anyone lead you astray. He who does what is right is righteous, just as he is righteous.
He who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning.
The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil's work.
No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God's seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God.
This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the devil are: Anyone who does not do what is right is not a child of God; nor is anyone who does not love his brother. NIV
In terms of somehow destroying the works of the devil, how is it possible for those who are BLIND to then somehow discover exactly WHAT further has need of being DESTROYED?
Those same type of things which may or may NOT be within them and as such ONLY because of who others might try to associate these same TYPE of behaviors with?
Which is worse, to have a demon (or being influenced by one) and refuse to have it cast out or to deny that it's even POSSIBLE there is need of a RIGHTEOUS inquiry made?
These same things (works of the devil) that have supposedly already been DESTROYED yet in the "Physical Absence" of Christ Jesus who is also The Lord of OUR Hearts and Minds?
How many will take the time to read whatever it is they choose to read yet they'll turn to and rely on near "Strangers" to interpret the spirituality (essence) of what they've just read?
Having turned not only to another but nearly as equal someone who has just as much to lose or Gain as do YOU?
To then suggest to "SELF" that you've NOT trusted in nor considered the more COMMON "Democratic Process" that seems to be in "Vogue"?
Having read "Whatever" for the betterment of who though? The person YOU perceive or the TYPE person "The Lord of Heaven and earth" says that YOU are yet ONLY within the realm of being IN HIM?
How is that a person can take the time and spend the money to read a supposed spiritual book that's been written "About" the words of God and seem to have no problem interpreting these type of words "However" they ultimately do?
Yet when reading the words of God that were written for "Whosoever Will" these same type of people (No names or faces mentioned) choose to have "No clue" and with great consistency "Who God Is" and as such beyond some mysterious and random spirit in the Sky?
There's an old saying among established authors which suggest the need to 'Know Your Audience".
These cults of sorts say such things as if ALL wise in their Tongue in Cheek posturing, but I would offer so do Lawyers who are more often than NOT known as "What" whenever their lips are moving (liars)?
In terms of there being ONLY one mediator what type of person CAN or would God place on display as if type of counsel who ONLY as if SELF who watches over their OWN benefit?
Jesus said this about HIS person? I suggest allowing Gods inspired words alone to tell US what WE have need of "Hearing".
John 8:14-18
Jesus answered, "Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going. 15
You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one.
But if I do judge, my decisions are right, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me.
In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid. I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me."
NIV
Are You a first a Christian and then an American? Are you both at the same time without knowing what DOES define either? While claiming to be ONE nation that is also under the sovereignty of the "One True God"?
Are you only considered to be a Christian because the coinage in your pocket suggest a a people who Trust In God? The type of monetary medium that has come from God as if Your Source?
Is there a difference between a type nation in which you live or the body you presently indwell?
What takes place when it does become a well established thought should either somehow be exalted above and beyond a physical ADDRESS that is also a part of the same world that DOES BELONG TO GOD? Who's to say, RIGHT?
So, is it a matter of only practicing what You or I preach, or do we practice what we preach because of WHO did say what we ALSO choose to BELIEVE?
What and Who Has God truly Blessed in terms of somehow hoping to also find either?
Saturday, September 23, 2017
Part 2 Who TOOK their TIME.........Seriously?
What GOOD is the awareness of sin if there is NO FORGIVENESS of sin to be FOUND?
Is there TRUE reason why it is OK to judge ourselves yet NOT judge others? And as such in the trusted "Light" of the proverbial "Golden Rule"?
And how is that ANY man somehow prays differently for someone else as if someone and somehow who prays differently for Himself? And what does Unity In the Faithfulness of God sound like?
Rom 3:1-6
What advantage, then, is there in being a Jew, or what value is there in circumcision? 2 Much in every way! First of all, they have been entrusted with the very words of God.
3 What if some did not have faith? Will their lack of faith nullify God's faithfulness? 4 Not at all! Let God be true , and every man a liar. As it is written:
"So that you may be proved right when you speak
and prevail when you judge."
5 But if our unrighteousness brings out God's righteousness more clearly, what shall we say? That God is unjust in bringing his wrath on us? (I am using a human argument.) 6 Certainly not! If that were so, how could God judge the world?
NIV
In terms of a spiritual "Win-Win" situation how could anyone realize the best of both worlds without having truthfully considered the two as if "One"?
Rom 3:9-18
What shall we conclude then? Are we any better? Not at all! We have already made the charge that Jews and Gentiles alike are all under sin. 10 As it is written:
"There is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands,
no one who seeks God.
All have turned away, they have together become worthless; there is no one who does good,
not even one."
"Their throats are open graves; their tongues practice deceit."
"The poison of vipers is on their lips."
14 "Their mouths are full of cursing and bitterness."
15 "Their feet are swift to shed blood;
16 ruin and misery mark their ways,
17 and the way of peace they do not know."
18 "There is no fear of God before their eyes."
NIV
The same two worlds that also share in the net results of their own salvation?
What is being suggested when someone suggest they are "Faithful"?
How easy is to assume you're "Safe" in your own conclusions drawn in that "It's everybody else that doesn't understand what You and the Lord supposedly have "All worked Out"?
Is it a requirement that God also be a part any type of statement when someone suggest they're faithful?
What about when someone suggest they're a "Christian"? Does it matter if a man is "Unfaithful to his wife yet considers himself to "Be" faithful to "God Alone"?
What about the type of man who considers himself faithful to God and robs his friends (blind) once they've trusted in him as a man?
Is it considered robbery to smile as if the "Face of a Friend" while supposedly speaking things in the "Private" sector of your heart as if against that same supposed friend?
And who has understood what God intended to be spoken "In Love" what needs to be said? And what does it mean to suggest the "Golden Rule" while offering ANY type of advice as if someone is somehow going to be judged "Differently"?
Is there such a thing as wasted "Time" if not for those who also care very little about what gets said? Things said ALSO according to whose will in that "NO MAN SHOULD PERISH"?
Will some perish and others not? If NOT why NOT and as such will it prove to be an accurate assessment because of WHO they DID choose to reject or NOT?
And IF it IS IMPOSSIBLE to do ANYTHING against what is TRUE, who then HAS done WHAT while Here in bodily form and WHY?
And what does it suggest whenever someone prays for You or I as if we ARE foreigners or Brute Beast that are NOT and HAVE NOT been subjected to ONE and the SAME testing of OUR Faith in God?
2 Cor 13:5-9
Do you not realize that Christ Jesus is in you — unless, of course, you fail the test? 6 And I trust that you will discover that we have not failed the test. 7 Now we pray to God that you will not do anything wrong. Not that people will see that we have stood the test but that you will do what is right even though we may seem to have failed.
For we cannot do anything against the truth , but only for the truth. 9 We are glad whenever we are weak but you are strong; and our prayer is for your perfection.
NIV
Though you give whatever and if it's not been done in the type of love that has "Come From God", what (How) does the soul somehow "Gain Anything" meaningful if NOT a "Brother"? The same type of brother as if from One and the same "Womb"?
And how can a man consider ANYONE from a "Worldly point of view" as if his brother without also realizing that all men MUST be born AGAIN and that OF GOD?
And what are the divine building (elementary) materials used in the building of ONE TEMPLE the ONE True God will also "Inhabit" (dwell in)? And from "Where" are those materials sourced? Meaning those that "WILL LAST"?
And how does a established "Liar" plead his own cause in any moment? And what is at "Risk" to suggest to self that ANYONE and EVERYONE is also a "Christian" whenever it's being implied?
Is there TRUE reason why it is OK to judge ourselves yet NOT judge others? And as such in the trusted "Light" of the proverbial "Golden Rule"?
And how is that ANY man somehow prays differently for someone else as if someone and somehow who prays differently for Himself? And what does Unity In the Faithfulness of God sound like?
Rom 3:1-6
What advantage, then, is there in being a Jew, or what value is there in circumcision? 2 Much in every way! First of all, they have been entrusted with the very words of God.
3 What if some did not have faith? Will their lack of faith nullify God's faithfulness? 4 Not at all! Let God be true , and every man a liar. As it is written:
"So that you may be proved right when you speak
and prevail when you judge."
5 But if our unrighteousness brings out God's righteousness more clearly, what shall we say? That God is unjust in bringing his wrath on us? (I am using a human argument.) 6 Certainly not! If that were so, how could God judge the world?
NIV
In terms of a spiritual "Win-Win" situation how could anyone realize the best of both worlds without having truthfully considered the two as if "One"?
Rom 3:9-18
What shall we conclude then? Are we any better? Not at all! We have already made the charge that Jews and Gentiles alike are all under sin. 10 As it is written:
"There is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands,
no one who seeks God.
All have turned away, they have together become worthless; there is no one who does good,
not even one."
"Their throats are open graves; their tongues practice deceit."
"The poison of vipers is on their lips."
14 "Their mouths are full of cursing and bitterness."
15 "Their feet are swift to shed blood;
16 ruin and misery mark their ways,
17 and the way of peace they do not know."
18 "There is no fear of God before their eyes."
NIV
The same two worlds that also share in the net results of their own salvation?
What is being suggested when someone suggest they are "Faithful"?
How easy is to assume you're "Safe" in your own conclusions drawn in that "It's everybody else that doesn't understand what You and the Lord supposedly have "All worked Out"?
Is it a requirement that God also be a part any type of statement when someone suggest they're faithful?
What about when someone suggest they're a "Christian"? Does it matter if a man is "Unfaithful to his wife yet considers himself to "Be" faithful to "God Alone"?
What about the type of man who considers himself faithful to God and robs his friends (blind) once they've trusted in him as a man?
Is it considered robbery to smile as if the "Face of a Friend" while supposedly speaking things in the "Private" sector of your heart as if against that same supposed friend?
And who has understood what God intended to be spoken "In Love" what needs to be said? And what does it mean to suggest the "Golden Rule" while offering ANY type of advice as if someone is somehow going to be judged "Differently"?
Is there such a thing as wasted "Time" if not for those who also care very little about what gets said? Things said ALSO according to whose will in that "NO MAN SHOULD PERISH"?
Will some perish and others not? If NOT why NOT and as such will it prove to be an accurate assessment because of WHO they DID choose to reject or NOT?
And IF it IS IMPOSSIBLE to do ANYTHING against what is TRUE, who then HAS done WHAT while Here in bodily form and WHY?
And what does it suggest whenever someone prays for You or I as if we ARE foreigners or Brute Beast that are NOT and HAVE NOT been subjected to ONE and the SAME testing of OUR Faith in God?
2 Cor 13:5-9
Do you not realize that Christ Jesus is in you — unless, of course, you fail the test? 6 And I trust that you will discover that we have not failed the test. 7 Now we pray to God that you will not do anything wrong. Not that people will see that we have stood the test but that you will do what is right even though we may seem to have failed.
For we cannot do anything against the truth , but only for the truth. 9 We are glad whenever we are weak but you are strong; and our prayer is for your perfection.
NIV
And how can a man consider ANYONE from a "Worldly point of view" as if his brother without also realizing that all men MUST be born AGAIN and that OF GOD?
And what are the divine building (elementary) materials used in the building of ONE TEMPLE the ONE True God will also "Inhabit" (dwell in)? And from "Where" are those materials sourced? Meaning those that "WILL LAST"?
And how does a established "Liar" plead his own cause in any moment? And what is at "Risk" to suggest to self that ANYONE and EVERYONE is also a "Christian" whenever it's being implied?
Thursday, September 21, 2017
We're Surrounded!
Why doesn't finding out that you're surrounded by undeniable evidence always prove to be "Enough"?
Enough to also suggest what?
Surrendering? Giving in? Giving up?
As if specifically speaking to those who have also been serving the Lord for however MANY number years, when was the last time Sincere PRAISE was also HEARD by your own ears coming FROM your own mouth?
How may different forms of "Challenges" in YOUR life have also participated in a MORE clear OPINION of the ONE True God?
The ONE true God who sits above ALL mankind and as such a ONE who SEE"S ALL?
One God who does see ALL yet also as One who is vague in the consistency of HIS righteous responses towards ALL that HE as God does see?
In terms of ONE TRUE GOD, how many DIFFERENT questions does ONE God ask not only about of ALL mankind, but also His own person?
And those same question ONLY being answered by the VOICED opinion of those whom THE One True God has empowered to speak On His behalf? Whether those who do speak on behalf of The One True God are men OR angels?
Having "Heard" what has been said yet heard in regards to WHAT and WHOM?
Do the following two passages sound even remotely similar without trying to find find their differences? And as such which find they're in agreement only because of who they were not only speaking to but because the two were also found to be in AGREEMENT?
Gen 4:6-7
Then the LORD said to Cain, "Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? 7 If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must master it ." NIV
And how can ANYONE master ANYTHING without also having been SHOWN how and that it is POSSIBLE? Possible yet with one overshadowing caveat, having been "Done Through God"!
And who are those who ask today, How can I if I can't see who God TRULY is?
Acts 10:34-35
Then Peter began to speak: "I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism but accepts men from every nation who fear him and do what is right.
NIV
And how is it POSSIBLE for ANY man to DO what is RIGHT if ANY man has not also FEARED the One True God?
And to those who have never tasted the FEAR OF THE LORD, how is it possible these same ones can suggest they not only KNOW all there is to KNOW about the Love Of the ONE TRUE GOD but also as IF they've somehow been denied ACCESS to the ONE True God?
That is of course within the systemic context where WORDS still hold meaning?
Who is the man who suggest they're also a honest "Partaker" of one and the same spirit of God?
Is it even possible to claim to have Knowledge in the ABSENCE of the Fear of the Lord?
Isa 11:2-3
The Spirit of the LORD will rest on him —
the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding,
the Spirit of counsel and of power,
the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD —
and he will delight in the fear of the LORD .
NIV
Is there such a things as the exclusionary CLAUSE in the WORDS of GOD?
Eph 2:18
For through him we both have access to the Father by one Spirit .
NIV
Enough to also suggest what?
Surrendering? Giving in? Giving up?
As if specifically speaking to those who have also been serving the Lord for however MANY number years, when was the last time Sincere PRAISE was also HEARD by your own ears coming FROM your own mouth?
How may different forms of "Challenges" in YOUR life have also participated in a MORE clear OPINION of the ONE True God?
The ONE true God who sits above ALL mankind and as such a ONE who SEE"S ALL?
One God who does see ALL yet also as One who is vague in the consistency of HIS righteous responses towards ALL that HE as God does see?
In terms of ONE TRUE GOD, how many DIFFERENT questions does ONE God ask not only about of ALL mankind, but also His own person?
And those same question ONLY being answered by the VOICED opinion of those whom THE One True God has empowered to speak On His behalf? Whether those who do speak on behalf of The One True God are men OR angels?
Having "Heard" what has been said yet heard in regards to WHAT and WHOM?
Do the following two passages sound even remotely similar without trying to find find their differences? And as such which find they're in agreement only because of who they were not only speaking to but because the two were also found to be in AGREEMENT?
Gen 4:6-7
Then the LORD said to Cain, "Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? 7 If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must master it ." NIV
And how can ANYONE master ANYTHING without also having been SHOWN how and that it is POSSIBLE? Possible yet with one overshadowing caveat, having been "Done Through God"!
And who are those who ask today, How can I if I can't see who God TRULY is?
Then Peter began to speak: "I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism but accepts men from every nation who fear him and do what is right.
NIV
And how is it POSSIBLE for ANY man to DO what is RIGHT if ANY man has not also FEARED the One True God?
And to those who have never tasted the FEAR OF THE LORD, how is it possible these same ones can suggest they not only KNOW all there is to KNOW about the Love Of the ONE TRUE GOD but also as IF they've somehow been denied ACCESS to the ONE True God?
That is of course within the systemic context where WORDS still hold meaning?
Who is the man who suggest they're also a honest "Partaker" of one and the same spirit of God?
Is it even possible to claim to have Knowledge in the ABSENCE of the Fear of the Lord?
Isa 11:2-3
The Spirit of the LORD will rest on him —
the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding,
the Spirit of counsel and of power,
the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD —
and he will delight in the fear of the LORD .
NIV
Is there such a things as the exclusionary CLAUSE in the WORDS of GOD?
Eph 2:18
For through him we both have access to the Father by one Spirit .
NIV
Friday, September 8, 2017
Who TOOK their TIME..............Seriously?
Rev 12:12
Therefore rejoice, you heavens
and you who dwell in them!
But woe to the earth and the sea,
because the devil has gone down to you!
He is filled with fury,
because he knows that his time is short ."
NIV
Have you ever sat and considered it to be shameful in that the devil (satan) might KNOW more about God than we as those who claim to be believers in HIM do?
Yet without truthful consideration what could he know more about? Humans? Things that are in Heaven? Having considered either while also truthfully considering he is NOT at either location in terms of "Permanency"?
What does it suggest to have your "Sights" set on ANYTHING?
When considering where satan is at any given moment to then consider the only difference BEING are ALL the same things that will somehow prevent a most certain type of behavior from entering "Where"?
And what IF a certain type of behavior is truly nothing more or less than a certain type of honest or dishonest opinion of a TYPE of spirit within?
As if a round about lengthy discussion about everything that defines what a True 'Shadow" of something or someone truly IS?
If someone were to suggest that in this world there are ONLY two type's of people, what would most assume?
If Jesus were to suggest there are ONLY two types of people in this world, how many would choose to "Believe" what he said? The only qualifier BEING who it is that ultimately gets to decide WHO either OR truly is or has been?
How simple is the space (grey area) that can and does separate an "Enemy and a Friend"? Who gets to say, Right?
Stop and think about it for a moment though, if Jesus did NOT say certain things (whenever) how is it possible TODAY someone could claim He did say anything that would also lead to the PLACE of "Uncertainty'?
Who could you, I or anyone for that matter go to and ask whether or not HE DID?
I'm sure most have at least heard the phrase "In A perfect World" used, yet how often is the finite context of "Perfection" misused?
How often does this word and other divinely oriented words get misused because the depth, potential and hopeful future value of their meaning has historically been taken "Lightly"? Only later to then try and apply the wisdom of God by way and use of words such as "It is what it is"?
In terms of the type of person who gets tired of hearing something that keeps getting repeated, is it possible this type of person is also "Telling" on themselves? And as such despite whether or NOT they're AWARE of it?
Is there a reason why people find it a need to precede what they're about to share with others words such as 'Seriously"? As if to suggest however else they've said (Used certain words) things in the past when using certain words was 'What"? Bogus (a lie)?
In a perfect world, would everything Jesus spoke find itself "Applicable"? If NOT found to be applicable, "Why'?
How often do we read where He (Jesus) preceded the essence (spirit) of what He's about to say with words such "Truly"? Was that just the way Jesus or a Nazarene spoke back then in order to hopefully get people's attention when He was speaking seriously?
If keeping "Yourself" from being polluted by this world did have anything to do with a perfect world yet to come, how would anyone also find 'Application" for any "Certain" type of choice words?
Finding their application without also seriously weighing "Who" spoke such words and "why"?
What gets said whenever someone is supposedly kidding around? Kidding around which also 'Suggest" what? Acting "Immature" as if a "Kid" more than often does?
Without truthfully considering what a perfect world 'Might" look like who can speak as if not only speaking about the 'Future" but as one who speaks with the type of voice that has "Matured"?
If the following were being spoken to a crowd of people, who within that same crowd would also more likely be offended by what was being spoken?
The old and the "Learned" or those who saw themselves WITHOUT the NEED to KNOW MORE? And as such having figured out WHO to receive (Type of messenger) that MIGHT have more to say that does pertain to True Life and Godliness?
Is there TRULY a eternal difference between the Two?
Was the author simply being gracious in his choice words "Used" in suggesting those being addressed were acting like "Babies"?
Heb 5:11-14
We have much to say about this, but it is hard to explain because you are slow to learn. In fact, though by this time you ought to be teachers , you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God's word all over again. You need milk, not solid food!
Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness.
But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.
NIV
Is there a TRUE reason why whenever a person begins to talk about God and Godly behavior (Godliness) more often people shy away from such conversations in fear of the possibility of what might happen where two worlds might somehow 'Collide"?
That is unless they're in the 'Mood" to talk along those lines and or it's been clearly understood "WHO" the teacher TRULY is within ANY moment God has also Provided?
To be continued
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore rejoice, you heavens
and you who dwell in them!
But woe to the earth and the sea,
because the devil has gone down to you!
He is filled with fury,
because he knows that his time is short ."
NIV
Have you ever sat and considered it to be shameful in that the devil (satan) might KNOW more about God than we as those who claim to be believers in HIM do?
Yet without truthful consideration what could he know more about? Humans? Things that are in Heaven? Having considered either while also truthfully considering he is NOT at either location in terms of "Permanency"?
