Therefore rejoice, you heavens
and you who dwell in them!
But woe to the earth and the sea,
because the devil has gone down to you!
He is filled with fury,
because he knows that his time is short ."
NIV
Have you ever sat and considered it to be shameful in that the devil (satan) might KNOW more about God than we as those who claim to be believers in HIM do?
Yet without truthful consideration what could he know more about? Humans? Things that are in Heaven? Having considered either while also truthfully considering he is NOT at either location in terms of "Permanency"?
What does it suggest to have your "Sights" set on ANYTHING?
When considering where satan is at any given moment to then consider the only difference BEING are ALL the same things that will somehow prevent a most certain type of behavior from entering "Where"?
And what IF a certain type of behavior is truly nothing more or less than a certain type of honest or dishonest opinion of a TYPE of spirit within?
As if a round about lengthy discussion about everything that defines what a True 'Shadow" of something or someone truly IS?
If someone were to suggest that in this world there are ONLY two type's of people, what would most assume?
If Jesus were to suggest there are ONLY two types of people in this world, how many would choose to "Believe" what he said? The only qualifier BEING who it is that ultimately gets to decide WHO either OR truly is or has been?
How simple is the space (grey area) that can and does separate an "Enemy and a Friend"? Who gets to say, Right?
Stop and think about it for a moment though, if Jesus did NOT say certain things (whenever) how is it possible TODAY someone could claim He did say anything that would also lead to the PLACE of "Uncertainty'?
Who could you, I or anyone for that matter go to and ask whether or not HE DID?
I'm sure most have at least heard the phrase "In A perfect World" used, yet how often is the finite context of "Perfection" misused?
How often does this word and other divinely oriented words get misused because the depth, potential and hopeful future value of their meaning has historically been taken "Lightly"? Only later to then try and apply the wisdom of God by way and use of words such as "It is what it is"?
In terms of the type of person who gets tired of hearing something that keeps getting repeated, is it possible this type of person is also "Telling" on themselves? And as such despite whether or NOT they're AWARE of it?
Is there a reason why people find it a need to precede what they're about to share with others words such as 'Seriously"? As if to suggest however else they've said (Used certain words) things in the past when using certain words was 'What"? Bogus (a lie)?
In a perfect world, would everything Jesus spoke find itself "Applicable"? If NOT found to be applicable, "Why'?
How often do we read where He (Jesus) preceded the essence (spirit) of what He's about to say with words such "Truly"? Was that just the way Jesus or a Nazarene spoke back then in order to hopefully get people's attention when He was speaking seriously?
If keeping "Yourself" from being polluted by this world did have anything to do with a perfect world yet to come, how would anyone also find 'Application" for any "Certain" type of choice words?
Finding their application without also seriously weighing "Who" spoke such words and "why"?
What gets said whenever someone is supposedly kidding around? Kidding around which also 'Suggest" what? Acting "Immature" as if a "Kid" more than often does?
Without truthfully considering what a perfect world 'Might" look like who can speak as if not only speaking about the 'Future" but as one who speaks with the type of voice that has "Matured"?
If the following were being spoken to a crowd of people, who within that same crowd would also more likely be offended by what was being spoken?
The old and the "Learned" or those who saw themselves WITHOUT the NEED to KNOW MORE? And as such having figured out WHO to receive (Type of messenger) that MIGHT have more to say that does pertain to True Life and Godliness?
Is there TRULY a eternal difference between the Two?
Was the author simply being gracious in his choice words "Used" in suggesting those being addressed were acting like "Babies"?
Heb 5:11-14
We have much to say about this, but it is hard to explain because you are slow to learn. In fact, though by this time you ought to be teachers , you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God's word all over again. You need milk, not solid food!
Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness.
But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.
NIV
That is unless they're in the 'Mood" to talk along those lines and or it's been clearly understood "WHO" the teacher TRULY is within ANY moment God has also Provided?
To be continued
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment