Visionary

What if there were a way to know what the future holds?

Does having vision require knowing ALL the specific's so that someone could track those smaller details leading up to an event OR does simply knowing an event is coming suffice?

There are many people who pride themselves on being able to pick a winner? Some might even refer to this sort as the "Gambler" at heart?

Just think if someone could forecast the winning team of a major event held well into the future?

How many people would you suppose would "Get in Line" no matter how long it took because they "Do" and can "Continue" to see this advantage for "All" that it truly is?

How well do You handle advance notice?

Are you one of those who would want not only to somehow (monetize) "Capitalize" in the truest sense on this type of advance notice?

Are You one that would keep what few details about this advance notice you do know to yourself in order to somehow increase Your own chances of success?

Are you one of those who perceive this advance notice as opportunity to somehow realize a much quicker return like some "Ticket Scalper"

What about those who just want to "Spectate"?

The type who just want to watch it all take place from a choice viewing perspective? The type of person who loves to "Spend" their life watching so they can write their "Own" narrative on the other side of the event?

Are You the type who likes to scoff at those who get duped? Are You One of those who like to tell yourself  and others like You exactly what You would do differently the next time if the opportunity ever revisited?

Just think of the advantage some people get to enjoy when they also know that a specific Companies IPO has been set in motion? Just knowing well in advance more often than not has "Huge" advantages.

Why is it most of these type of advantages always seem to get served up to a group of people who always seem to have and hold onto the upper hand in this Life?

Are You they type who may not already be overly "Fortunate" but instead are one of those who require a little more time in order to find a way to move purchasing resources around in order to realize the "Windfall" afforded by "Advance Notice"?

Maybe your the "Last minute person" that waits and waits to see who's doing what at the upper crust level as if studying Your financial wind sock of sorts? You know the "Warren Buffets" and "Rockefeller's of this world? The upper crust whom everyone that's in the know hopes to someday find themselves able to emulate?

In terms of finding out which type you are, wouldn't it depend upon how many different factors being weighed that ultimately prove to define the type of persons in question?

Let's try and build a more detailed visual of not only this type of foreknowledge but as such which will then go on to define/depict those who can "See" this type of advantage for the ALL that it truly is.

Let's say most everyone have at least heard rumor of this "Big Event"? A type of event that will be unprecedented in its kind?

This event in its nature is also rumored to have two opposing sides. One that fits the definition of some type of competition on the surface? Meaning two opposing forces have aligned themselves along specific lines.

Exactly how many people would want to know who the major players are in this event and their strengths?

It just "Makes Sense", right?

Meaning who are the known champions that will be participating in the event, who do have a "Track record" and are well "Known" for their historical "Victories"?

On the surface, knowing who the historical winners would seem to make sense right? That while trying to extrapolate on a more finite level who it would appear also has the upper hand in the event before choosing sides?

That of course being linked directly to the odds makers who usually set the tone of the event in terms of how much gets wagered?

There might be some who see this advantage on the surface as being so huge they would be ALL in whereas others might have doubts and hold back and wait for more details to roll in and unfold as the specific time of the event draws closer before placing their wager?

Fine, let's cut to the "Chase Scene"....

I think those who already have some type of "Feel" as to who "Jesus" is also know where this is going, but is that the "Real" question that needs to be asked?

Shouldn't the question be, "Where are YOU Going" when this event not only comes but also passes? Exactly what is it that will determine who sits where and who the major players were and still are within the event that's is "Today" one that is considered "Eternal"?

When does eternity begin and when does it truly "End"? Who sets the limits of eternity? Who is that does set the boundaries? Who is that chalks out the lines of this event and who throws the flags when someone goes out of bounds from on play to the next?

Is the "Present" only "Down Here" and eternity only some where "Up There" above the clouds?

Are the participants only Angels and mere Mortals are all involved in some form or fashion?

Do some have the advantage in ANY "Event" and IF they Do have an advantage what would that advantage "Be"?

What are you a "Part of" or maybe "What have you found yourself disconnected from"?

"Lord" means "Lord" and forever Wills himself to Remain as such. Exactly what do you Know and how much have You or I assumed to be True while "Down Here"

What does having a "Lord" mean to You and does whomever your Lord prove him or herself to be Keep his or her word in EVERY instance? That to include whether or not that existence finds itself Down Here or Up There?

In terms of Time perspective, how long is a generation Down Here and How Long is a generation Up there?

Matt 24:30-35

"At that time the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky, and all the nations of the earth will mourn. They will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of the sky, with power and great glory. And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other. 

"Now learn this lesson from the fig tree: As soon as its twigs get tender and its leaves come out, you know that summer is near. Even so, when you see all these things, you know that it is near, right at the door. 

I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened. 

Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away. 
NIV

John 15:1-17
"I am the true vine, and my Father is the gardener. 

He cuts off every branch in me that bears no fruit, while every branch that does bear fruit he prunes so that it will be even more fruitful. 

You are already clean because of the word I have spoken to you. Remain in me, and I will remain in you. No branch can bear fruit by itself; it must remain in the vine. Neither can you bear fruit unless you remain in me. 

"I am the vine; you are the branches. If a man remains in me and I in him, he will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing. 

If anyone does not remain in me, he is like a branch that is thrown away and withers; such branches are picked up, thrown into the fire and burned. 

If you remain in me and my words remain in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be given you. This is to my Father's glory, that you bear much fruit, showing yourselves to be my disciples. 

"As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you. Now remain in my love. If you obey my commands, you will remain in my love, just as I have obeyed my Father's commands and remain in his love. 

 I have told you this so that my joy may be in you and that your joy may be complete. My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. 

Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends. 

You are my friends if you do what I command. I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know his master's business. 

Instead, I have called you friends, for everything that I learned from my Father I have made known to you. 

You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you to go and bear fruit — fruit that will last. Then the Father will give you whatever you ask in my name. 

This is my command: Love each other. 
NIV

The "Establishment" of the Third Person

The word "Establishment" seems to be one of the more recent buzz words in play today. Nearly equal though is the quieter insinuation that's left standing in its shadow are the the words "Transparency" and "Anti-establishment".

Another word being the vagueness found within the word "Politically" correct.

People hear different things whenever they hear "Politically Correct" being used. What I personally hear is a encrypted narrative about a type of people who refuse to apply their own logic and think for themselves.

These type of people wont go the extra mile that "Unfortunately" is needed today (due diligence) when choosing different "News Media" outlets.

The more common "News" seeker climate seems to have more to do with how well the "news cast" looks and has dressed for the occasion.

As if a cult of personalities that have visually prepared themselves not only for some runway exhibition but even more as to whether of Not they'll be perceived as visually appealling in in the eyes of the "Beholder".

This same shoe fits many feet today, wouldn't you agree?

Much of which has little or nothing to do with whether or NOT they're speaking of "Thoroughly Investigated" minute bites of "Information" that DO and WILL lead up to the "Truth" ultimately being revealed?

In terms of a man that drinks from His own well, how muddied has anyone;'s drinking  "Water" become these days?

Where is the value of wisdom that speaks of Water that's been contaminated? What does "Living' Water" taste like these days and where does a person go in order to find this water that can sustain a righteous life style and/or opinion?

Wouldn't that also depend upon those who are determining what is considered "Righteous" in this world? And as such without having visited and paid (conjured) some "Medium" or estranged media that has in fact been "Outsourced"?

Exactly where do YOU get YOUR News from and is it being FOUND by YOU as the sitting jury to be trustworthy of late?

James 3:11-12
Can both fresh water and salt water flow from the same spring?
NIV

Do we need to remind ourselves once more of the value of any people and their History that's "Retold"? A history of a most certain type of people who hold the propensity to "Repeat themselves"? Not to mention those particular individuals that actually give substance to the word "Repeat"?

Is there any truth behind the reason why CNN is also being referred to as "Clinton News Network" by so many?

It's one thing for something at first to be considered a joke, yet when does any Joke become a Joke that's on "You"? The type of joke that does require not only "Observers" but also "Believers" of what's being spoken and that does not match up with the things they continue to "Do"? Common sense would suggest a Liar is not only in the room but also in Your Living room having been invited via "Satellite'?

In terms of the real meaning of something that is "New" which then in turn does in fact become "NEWS", shouldn't that said news also reflect as MORE informative than the last 12 hour or 12 month cycle of news already broadcast?

Isn't there a real reason why the said "News" no longer seems like something that is fact "NEW"?

Why does any supposed news that's also about politics ALWAYS seem to speak as it "USUALLY" does? Shouldn't news in its truest sense speak of something that is "NEW"?

To the Brethren out there have we failed to remember what the word "Gospel" was and IS intended to insinuate in terms of 'Good News"? What is it that makes any News also "Good News"?

In terms of extrapolation, why isn't it true most people who do enjoy watching the news are hoping to hear about something that's different?

What if common Sense were seen as something intangible that must be "Created" through the exercising of words?

Not to suggest something that's made in a Lab, Test tube, warehouse or on some assembly line, but such a thing which manifest as the result of positive interaction between people? Mutual conclusions which then manifest as the result of honor and respect for the Truth which has been "DRAWN" from within each?

We're living in a world where the invisible "They" we all like to refer to as we explore talking points has also become the dumping grounds for our emotions. Such a place which includes many of the things we don't agree with.

As we talk or converse we also flirt with this "Third Person", yet do we truly find ourselves honoring or respecting what we each want to make the world around also know we will take and/or make a"Stand" for?

This third person who conveniently never seems to be available or there in the moment to defend themselves, further emphasize or expound on what they've "Supposedly" said!

Exactly why are most arguments based upon peoples lack of memory? Tat to mean where there's so much replaying of what was supposedly said and often times only seconds prior?

By the end of an argument hardly anything being presented as if the Truth in turn ends up having anything to do with why the argument began in the first place? All that gets heard is "You said" which gets rebutted with "No You said this"?

How is that going to Play out with Jesus at His coming where some will hear, "I don't know you"?

What if this third person were to actually have a name? And that name as if a being whose name is Truth?

This format of conversing doesn't fit together with more common words such as "Heart Felt, Compassionate, Understanding, Considerate and last but not least "Thoughtful". Are the words of a creator who also creates through the use of words (Speach) also Well thought out words"?

The exclusion of Truth leaves much more to be said about the essence of humanity that's choosing to try and encrypt the conveyance of their heart during a face to face transfer of thought(s).

Many today desire to go nowhere near the truth. Could this reason have anything to do with the so called freedoms they would otherwise have to give up if they did? Exactly how many "Smaller Worlds will fit inside of a much bigger World"?

Exactly who is it that will ultimately decide where the boundaries of truth begin and end within any Kingdom that's also truly considered to be a "Sovereign Kingdom"?

It's easy to assume everyone else that's part of our conversation(s) knows exactly what we're talking about as we try to populate and in turn polarize the atmosphere with our words that will suit personal comfort.

Take for example a husband and wife conversation within an otherwise neutral day that turns "South" into an argument without any supposed "Early notice"? Why is it when a simple question such as "What do you want to eat for dinner" gets placed on the table there can be such a direction shift in the attitudes towards one another?

Is it "Really" true though to suggest there was no "Early notice" or would it be more accurate to clearly state that the spirit of disagreement was there all along? In that it was simply waiting for a place to rightfully take up both space and time in terms of consumption?

A type of presence where maybe only one of the two was made aware of it's presence? Because if both parties are truly "For" each other, why do they both not turn and attack this essence (spirit) along the same "Front" because they are enjoined as if of ONE spirit?

What does a welcomed spirit look like?

How does it gain strength enough that it can manifest? Could such a spirit of divisiveness stay hidden among the baggage of our "Emotions"? One that only pops out and shows its face on demand as its host claims being unaware of it's presence?

Keep in mind within this example it applies to two people who claim they love each other through vows taken? And those vows made "Before" and in the eyes and awareness of God who is their mutual creator?

Imagine though if this same spirit of what I'm suggesting were to take place between two people who've yet to confess any type of coherent, long term and favorable devotion towards each other?

Yet NOW you have two people who are still choosing their OWN methodology as to how both are now somehow trying to "Cope" with this thing (relationship) they have since taken upon themselves and enjoined in? And as such without the truthful acknowledgement of what this third person spirit looks or sounds like as it's tone changes?

SO what's the easiest escape plan should things not work out where no one is "Willing" to find agreement? How long does agreeing to disagree work within a lasting marriage? That is before the real essence of the DISAGREEMENT later makes the choice to steal yet another choice and resurface some where else?

You know that obscure :"Somewhere Else" such as another argument that started out about something Totally different?

Obscure to mean where someone see it as a need to pick a fight in order to "Eventually" get heard? One where the results of any supposed real fight will always equal some type of pain? Away from which any Normal human would also look to escape from? Does it make "SENSE" to you?

Back to the dinner in question, "They" start out talking as if they're on the same page, but let something as simple as "Where do you want to got eat" come up and one of the two might easily find themselves sleeping on the couch either that or silently staring at the back of their mates head or out the bedroom window all night long. Was it really all about dinner?

More often though, isn't it true that if a talking point stays on the table for very long what usually gets fleshed out or maybe "Flushed" out is the not so obvious "Us vs Them"?

What about what's in their Heart? Is it more often the insecure question that's trying to find a way out that's not finding it's opportunity to where it can gets asked, "Do you know Me?

Instead and because of doubts it gets heard "Are you still with Me and For me" or "Are You against Me"?

The substance of the heart I would like to assume everyone hopes to be able to "find" is the heart of somone that is for them. Why is that on one occasion agreement can easily be expressed yet in another moment of time the right words are not available or are no where to be found?