What does it suggest to have your "Sights" set on ANYTHING?
When considering where satan is at any given moment to then consider the only difference BEING are ALL the same things that will somehow prevent a most certain type of behavior from entering "Where"?
And what IF a certain type of behavior is truly nothing more or less than a certain type of honest or dishonest opinion of a TYPE of spirit within?
As if a round about lengthy discussion about everything that defines what a True 'Shadow" of something or someone truly IS?
If someone were to suggest that in this world there are ONLY two type's of people, what would most assume?
If Jesus were to suggest there are ONLY two types of people in this world, how many would choose to "Believe" what he said? The only qualifier BEING who it is that ultimately gets to decide WHO either OR truly is or has been?
How simple is the space (grey area) that can and does separate an "Enemy and a Friend"? Who gets to say, Right?
Stop and think about it for a moment though, if Jesus did NOT say certain things (whenever) how is it possible TODAY someone could claim He did say anything that would also lead to the PLACE of "Uncertainty'?
Who could you, I or anyone for that matter go to and ask whether or not HE DID?
I'm sure most have at least heard the phrase "In A perfect World" used, yet how often is the finite context of "Perfection" misused?
How often does this word and other divinely oriented words get misused because the depth, potential and hopeful future value of their meaning has historically been taken "Lightly"? Only later to then try and apply the wisdom of God by way and use of words such as "It is what it is"?
In terms of the type of person who gets tired of hearing something that keeps getting repeated, is it possible this type of person is also "Telling" on themselves? And as such despite whether or NOT they're AWARE of it?
Is there a reason why people find it a need to precede what they're about to share with others words such as 'Seriously"? As if to suggest however else they've said (Used certain words) things in the past when using certain words was 'What"? Bogus (a lie)?
In a perfect world, would everything Jesus spoke find itself "Applicable"? If NOT found to be applicable, "Why'?
How often do we read where He (Jesus) preceded the essence (spirit) of what He's about to say with words such "Truly"? Was that just the way Jesus or a Nazarene spoke back then in order to hopefully get people's attention when He was speaking seriously?
If keeping "Yourself" from being polluted by this world did have anything to do with a perfect world yet to come, how would anyone also find 'Application" for any "Certain" type of choice words?
Finding their application without also seriously weighing "Who" spoke such words and "why"?
What gets said whenever someone is supposedly kidding around? Kidding around which also 'Suggest" what? Acting "Immature" as if a "Kid" more than often does?
Without truthfully considering what a perfect world 'Might" look like who can speak as if not only speaking about the 'Future" but as one who speaks with the type of voice that has "Matured"?
If the following were being spoken to a crowd of people, who within that same crowd would also more likely be offended by what was being spoken?
The old and the "Learned" or those who saw themselves WITHOUT the NEED to KNOW MORE? And as such having figured out WHO to receive (Type of messenger) that MIGHT have more to say that does pertain to True Life and Godliness?
Is there TRULY a eternal difference between the Two?
Was the author simply being gracious in his choice words "Used" in suggesting those being addressed were acting like "Babies"?
Heb 5:11-14
We have much to say about this, but it is hard to explain because you are slow to learn. In fact, though by this time you ought to be teachers , you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God's word all over again. You need milk, not solid food!
Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness.
But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.
NIV
That is unless they're in the 'Mood" to talk along those lines and or it's been clearly understood "WHO" the teacher TRULY is within ANY moment God has also Provided?
To be continued
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, September 6, 2017
They Changed their Minds
Some will suggest a picture is worth a thousand words. Just think if that were true, if someone were to ask 'About" you and all you'd need to do is show them "Your" favorite picture?
Have you ever stopped to consider why any detailed "Narrative" is required whenever "Inquiring Minds" want to know more?
And how would ANY person also perceive their personage also making the word of GOD attractive? And as such without God being the ONE who's doing all the WORK that also....Truly Works?
And what is any verdict truly worth having also heard that same verdict well in advance? If the One who issued that verdict was NOT seen as the "Absolute" highest authority?
And what is any authority that is without those who DO believe in that authority? The type of mercy filled "Author" who is NOT required to compel by way of Force, but instead by "Way" of a type of draw that has Truly TAKEN and maintains the Lead by WAY of an everlasting "Example"?