How much of this mystery truly has to do with the type of atmosphere, sense of awareness of our OWN presence that is "IN ORDER"? In "Order" to mean certain conditions to where CAN find ourselves "Able" to express what's in the heart and without ANY form of reprisal whether it be at present or at some point in the future?

When any two people honestly sit down in an attempt to converse, like it or not we each give away tiny informational nuggets of information about ourselves. These things may seem to be encrypted, yet they're most definitely in the air we move around with the sound of our "Voice" and with the added punctuation of our not so silent body language.

Simply put there are just certain things the individual has taught themselves to trust (read) in during the transferal of things that are within our hearts. In terms neutrality and what God has made equal some are simply better at this mining (Discernment) process than others, yet that still doesn't explain why?

My first question would be, What is the person(s) in question belief system built upon? What fundamental framework are they trying to task with supporting what this fragmented "World" tries to seduce them into believing as if ALL that is said is also True?

Is there truly such a thing as Neutrality within what gets said? Meaning where an offender simply says, "I'm sorry" and as a result the "Trust" slate gets completely wiped clean?

Or does an interpretation of what gets said need "More" than anything of find find itself able to more than WANT to trust what is being spoken? I think we all want to Trust, yet is this prudent within what has become even more predominate in this world in terms of what actually has fueld and in turn "Caused' an increased sense of  "Lack of trust"?

Herein lies the danger in trying to rely too heavily on someones (recorded) words whether it be via texting or email. Is there TRULY a difference between seeing someones words captured in print versus "Hearing" them speak?

News has entered into a "New" venue of late. Pay closer attention when you find yourself actually listening to a News broad cast of late.

I didn't catch it for its more recent regularity until of late, but today Most reporters can be heard trying to "Emphatically" implement/re-introduce words such as, "So and so is with us "On record" in their prefaced reporting. Much of this in my opinion has to do with more recent attacks on the media's "Credibility" across the board.

It all boils down to a formula of comfort in My opinion. That comfort being what each person CAN handle or accommodate that is looking for a branch to "Perch" on in their own logic Tree" as well how much time or themselves they are interested in investing in what gets said and does go a supposed "Record".

Exactly who is this gate keeper (Master) of the spoken record(s) that are also supposedly being 'Well" kept and within a "Trustworthy" place?

In terms of antiquity TRULY what has ANYONE learned about not only a "Messenger", but even greater a messenger that is also "Trustworthy'?

Prov 25:13
Like the coolness of snow at harvest time is a trustworthy messenger to those who send him;
he refreshes the spirit of his masters.
NIV

Matt 11:10
This is the one about whom it is written:

"'I will send my messenger ahead of you, who will prepare your way before you.'
NIV

Some might argue with, "But what about hand written letters throughout antiquity"? The medium where people for centuries found themselves able to convey trustworthy thoughts regardless of the miles that separated them?

I'm firmly of the opinion, "A person CAN find out more about what they may or may NOT know about a person best when they're NOT present. Meaning many of those things "Said" we suggest to ourselves we noit only say we "Know" but also have been taught to "Trust"!

That is until the strength and weight of the undeniable comes along and whispers to us otherwise.

My argument is that today people are NOT weighing not only the words of others by the same standards "They" used to but also "They" are NOT weighing their own words by that same standard before the jury pool has been seated.

We have more people (another form of Media that may of may NOT be just) telling us today not only what everyone has said, but their intentions and motivation for having said so as well.

In this type of frame work not only is there barely enough room for the personage in question, much less what may or may NOT be true that concerns other Narratives being offered.

What ever happened to the age old phrase, "I don't know ask them, they are of age and can speak for themselves"? Why the need for so many other opinions today before a person is believed?

Surely there's a Righteous response EVERYONE can agree with floating around out there somewhere that's JUST waiting to be heard? Some might even refer to it as "Common Sense"?

Others might even relate to this answer as "True Wisdom"?

Today there's rarely a clean and clear delivery of words that ALSO find themselves without the need for some form of validation (bias) being mixed with them (words).

I've heard of a "Horse or Dog" whisperer what claim they know what's going through an animals mind, but what about a "Human Whisperer"?

I fully believe there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with "News" in and of itself yet only when it's NOT been tainted with "Bias or Slant" of any kind.

The dispensation of unbiased news these days is nearly "Impossible" to find. Why is this? You simply can't find this "Medium" on any Radio or TV network these days.

We might claim we're ALL speaking the same language, yet TRULY are we? The day when we ALL do speak the same language what will it sound like? "Common Sense" maybe?

Many side show reporters are attempting to try and sound like they are without bias and that by way by way of  Trashing "Everyone"!

Usually all this type of horse play (no pun intended) is turns out to be is a ploy to try and get everyone to switch over and listen to them.

How easy is it to learn to loathe a "Politician", yet how many personalities have failed see what they have to say is beginning to sounds much like a "Politician". sw

My suggestion is? Refuse to be someone else's experimental project. Stop investing in conversation that's obviously NOT going anywhere or getting you or "Them" anywhere that's also 'Meaningful"!

Especially if the word Meaningful were being viewed as though it were an additional "Sense" that's full of the willingness having been made aware of all that is held in Common.

The acknowledgement of having One and the same creator is The Best place to start looking don't you think? Who better would know than the one that did create "Man Kind".

Don't simply look for a cult or a religion, instead set out in an earnest quest that does in fact Find what is True and Trustworthy....The type of Truth that does and can hold all things together and that through the completed exercise of ALL the things this world would otherwise twist and contort to the contrary!

My heart felt advice would be to make the "Choice" that WILLS it and will NOT accept anything less than the Truth!

Such a place might not only "Prove" to be where "Common ground is found, but a ground that is solid as a "Rock" and can be built upon.... Just saying!

Make of this following passage what You Will, yet know this that does pertain to a future that is no longer to be considered  one that is also to be considered as Far away in the 'Distance" that is and Will Be at the "Head" over ALL mankind".

Rev 6:9-11

When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained. They called out in a loud voice, "How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?"

Then each of them was given a white robe, and they were told to wait a little longer, until the number of their fellow servants and brothers who were to be killed as they had been was completed.
NIV

SW

What's your zip "Code"?

The criminal mind that governs a criminal at heart that exist in a world that does not know what it believes beyond doubt to be true depicts someone that enjoys taking candy from an baby. sw

As a sounding board I submit the following passage of divine writ as if the overshadowing mindset of all who do believe and also hope to enjoy all that they believe to be True. And as such because of "Who" spoke (inspired) these Holy and held precious words.

As would any father that also hopes to find themselves truly being "Loved" by His children, the author of these words chooses to address the very essence of a certain people who have chosen to acknowledge and accept the sound of their fathers voice.

A True father within His own household who by way of His form of teaching His children is forever using the "They, Them, We and Us" comparatives.

1 John 4:4-6
You, dear children, are from God and have overcome them, because the one who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world.