To then truthfully consider there might be a difference between those lead of the spirit of God and those who have resisted the compelling of that same spirit unto Good works?
Is the divine mutual objective only found in doing good works or are "Good works" only found to be the obedience of those He sends? And how simple is the narrative word ..."Go" when trying to figure it all OUT?
And who is it that refuse having also been created of God?
Rom 1:20
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. NIV
NIV
There's a really interesting game marketed by Mattel called "Pictionary" that might better reveal the type of communication phenomenon I'm trying to outline.
Yet even then, if you've "Never" heard of or played the game you'd probably have no clue what I'm talking about.
In terms of effectual communication why can't people simply carry around a picture album?
The type of album that's full of pictures (reflections) of every type of thing or conditions they've laid eyes on and have clearly understood to be true in their own lifetime?
That way whenever questioned they could simply hand to the one inquiring the appropriate "Picture" that says it "ALL' and simply walk away?
Have you ever considered the image of the 'Cross" that same way?
John 3:14-15
Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life. NIV
Having read this story referred to in John 3, would you suppose those who truly were fearful of dying having been bitten by a deadly snake would also have to be told "Twice" to go and look at the snake on a pole in order to save their lives?
As if being told "Once" didn't "effectually communicate the mutual concern for their obvious "Need"? Told to "Go" and simply cast their eyes upon the "Symbol" Moses was instructed of God to erect?
Under the clear terms of there being ONLY one choice (zero alternatives) how many today would YOU suggest (while also knowing themselves) would hesitate?
I personally think very few would hesitate if they also "Believed" they were about to "Die"? About to die while also being unsure about the liveliness of their continued existence?
Instead of finding themselves desperately "running" to the foot of this God established symbol, do you somehow see them casually sitting around debating the "Outcome"?
Debating because they're not sure who or what to 'Believe" about the life threatening situation they found themselves in?
Time being of great importance while also considering a portion of their own lives were somehow mysteriously on trial? Do you "SEE" them holding counsel meetings among themselves while trying to determine whether or NOT Moses was telling them the "Truth"?
Let's look at a different scenario where someone else was bitten by a poisonous viper. The type of image that came with it's own type of "Unspoken" narrative.
Acts 28:4-6
When the islanders saw the snake hanging from his hand, they said to each other, "This man must be a murderer; for though he escaped from the sea, Justice has not allowed him to live." But Paul shook the snake off into the fire and suffered no ill effects.
The people expected him to swell up or suddenly fall dead, but after waiting a long time and seeing nothing unusual happen to him, they changed their minds and said he was a god.
NIV
Were those during the reign of Moses concerned about their "Immediate" sense of "Death"? Immediate death meaning they were fearful of dying because their vision of "Life" was limited or that their vision that has everything to do with the circumstances which followed "Death" was uncertain?
Who today could by any means could somehow look forward to a "Better Resurrection"?
In terms of borrowing from the image of a type of street interview, how many would you suggest might assume the cross is NOT a universal symbol? And those who would deny the image of the cross might also merely be attempting to silently defend their own image of their own future?
The type of symbol that will also "Interpret" exactly the same "Way" God has already said it WILL?
The type of future where anyone who truthfully considers "The" image of a "Cross" will also meet with an expected end?
When ever its heard in some of the "Motion Pictures" we've all most likely seen, "I'll see YOU in Hell", what will prove to be the image of Hell that was NOT compelling enough to sway the minds of men "Differently"?
Is the question at hand that men are NOT effectual communicators OR that many are refusing to acknowledge EVERY good thing which may or may not be in them?
When and IF ONLY God is considered to BE "Good", exactly how much more or less will ANY man TRULY see within himself ALL that each presently Perceives (believes) to BE TRUE?
Praise is one consideration whereas Praise unto "The One true God" is filled with What?
And what would the Good Lord consider to BE "Empty" Praise and what would those who have been Emptied of SELF also sound LIKE?
Not only for His GOOD Grace, but JUST as equal His inviting MERCY He has shown towards ALL who might Truly consider "What God Has Done" and BELIEVE upon the same ONE He as God has sent?
Philem 6
That the communication of thy faith may become effectual by the acknowledging of every good thing which is in you in Christ Jesus.
KJV
Have you ever stopped to consider why any detailed "Narrative" is required whenever "Inquiring Minds" want to know more?