They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.
NIV

I try very hard not to get bogged down in debates which revolve around and seem to get their strength and motivation from worldly mindsets. What I'm suggesting is, "That everyone who has an opinion also has some sort of a filter through which they process their own findings while trying to make sense of this world".

As does any "Meaningful" picture, it's owner will more often than not choose to frame such a picture in like fashion. Meaning would you frame a million dollar painting known for being done by a famous US figure within a $10 Walmart frame that was made in China?

As Christians (Christ Like) we have a spiritual obligation would you agree?

This obligation suggest that WE do what?

That we each Go to every extreme we have "Individually" believed and deemed as possible in order to uphold the values which Christ died in order to see those same values implemented and put into practice? Is that all there is though? That to mean the limitations of what we alone believe?

Just because some fail to want to participate in this outlook on life should NOT somehow detour "What"?

What many claim they do have in common both in theory and by way of proving through the exercise of "Good" deed(s) God alone has provided for that actually do continue to consistently hold them together?

We can suggest One Nation that's under God, yet is not the whole world under God in the bigger picture? What is it among ANY sect of people(s) that also suggest they've mutually chosen to personally uphold what that same God values in His Heart?

Exactly what force is in "Play" that would otherwise look to undermine such an endeavor? A search held in common among all mankind with exception to those who have been deceived and/or taught otherwise?

What would motivate ANY enemy that would otherwise hope to over rule or overshadow such a concept that is also being "Mutually enjoyed" because of what it offers?

Under the sovereignty of this premise what business does any One United nation have that also entitles it to the right to somehow interrupt the core beliefs of another nation? Does God force Himself and His way on the same ones He has also provided the Right to Choose?

Why would One God suggest a chosen people? Chosen maybe, yet are they a People He alone has chosen or are they also a  people that have chosen Him TO BE their God?

Are some now trying to force feed said "Freedom" down the throats of those who see no inherently TRUE value in it? How can a nation claim their aiding the "God Given Right" of all mankind while at the same time suppressing a certain sect of its own people within a form of governance it is ALSO claiming it "UP-holds" within its own God given territory?

And as such without certain and specific Laws being upheld and enforced?

How important is any ONE mans legacy? Especially when compared to the millions of others who are also and  HOPEFULLY in pursuit of the same thing by way of their very God given nature?

Values which were originally intended to "Attract" those of like mindedness within a world that is otherwise spiritually confused and being torn apart by the very things which opposes them being brought together with a specific set of core beliefs?

What happens when any people allow factions to seep in among them (sheep vs wolves)? Factions that only look to divide and in turn devour (over the Long term) those that claim to believe the same and certain things?

Especially those who claim they're trying to escape or "Leave behind an old mindset in order to Join and be a part of a promise they too might enjoy?

Are some or many today only coming here with a short term plan that leads to financial wealth they only intend to return "Home" with that same form of wealth? While once again leaving behind all other enrichment(s) this culture offers them? What is found within the act of being "Repatriated"?

How can some never find themselves domesticated and that because "Home" is where their heart of hearts truly resides?

It's one thing to leave behind certain core values as the very thrust of the mindset a prior Tyranny and oppression forced them to consider as opposed to a migration where NOTHING gets left behind.

Exactly who is that's allowing themselves to be deceived throughout the ENTIRE unfolding of this event?

I invite you to study what you also suggest you believe in. I suggest we all deeply consider not only each other, but more importantly what One God intends to accomplish through this exercise better known as "This Life Time"?

One thing all mankind must face is the day when each must decide exactly who it is we each have "Chosen" to follow!

A choice made by way of a mindset that was by design created to rescue as many that will choose to accept this same mindset as if their very own and not simply an opinion from somewhere "Out there"....or in some instances "From Way out there"!

Why would I suggest spiritual mindset?

A spiritual mindset follows what?

Does it always follow what is sees and hears as if what the spiritual example does yet only because the example we do choose to follow has also been "Judged" and found to be "Righteous"? Exactly what has any one person chosen to Justify while in this world other than themselves?

Found to be righteous "Yes" yet found to be righteous by "Whom"?

This said "Whom" is also the personage we suggest we also agree and further agree to suggest is OUR God which governs as those who are "Like Minded" as a whole, correct? A part of a whole that does recognize its God in control of Himself as though supreme and sovereign.

What I'm suggesting is nothing "New" or some ground breaking news.

No, instead what I'm suggesting is there IS today an increasingly and "Intense" propensity whose eternal hope is to get as many that "Will" themselves to be lead away from being "Like Minded".

Like minded enough to where they find themselves no longer in agreement with God. And when I say God, I fully intend that to mean "Our Mutual Creator".

The discovery of this God that should help the individual incorporate themselves within a corporate mindset (state) that does act "Against" itself. What is any illness considered that also attacks its "Host"? Cancer?

Exactly who is the "Host" of who we each suggest we follow with all our heart, mind, soul and strength? Many suggest the "Lord of Host" yet how many have deeply examined the word Host beyond what some experimental mind trip/vacation such as the movie "Alien" promotes?

I'm personally of the opinion that trying to maintain a trustworthy course "Today" in this life in itself is nearly impossible without a divine alternative to retreat into. Many get brave, they then go out and returned all bruised and battered, yet what type of narrative does this leave behind that also accurately defines the "Host we claim resides within? Can you or have you seen your true enemy "Yet"?

It's easy to "Demonize" just about anything in a world where nothing is perfect, yet in whose name do we demonize ANY internal "Host" we've also believed to be True?

Exactly what Host are any of us TRYING to talk about at any Given Moment in our talking points that pass through our so called "Mind' we also suggest have inhabited our "Being"?

There are so many alternatives that oppose the thoughts of being "Of One Opinion" that much like a finger print it's getting increasingly challenging to find any two opinions that are alike at any "One". That to further suggest as if those moments have also been "Given" (provided) as mutual opportunity to discover one and the same thing (The One True God).

Think about it, if someone chooses NOT to believe in ONE and the same God, how can there ever be a "Venue" where two or more can find not only the opportunity but also find and "Hear" the expressions of others who are in "Thought(s) and Deed(s)" like minded"?

The God who is also "Christ Like" personifies "Who"? Himself? Only if you've also adopted what this otherwise invisible God has said about "Himself", correct?

When was the last time ANY religion actually "Saw" their God? That is to where that same visual could be shared with others (more importantly also found to be Believable)?

How easy is to be lead astray when a person doesn't TRULY Know what it is about there God own personal God they also believe beyond doubting?

Now Try and ask a Nation that same Question? See if the results even remotely look alike?

Deeply consider this question if you're not afraid of what is True, "Do ALL Gods who are also found within the minds of men (in spiritual form) find that those thoughts are the direct results of a personalized God who has testified about him or herself"?

Who does Your God suggest that He is? Who is that has also testified on behalf of Your God and what exactly is it that Your God has said that also agree's with what Your God has said is also "True about You"?

What have any of us discovered about ourselves to where we can then openly express and that without fear of some form of external "Reprisal"?

I wish to not only challenge but more importantly have engaged healthy thoughts. The type of thinking of those who may presently be being "Torn" or at minimum struggling between two "Political" opinions.

The reassurance of being Godly or "Like God" is to know beyond personal doubt where we each stand on talking points which seem to dominate the social map of any nation.

Point one what is it to suggest You or I also "Know" God? Secondly, what does it mean to suggest that YOU or I are known by God and that for the greater Goodness we also hope to find in Him?

Is it always a safe assumption to conclude that our own opinion (24/7/365) is the most "Reliable" opinion that's "Out there"? And what if others are not found to be "For You"? Instead those who are seemingly forever opposed?

When is there ever going to be a reason that's also socially accepted as True 100 percent of the Time any of us have also found to be the TRUE reason for existence within in this nation?

The same nation that chooses to acknowledge itself as the United States of the Americas?

For we cannot do anything against the truth , but only for the truth.

Exactly what would a distorted Image of God look like in this world? Exactly what would motivate however many to try and distort the Image of God in the earth?

If it were thought to be  a crime, how many would continue? How is it possible to distort something that is not tangible that can be seen with natural eyes or be physically touched or handled on demand?

Why is it so easily assessed as cheap entertainment at times when a small child is given a set of crayons or painting instruments and a blank sheet of paper where they're then instructed to illustrate "God" to their best ability?

In terms of distorting the image of God have you ever tried to explain exactly who it is that's guilty of such a crime in a room full of people and that without pointing a finger?

What I mean is simply laying out the charge while trying to "Clearly" articulate exactly why a certain "Few" would choose to continue to distort what is otherwise True in the sight of God? Is it even possible while knowing what God has to say?

The pointing out of certain things that were by design and ave been tasked with aligning themselves with the purposes in having also been created of One and the same Creator?

At what point can situational ethics present the type of venue where another "player" steps in and robs a created being of such glory? A type of glorious day where not only some aspect of God has been accurately revealed, but also one where that revealing gets to be mutually "Enjoyed"?

Gen 1:26
Then God said, "Let us make man in our image , in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."  NIV

In terms of dominion, there being an unseen war and a final outcome (whether totally understood or not) why is it essential to recognize not only a God as the Champion of those processes, but even further Jesus as the "Christ" who sustains this often times and otherwise invisible "Hope" ?

Such a "Hope" that also reveals and agree's with the declaration which states, "Christ In You"?

The bulk of mankind is slowly arriving or being turned to such a place where its being ever so slowly understood, that what some can or can NOT see that does pertain to the Truth about God actually does have everything to do with what an individual chooses to believe to be "True" or "Not"?

And as the result a war that is since still being fought that began and continues to be waged through the mere expressions of "Words"?

I used to (skim) read over certain things found in the bible as if insignificant or none applicable. Insignificant to not only interpret as such that has since proven to have everything to do with my personal inability and reason for my own forgetfulness that would otherwise lead me to strain in order to somehow see things take up their rightful place in the sight of God.

A type of forgetfulness that looks much like a person who studies their own reflection in a mirror in the morning and in the evening questions who they then see on the other side of the events of each day and the long term affects of same? How does a man then plead anything that also truthful without the Hope of Christ In them?

Certain things that go on to prove and require more and more as to "Why" they may or may NOT see things in the fashion they do?

The context of the passage below places the author in the throws of trying not only to explain but also to get as many as were "Willing" to "See" why some were failing to recognize the interaction of God among them. That is also to suggest in the fashion He does reveal himself and the reason they did or did NOT see those same things

In no way misunderstand me in that Paul (author) was in NO WAY trying to justify God or what God was doing in their sight, yet how do we know this?

I personally see this passage as Paul's most accurate attempt at expressing the otherwise elusive meaning of the word "Weakness" in Gods sight. Exactly what was at the heart of Paul's weakness, "His inability to "See" God for who He is? And that in order that He might somehow begin to understand God and why He (God) does things the "Way" He does?

Something he (Paul) not only understood on a much deeper level than most but more importantly the why He eventfully does come to a place to where he can see God (Holy Spirit) in motion and that for who He (God) is and understands Him (God) to be?

And all the above being applied and for "Whose" ultimate benefit?

Much like a father, what Paul was trying to teach on was the same thing He also had to go through before God could teach him how to grasp (take hold of) of a more complete scenery of Gods interaction.

A Most certain revealing where he (Paul) knew that God planned to do through not only his personage on earth but also whosoever will pursue those same things in the fashion he (Paul) did and as such that would hopefully become the same "Type" of passion that comes to life within those who have believed?

One more thought before you read what Paul places before those who consider themselves converted as those who also suggest they've believed, "How can or is it even possible for someone who's deceived to then truthfully examine themselves?

2 Cor 13:5-10
Examine yourselves to see whether you are in the faith; test yourselves. Do you not realize that Christ Jesus is in you — unless, of course, you fail the test?

(How is Paul so sure they will find that he and others had not "Failed" the testing of their Faith?) 

And I trust that you will discover that we have not failed the test. Now we pray to God that you will not do anything wrong. Not that people will see that we have stood the test but that you will do what is right even though we may seem to have failed.

For we cannot do anything against the truth , but only for the truth.

(In a very nice manner Paul is trying to explain his own likeness unto The Father "God" which came to him by way of his "Great Revelation" that actually does reveal "Christ Within". As if to suggest what you see of Him (Christ) in terms of His behavior towards those HE has been sent and compelled to teach? 

A specific type of spiritual and behavioral change in mindset that will cause the origin of mans overall weakness before "God" to grow pale in comparison to Christ In You! The type of power that ONLY a True King can have and exert over His subjects...

Much like Christ exhibited of Himself in order to reveal his otherwise worldly assumed weakness (Love) so that men would "HOPEFULLY"  receive his likeness unto the Heavenly (Divine) Father). In terms of being absent, we must also remember Christ in his saying "It is better that I should depart so that another should come".

In terms of equality in Gods sight, how is it that Paul or anyone can speak with true "Authority" without it also being Christ who's speaking through a personage?)

We are glad whenever we are weak but you are strong; and our prayer is for your perfection. This is why I write these things when I am absent, that when I come I may not have to be harsh in my use of authority — the authority the Lord gave me for building you up, not for tearing you down.
NIV

In a nutshell, one still has to find Paul or anyone else "Believable" in their own accounting of the "Christ".

 Such a man who gave of the life he (Paul) was also given in order to go on to tell of another man namely Jesus the Christ whom also sacrificed in order that some might come to know their corporate "Father" and creator....all of which helps explain "Why" you were put here in the beginning!

In terms of mankind, a man named Paul or Saul surely some of every generation could try and justify themselves as compared, ye what of the man in whom No sin was found and it was impossible for him to Lie and that in the sight of God?

Is your hope based on the lie God can NOT see or has no ears that always hear? Is your hope based on NOT being found to be the worst of the worst among many who are in your opinion?