And how would ANY person also perceive their personage also making the word of GOD attractive? And as such without God being the ONE who's doing all the WORK that also....Truly Works?
And what is any verdict truly worth having also heard that same verdict well in advance? If the One who issued that verdict was NOT seen as the "Absolute" highest authority?
And what is any authority that is without those who DO believe in that authority? The type of mercy filled "Author" who is NOT required to compel by way of Force, but instead by "Way" of a type of draw that has Truly TAKEN and maintains the Lead by WAY of an everlasting "Example"?
To then truthfully consider there might be a difference between those lead of the spirit of God and those who have resisted the compelling of that same spirit unto Good works?
Is the divine mutual objective only found in doing good works or are "Good works" only found to be the obedience of those He sends? And how simple is the narrative word ..."Go" when trying to figure it all OUT?
And who is it that refuse having also been created of God?
Rom 1:20
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. NIV
John 3:21
But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God ." NIV
Yet even then, if you've "Never" heard of or played the game you'd probably have no clue what I'm talking about.
In terms of effectual communication why can't people simply carry around a picture album?
The type of album that's full of pictures (reflections) of every type of thing or conditions they've laid eyes on and have clearly understood to be true in their own lifetime?
That way whenever questioned they could simply hand to the one inquiring the appropriate "Picture" that says it "ALL' and simply walk away?
Have you ever considered the image of the 'Cross" that same way?
John 3:14-15
Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life. NIV
Having read this story referred to in John 3, would you suppose those who truly were fearful of dying having been bitten by a deadly snake would also have to be told "Twice" to go and look at the snake on a pole in order to save their lives?
As if being told "Once" didn't "effectually communicate the mutual concern for their obvious "Need"? Told to "Go" and simply cast their eyes upon the "Symbol" Moses was instructed of God to erect?
Under the clear terms of there being ONLY one choice (zero alternatives) how many today would YOU suggest (while also knowing themselves) would hesitate?
I personally think very few would hesitate if they also "Believed" they were about to "Die"? About to die while also being unsure about the liveliness of their continued existence?
Instead of finding themselves desperately "running" to the foot of this God established symbol, do you somehow see them casually sitting around debating the "Outcome"?
Debating because they're not sure who or what to 'Believe" about the life threatening situation they found themselves in?
Time being of great importance while also considering a portion of their own lives were somehow mysteriously on trial? Do you "SEE" them holding counsel meetings among themselves while trying to determine whether or NOT Moses was telling them the "Truth"?
Let's look at a different scenario where someone else was bitten by a poisonous viper. The type of image that came with it's own type of "Unspoken" narrative.
Acts 28:4-6
When the islanders saw the snake hanging from his hand, they said to each other, "This man must be a murderer; for though he escaped from the sea, Justice has not allowed him to live." But Paul shook the snake off into the fire and suffered no ill effects.
The people expected him to swell up or suddenly fall dead, but after waiting a long time and seeing nothing unusual happen to him, they changed their minds and said he was a god.
NIV
Who today could by any means could somehow look forward to a "Better Resurrection"?
The type of symbol that will also "Interpret" exactly the same "Way" God has already said it WILL?
The type of future where anyone who truthfully considers "The" image of a "Cross" will also meet with an expected end?
When ever its heard in some of the "Motion Pictures" we've all most likely seen, "I'll see YOU in Hell", what will prove to be the image of Hell that was NOT compelling enough to sway the minds of men "Differently"?
Is the question at hand that men are NOT effectual communicators OR that many are refusing to acknowledge EVERY good thing which may or may not be in them?
When and IF ONLY God is considered to BE "Good", exactly how much more or less will ANY man TRULY see within himself ALL that each presently Perceives (believes) to BE TRUE?
Praise is one consideration whereas Praise unto "The One true God" is filled with What?
And what would the Good Lord consider to BE "Empty" Praise and what would those who have been Emptied of SELF also sound LIKE?
Not only for His GOOD Grace, but JUST as equal His inviting MERCY He has shown towards ALL who might Truly consider "What God Has Done" and BELIEVE upon the same ONE He as God has sent?
Philem 6
That the communication of thy faith may become effectual by the acknowledging of every good thing which is in you in Christ Jesus.
KJV
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)