Now ask yourself as compared to whom?

To then try to name them and then find the one who will accept that list as if somehow they are less worthy of an accounting that is without they're eternal hope of Christ also being found to be in them on a most certain day soon to come?

Luke 23:34
Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do . And they parted his raiment, and cast lots. KJV

There is a time in the past of many when these words in red might be true, yet there is a time in everyone's future where it can not be True. A time found on the other side of the revelation of a man Named Jesus the Christ.

A time where all have been told yet only some would choose to believe what they've been told of His coming that should not come as a surprise or thief in the Night!

1 Thess 5:4-5
But you, brothers, are not in darkness so that this day should surprise you like a thief. You are all sons of the light and sons of the day.
NIV

A most certain time when every knee will be given to bow before Him that is due to His far exceeding Majesty and Glory. Amen, Lord come quickly!

Facing the facts does not mean abusing the "Right"

There's much that could be said about many things, yet choosing to speak only of meaningful things also suggest the redeemable value and profitability of time that's been given. sw

Why do certain things that are discovered in this world prove to be "Phenomenal"?

Wouldn't the depth of the word "Phenomenal" also need to be qualified by the depth of the observer?

Take for example the small child who for the first time finds an acorn on the forest floor?

It doesn't seem to be that big of a deal right? Especially when the child lifts their eyes and sees there are thousands more acorns just like the one in their hand lying every where!

But if you were to ask that child how many tree's they see in that same forest, what then becomes more obvious to someone else who's already "In the Know"?

Does their perspective allow for them to only take inventory of the tree's that are already vertical OR do they stop and consider the enormous potential that are already within the acorn in hand?

In terms of "Innocence" where does its crest meet with the realm of what anyone is assumed to know? When I ask this I'm suggesting looking into a realm of the "Unknown". A place that's been defended for so long in that there's no way possible for it ever to be discovered what others might be thinking at any given moment?

Is it possible to consider God in this same way? God as if also a realm where no man can ever have any hope that's also real of ever finding himself able to look into this said realm in order to simultaneously know what's in the heart of God at any given moment?

Why would a man ever contemplate looking into such a realm, I mean come on we're talking about God here, right?

The same God who also task everyone who suggest they believe in Him to also Be made "Like Him"? Am I still correct so far?

The same God who also said that in the beginning, He made "Man" (Adam) or "Mankind" in His own image?

The same God who tells this said "Mankind" to call no one on earth their "Father"? Is there any wisdom to be gleaned in such a suggestion?

Not if you don't "KNOW" what it is you're also looking for.....

Now if you can, allow yourself to be introduced to the concept of being in "Possession" of an "Identity"?

Is an "Identity" something to be "Possessed" or should it be thought of as such that somehow "Possesses" You?

In terms of one and the same end that's coming and there being only One creator of ALL, exactly how many True Identities can there Be in His eyes?

Are we only talking about "differences between a Pine, Oak and Fig tree? Or are we trying to narrow down individually exactly what it is that gives EACH of them "Life"?

This thing being called "Life" as we NOW know it that as such we've been trained to accept it to be? (Think back on the child in the forest with the single acorn in hand).

Just think how profound many have thought themselves to be and for how long as they go on to do nothing more than "Repeat" what some other fellow being has introduced them to?

How can there be speech that's also TRUE in terms of a "PERSONAL" relationship with One God? A specific type of "Speech" that will also withstand the numerous series of circumstances ONE and the same God also created and forewarns man about?

We can look at the words such as  "Converse" and suggest we understand its depth yet how easy do we forget the origins of such words?

Words LIKE "Convert, Conversion or Conversation" when we not only tell ourselves but try and convince ourselves and others around us that we have understood this medium (Realm) of "spoken words"?

A realm we've been using for how long, yet understand so "Little about? So Little of this potential, especially when we begin to think of a God whose likeness we've been made in as well told to aspire to be Like Him in as many ways as we find ourselves made able to?

And how can we find ourselves within ANYTHING assume to also "Possess" potential without the interaction and full process of the type of Faith God has been explaining and for how long and in how many ways?

How many TRUE models (representations) of Him (God) are there? And why the importance of there being ONLY One  "First borne" among those who "Will" themselves to follow Him?

 Is it still true today what God spoke to One man many many, many years ago?

Gen 4:6-7
Why is your face downcast? If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must master it ."
NIV

2 Cor 5:21-6:1
God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.
NIV

Rom 4:19-25
Without weakening in his faith, he faced the fact that his body was as good as dead — since he was about a hundred years old — and that Sarah's womb was also dead.

Yet he did not waver through unbelief regarding the promise of God, but was strengthened in his faith and gave glory to God, being fully persuaded that God had power to do what he had promised.

This is why "it was credited to him as righteousness."

The words "it was credited to him" were written not for him alone, but also for us, to whom God will credit righteousness — for us who believe in him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead.

He was delivered over to death for our sins and was raised to life for our justification. 
NIV

Rev 11:15
The seventh angel sounded his trumpet, and there were loud voices in heaven, which said:

"The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ,
and he will reign for ever and ever."
NIV

Grace that is True Grace is the strength provided of God whereas His "Mercy" is the "Why" he gave such to as many who will only believe in Him. sw

Raising a "Disciple" or a "Believer"?

There are many powerful words yet few compare to the essence of that which trails behind the word "Because".sw

 In terms of the spoken word(s), picture the tongue as if a small bulldozer that paves (clears) the way for spiritual activity that does enter this world (realm)? Yet how much of what is said truly has to do with Who it was that said what has been "Said'?

Jesus said make straight (level) the path, yet how many have truthfully examined the condition of the trail they suggest they're blazing? And that same trail in the honest light as to how much of what any person says or does actually ends up supporting what is true verses "Suppressing" what is true nor leads others to Christ?

Why did the physical presence of Christ prove insufficient? That to mean that He remain here in physical form unto this day as the savior of of ALL humanity?

I'll answer that question in this way, why wouldn't it be safe to say, "We ALL know what the bible (Holy Writ of God) has to say about His (Jesus) physical presence leaving this world"?

Why did Christ also state it is better that He (in physical form) should go so that "Another" could come (The Holy Spirit)? One who would prove to be not only all sufficient but even more so that He could prove to be "WITH" all mankind if need be at ANY one given moment of time in His defining and our understanding of His "spiritual" Presence?

Yet in THIS day we're in ask any person who also suggest they are "Alive" what the "Spirited" version of God looks like and in what capacity does that same spirit manifest as if NOT as "Christ In You"?

To then go on and truly suggest you're comforted 24/7/365 in the thought of being "Full" of and/or have been "Filled" with that same "Holy Spirit"?

How is that some could even suggest in the sight of God there are some among us who are trying to "Be" "Too" spiritual? Is this true or simply an observation made that's being accompanied by a limited source of divine wisdom?

How many during the time of Christ physical appearance would have suggested the same about Paul, Timothy, Peter, Mary, Stephen James, John, Mathias or even Judas Iscariot? Namely who and what is it about any of them that would go on to prove their accuser(s) to be right or wrong?

While trying to realize the differences between any two people, one of which is either delighting in being carnally minded (spiritually immature) for their own sake and as if somehow opposed to others who truly are taking delight in their "Approach" to the thoughts of somehow "Being" continuously filled with the Holy Spirit?

Does this filling or indwelling happen all at once or does it's full effect(s) take place gradually over time? That to mean completely full to where nothing more can be added unto this person in question? In question "Maybe" but questioned by "Whom"?

How many today who also suggest the habitation (indwelling) of the Holy Spirit that is from Christ that is also alive and active 24/7/365? Exactly what does the Holy Spirit look and act like within a person during so called "Down" time?

Does this spirit ever sleep? Does it ever rest its mind? Does it always return comment when spoken to? Does it always have something to say? Is it always looking for something to do?

Examine closely every aspect of the divine moment captured in time Paul recorded here in terms of "In Spirit".

A specific type of discernment as if you can't leave out one single aspect of all that He goes on to say in order to define the right moment and under terms of the right thing to do in those type of moment(s). Keep in mind Paul had only heard about this man he'd already passed judgment on.

1 Cor 5:3-5
And I have already passed judgment on the one who did this, just as if I (justified) were present. When you are assembled in the name of our Lord Jesus and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present,
NIV

Holy spirit down time to further mean where and when that Holy Spirit is NOT Prophesying about the coming of Christ, parting seas, healing the sick or at least "Looking for" every God appointed opportunity to displace evil spirits?

To then ask the question that if you're NOT seeing the alive and active spirit of Christ every where you turn, whose spirit is being seen at work within any given being at any moment? And to think some suggest little to zero need for the Mind of Christ and at minimum Only on Sunday or their self appointed Holy day?

What did Christ mean when He said, "Today is the Day of the Lord"? Who is it that also decides when Today ends or begins?

Shouldn't it be, the one "Place" that any one who claims to be in Christ should want to be is together with Christ no matter where He "Christ" is? Yet where do those who suggest they believe every word Christ speaks, as if the place where He is also at any given moment?

Many want to be with Christ when He's on top of the mountain (Zion), yet somehow let Christ be found in prison, found face down in the street or on a cross and see how many also want to be there "With Him"? Christ also promises where two or more are gathered in His name He will be THERE "with" THEM, doesn't He?

He also promises that He will NEVER leave nor forsake those who are found to be in Him....

Does that also feed into when Christ sent some out in and for His names sake "Two by Two"? Why does it appear the Apostle Paul would send for someone whenever his former companion would for whatever reason abandon him (Paul) in a region?

It's one thing for a person to "Try" and frame what they're feeling (emotional state) AFTER the fact yet whose PREPARED themselves to receive the harsh reality that more often shows up during those times only God can define as righteous moments of weakness?

That same place where we find ourselves in agreement with Paul where He (God) goes into great detail in order for us to "Find"  (discover) our otherwise and often harsh reality in those moments of weakness for all they truly are in His eyes?

This world tries to condition Godlike beings to run from others who otherwise find themselves "In Trouble"...This world would have us who suggest we believe God to shun such beings because what they are experiencing might somehow prove to some to be contagious.

If God's "Will" and purpose(s) were being viewed as if those things which can ONLY be found (discovered) within the spiritual "Maturing Process" why do so many run from it? Why doesn't leaning on your own understanding also appear to us as leaning on what we've all chosen to be "True" or false?

Are we only talking about the after affects and net results of "How ever many" years have been spent on the outside of your mothers womb or instead are we TRUTHFULLY trying to discuss your God given (born again) spirit God has since assigned and the affect of having come from the spiritual womb of God (Christ)!

Does power make a difference?

If yes whose power are we truly discussing? Why is it that the sometimes subtle manifestation of Gods power doesn't also prove to be sufficient?

In terms of making do with what you do have and that without asking for more, why do some shy away from the question "Why Not" ask for more of who God is in your own process of being made like Him? Is it because more will be expected of our person were we to actually realize an increase of His likeness here on earth?

Is either one of the passage below any more true than the other? Or are both simply NOT being greeted with the "Yes" and "Amen"?

1 John 4:17-18
7 In this way, love is made complete among us so that we will have confidence on the day of judgment, because in this world we are like him . There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love.
NIV

1 John 3:2-3
But we know that when he appears, we shall be like him , for we shall see him as he is. Everyone who has this hope in him purifies himself, just as he is pure. NIV

If your NOT concerned or confident of who it is that speaking "Through" you at any given moment, truly who have you placed your confidence in?

Power is not always the impact of an immediate difference that's been realized. There are times when True power requires MORE than time to manifest.

Divine opportunity to truly speak or do at the precise moment requires being "Lead By the Spirit of God".

True confidence is when God validates and such even if it takes years for that validation to come. Praise God through His infinite wisdom He's exerted through Our Christ and Lord Jesus.

It is the power of His name being exalted the eternal enemies of God despise.

I'm confident in the assumption the coal miner whose found himself trapped in the collapsed mine where he's for years made his living to date doesn't question the motive or appearance of the lamp of one whose managed to find him where he is.

Isa 11:2-3

The Spirit of the LORD will rest on him — the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding,

the Spirit of counsel and of power, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD and he will delight in the fear of the LORD.

NIV

Prov 20:27
The lamp of the LORD searches the spirit of a man; it searches out his inmost being.
NIV


Judg 14:19
Then the Spirit of the LORD came upon him in power.
NIV

1 Sam 10:6

The Spirit of the LORD will come upon you in power, and you will prophesy with them; and you will be changed into a different person. NIV

Ps 106:32-33

By the waters of Meribah they angered the LORD ,and trouble came to Moses because of them; for they rebelled against the Spirit of God, and rash words came from Moses' lips.   

NIV

2 Sam 23:2

"The Spirit of the LORD spoke through me; his word was on my tongue. NIV

Rev 19:10

For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy." 

NIV

Pinnacle of what can't be seen

Stirring the heart should consist of more than revisiting thoughts which look only to keep you in the past. sw 

Is God only the God of what once was or is He also the God of eternity. sw

When it comes to discovering what is True, is there a real difference between an "Alliance" with God or the "Reliance" upon God. sw

Failing to understand servitude which leads to an alliance with the sinful nature has resulted in the imprisonment of many.

Claiming imperfection as the larger portion of your identity says what not only about being "found" righteous in the sight of God yet even more about your perspective of the One you're claiming has been made Lord over you?

It't one thing to assume you know all there is to know about God, yet do men forget the humility involved in knowing when God knows He has someone's undivided attention. sw

The one thing God did first for Paul was to make Him aware, hence the great "Revelation" Paul speaks of.

Yes, God made Paul aware, but aware of what in terms of what? Exactly how weak he (paul) was? At as such by the things he (Paul) suffered (endured) enroute?

How concise were the methods God used? That is to suggest the exact point and place where Paul knew beyond doubt he in and of himself could "Do" very little that was also meaningful to God and that "Without" God?

How could Paul convey to us today without mentioning the many who opposed Paul? How then could he gauge not only the door he discerned as being opened but also how "Effectual Work" he mentions?

1 Cor 16:8-9
8 But I will stay on at Ephesus until Pentecost, because a great door for effective work has opened to me, and there are many who oppose me. NIV

In terms of a must, it "Must" be decided whether or NOT Christ and His disciples were only addressing those back then within the context they describe OR as if they were alive today with us and vice versa.

It's one thing to suggest we're afraid of nothing due to our own ignorance/unbelief of all that is True, yet is it a different matter when we say we're not afraid of anything because we know beyond doubt God is with us?

In terms of Hope that is also real, how could some know to look for a King (Christ) that would eventually come? Did some undermine the receipt of their own fortune by reading "More" into the circumstances (context) under which that same King would eventfully appear?

And what about us today? And where today are those who suggest they also believe in Him who are also looking for Him (Christ) within specific circumstances (context) that are outside scope of what He promised?

Just because something new has been written does not do away with the origin of righteousness. A certain righteousness that upholds having also been recorded for our good?

When a larger fish swallows a smaller fish does the smaller fish simply cease to exist and/or somehow fail to participate in the growth of the consuming fish? Or is the smaller fish simply "Consumed" who then becomes part of all the larger fish goes on to do?

It's when we find ourselves as said "Believers" within a particular generation, who go on believing that which is NOT True that does concern the Christ that we then find ourselves faced with the opportunity to be lead astray.

The word "Aroused" is a peculiar word of choice, especially in the world in which we now live. A word specifically "Chosen" for a very specific reason in my opinion because of how well it has been clearly understood once a certain age/mindset has been reached.

The command "Taste not touch not" when under the influence of the wrong type of spiritual "Stewardship" (supervision) can and will "Arouse" certain desires according to the words of God.

To the spouse who loves their mate, remaining "Faithful" should be mutual and clear speech, whereas remaining faithful under another definition that's quietly looking to find the blind spots in the faithful "Code" lives more than on the fringe of the "Unfaithful".

It will scramble the mind when some claim having remained faithful simply because they've yet to physically penetrate specific socially protected territories of the human anatomy.

Yet in private moments this same mind will exclude itself form such a code to then further feed "Unlikely" desires with "Ungodly" propaganda that promotes the very thing considered to be sinful.

What many are failing to ask of themselves, is it Gods heart to only raise "Good Actors"? How well does a man go on to perform when his wife begins to believe beyond doubt in her mates unfaithfulness?

Is it truly any REAL wonder why we then go on only to fool ourselves when we try to receive the "Profound Mysteries" of God by way of the comparatives He places before us in human form?

Why is it so hard for so many to fathom the simplicity within the thought "God's desire to have sons"? Within the scope of the unity God conveys, why is it so hard for some to escape the gender or skin color trap?

"Is it only sexual and/or life ending acts as we now know them to be that will lead some to eternal death"?

At what point does any type of sin against someone other than God become a "Deal Breaker"? Are your private thoughts truly only YOUR private thoughts within the realm where its also understood that ALL things that do hold out in the hope of belonging to God truthfully DO "Belong" to Him?

Once again how many faces does "The Suppression of the "Truth" take on in this world? Especially when the Truth has moved ahead in the order for which it was designed to be recognized as a "Person"?

Rom 1:18-20
The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. NIV

Was man NOT part of all that God also made and does man not love as God does in His forewarning of things to come that are also a part of what is True and more real than present circumstances?

Is it safe to continue to assume that all thoughts assumed to be private have failed to affect anyone else in this world? Especially those relationships we trust are going ahead in "Order" to become "Most Meaningful"?

And what is the "Beginning of Wisdom" if as such is NOT also found to abide in "The fear of the Lord"?

How many wives assume that for the sake of God they're also protecting everything God stands for when they know deep in their heart they're married to a closet pervert? Are they truly not protecting their own failings in having chosen poorly for themselves?

Yet we read where some used to sacrifice their children and scoff at their methods of survival....

How far does the arm or wickedness reach when it comes to suppressing what God says is the Truth? Especially when it is known and "Believed" that ALL things will be brought into the light of Truth?

Surely there is a season for everything, yet will everyone survive until such a season comes their way?

And that while showing little regard for the thoughts which God suggest do lead to sinful actions "Taken" once they've been conceived?

If you're going to put something to death, do you put it in a cage and continue to feed it or do you put it in a cage and no longer feed it unto starvation? What about self when you see self and all that self does through the eyes of God?

Why is "Good Counsel" often caged and no longer fed? Why do most spiritual considerations today take on the appearance of a skeletons kept hidden in the closet?

I absolutely loathe when people tell me I think too much. What people fail to WANT to understand is the totality of what their trying to "Frame" and that because of all they've failed to consider. Especially when they fail to consider the content of what "Others" do deeply ponder and try to hold dear in the heart.

That is more dearly than the things this world otherwise tries to promote at every twist and turn in the revealing of itself and the sinful nature it promotes.

Could it all have anything to do with accountability? That place where there's no forethought with regards to how such a supposedly private "Act" (sex) could lead TO such wide spread affects on everyone else around us?

Rom 7:4-6
So, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God.

For when we were controlled by the sinful nature, the sinful passions aroused by the law were at work in our bodies, so that we bore fruit for death. But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.NIV

Isa 51:22-23

This is what your Sovereign LORD says, your God, who defends his people: "See, I have taken out of your hand the cup that made you stagger; from that cup, the goblet of my wrath, you will never drink again. I will put it into the hands of your tormentors, who said to you,'Fall prostrate that we may walk over you.'And you made your back like the ground, like a street to be walked over."
NIV

The dead also have need of being resurrected before the dead can speak. sw

Living in a world where lies suggest "No One gets left behind" is not a reality. sw

What is the difference between "Harsh Reality" and that certain place where only the "Truth can hurt". sw

In terms of being "Reconciled" to another, who gets to decide what the previous conditions dictate. sw

In terms of putting "meat on them bones" and the real reason why skeletons get placed in the proverbial closet, how many are put there for the sake of mutual spiritual maturity. sw

In terms of the "Full" development of a "New Creation", why do some find it more important to investigate the past of another. sw

In terms of making a case study, Satan does his homework not only in the dark, but also the past. sw 

Why is it so important to 'Know" how far back God forgives when you stand in His presence and pray for the sake of your own sins. sw

Who is it that knows more about patterns versus what real change looks like. sw

In terms of persecution, this world is not only filled with jealousy but those who refuse to make room for others in the order that also promotes real change. sw

In terms of the response that's also "Real" there's more to change than certain eye's are willing to meet with. sw